Covered rear wheel openings

Covered rear wheel openings

Author
Discussion

LuS1fer

Original Poster:

42,579 posts

260 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
Having read the XK120 thread, I was wondering why there have been no cars (bar the Honda electric thingy and several Citroens)which have embraced this aerodynamic aid in this era of efficiency.

Is it because

(a) it's actually counter-aerodynamic in reality
(b) it's too much of a fag to remove it to change a wheel
(c) cost of engineering in a removable panel
(d) brake cooling issues
(e) something else.

I think covered rear arches look extremely elegant and might help sex up some thoroughly blocky designs.

I can think of the DS/GS and SM and some 50s and 60s Jags - any others?

HellDiver

5,708 posts

197 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
Renault 6 had them.



Granpa had one identical, only in metallic blue. Piece of junk.

Edited by HellDiver on Thursday 27th January 12:21

The Black Flash

13,735 posts

213 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
Interesting, they always look horrible to me.

marcosgt

11,329 posts

191 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
They can look good on the right car wink



although, I always had a particular liking for this model :



M.

Edited by marcosgt on Thursday 27th January 12:29

ImDesigner

1,961 posts

209 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
Modern cars tend to have a large obvious mass on the side profile. The addition of a rear wheel cover will only enhance this bulk making the car look overly heavy and bloated.

angusc43

12,717 posts

223 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
(a) it's too much of a fag to remove it to change a wheel
(b) brake cooling issues
(c) it looks terrible

shakotan

10,808 posts

211 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
Seeing as rear braking proportion is minimal, I'd discount that from the reasons as they are unlikely to overheat.

stewy68

1,826 posts

258 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
doogz said:
The BX as well, although i think it just had a removal panel, as well as the ability to pump the suspension up? Could be wrong on all accounts there though.

As for why they aren't designed like that any more, dunno, some of them look great.
The BX didn't have a removable panel, but with the suspension, that wasn't a problem.
I personally like cars with covered/faired-in rear wheels although the original design has to lend itself to this or it just looks wrong/bloated, etc.

Edited for diabolical grammar.

Edited by stewy68 on Thursday 27th January 13:35

TommyBuoy

1,273 posts

182 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
Is there not a particular E class AMG that has covered rear wheels?

*goes to find picture*

kambites

69,524 posts

236 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
TommyBuoy said:
Is there not a particular E class AMG that has covered rear wheels?

*goes to find picture*
It's the latest Brabus thing, I think.

plasticpig

12,932 posts

240 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
Tatra





Talbot Lago



Chrysler Airflow



EDLT

15,421 posts

221 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
kambites said:
TommyBuoy said:
Is there not a particular E class AMG that has covered rear wheels?

*goes to find picture*
It's the latest Brabus thing, I think.

Chiswickboy

549 posts

203 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
EDLT said:
kambites said:
TommyBuoy said:
Is there not a particular E class AMG that has covered rear wheels?

*goes to find picture*
It's the latest Brabus thing, I think.
Does that look crap or does that look crap?

IMHO

kambites

69,524 posts

236 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
The E-class looks daft, but only because it's a cover over the wheel of a car which has clearly be styled to have an exposed wheel. I think they can look good (for example the mk1 Honda Insight pulls it off) if the car in question is designed with it in mind.

a11y_m

1,861 posts

237 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
+2, but I know it was done for a purpose and to f**k with aesthetics.

Mrs OwenK

543 posts

176 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
They're massively beneficial to aerodynamics; the wheels on a car are one of, if not the biggest source of drag. This is why F1 recently has been mucking about so much trying to cover them over (and once all the avenues are banned, trying to route air over and away from the wheels as much as possible via scoops and sweeping bodywork).

The problem as I think we can all agree is that it looks naff - also one of the reasons that car aerodynamics haven't improved THAT much; we still want our cars to look like cars, and optimising them aerodynamically would have us all driving odd soap bar looking things!

ETA- OwenK (again!)

Edited by Mrs OwenK on Thursday 27th January 14:31

Dogwatch

6,325 posts

237 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
As far as I remember they used to be called Spats. Pain to remove and replace when changing a wheel, also easy to chip the paint in the process. Plus the lock could rust solid between wheel changes. However if you just gave up refitting them the lines of the car were spoilt.

So, nice on someone else's car. Absolute bugger on your own.

kambites

69,524 posts

236 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
There's no particular reason they should be any worse than opening the bonnet or any other panel which only infrequently gets moved.

Zod

35,295 posts

273 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
Looks like a sunblind for the rear wheel. laugh

al1991

4,552 posts

195 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
+3. Covered wheel openings look rubbish, except maybe on the odd classic.