Boss Sued By Thief Employee
Discussion
Mr Trophy said:
While I sympathise with the employers predicament you can't be doing that. It's akin to sticking the man in stocks.Mr Trophy said:
He got off lightly - according to the article he was facing a life sentence!hornetrider said:
Mr Trophy said:
While I sympathise with the employers predicament you can't be doing that. It's akin to sticking the man in stocks.my brother used to live in witham and it was the talk of the town, and most people agreed he deserved it.
as do i, its disgusting he go to sue, and effectively win, perhaps naming and shaming would put an few more light fingered people off.
hornetrider said:
Mr Trophy said:
While I sympathise with the employers predicament you can't be doing that. It's akin to sticking the man in stocks.Can you really be charged with false imprisonment for performing a citizen's arrest?
Don
--
"AN angry boss who frogmarched an employee to a police station..."
No he did not. Yet another example of tabloids using a word to mean anything they want.
Funny, though, the media can virtually accuse someone of being a murderer because they have white hair and look a bit weird, that's OK, but walking someone to the police station with a sign round their neck is a worthy of £thousands in compensation. He shouldn't have done it but he did, so what? What happened to common sense in this country?
No he did not. Yet another example of tabloids using a word to mean anything they want.
Funny, though, the media can virtually accuse someone of being a murderer because they have white hair and look a bit weird, that's OK, but walking someone to the police station with a sign round their neck is a worthy of £thousands in compensation. He shouldn't have done it but he did, so what? What happened to common sense in this country?
Indeed, not a single bit of frog marching involved. It would be impressive to see one person frog marching another.
That aside, while you can sympathise with the boss, we live in a country where you are innocent until proven guilty and guilt is determined by the courts, not joe public.
Sillyness on both sides.
That aside, while you can sympathise with the boss, we live in a country where you are innocent until proven guilty and guilt is determined by the courts, not joe public.
Sillyness on both sides.
Edited by DonkeyApple on Tuesday 15th February 17:49
carmonk said:
Funny, though, the media can virtually accuse someone of being a murderer because they have white hair and look a bit weird, that's OK, but walking someone to the police station with a sign round their neck is a worthy of £thousands in compensation. He shouldn't have done it but he did, so what? What happened to common sense in this country?
FFS CM you are really starting to annoy me now.Please desist from posting such well thought out, measured and sensible points.
I've found myself nodding in agreement with all your stuff lately and even though I've not followed up a single post I'm starting to feel like a bloody sock puppet.
Say something stupid and ill advised would you for christ sake so I can have just one smug moment.
br d said:
carmonk said:
Funny, though, the media can virtually accuse someone of being a murderer because they have white hair and look a bit weird, that's OK, but walking someone to the police station with a sign round their neck is a worthy of £thousands in compensation. He shouldn't have done it but he did, so what? What happened to common sense in this country?
FFS CM you are really starting to annoy me now.Please desist from posting such well thought out, measured and sensible points.
I've found myself nodding in agreement with all your stuff lately and even though I've not followed up a single post I'm starting to feel like a bloody sock puppet.
Say something stupid and ill advised would you for christ sake so I can have just one smug moment.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff