Can I get an opinion on this lens (and the deal)?
Can I get an opinion on this lens (and the deal)?
Author
Discussion

Chris71

Original Poster:

21,549 posts

271 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
Hi all,

I've been contemplating a zoom lens for my 400D for some time now; what do people think of this as a proposition?

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Canon-55-250mm-Telephoto-S...

I presume any recent Canon-fit lens will be okay on the 400D?

It'll mostly be used for taking panning shots of cars.

Many thanks,

Chris

toasty

8,405 posts

249 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
The price looks very good and the reviews are very promising.

http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/showproduct.php...


daveake

687 posts

255 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
Two weeks ago I bought the same lens from the same place for the same price for the same camera smile

Do it!

Chris71

Original Poster:

21,549 posts

271 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
Very tempted. One person suggested it might be a little slow at 250mm?

I doubt that'd be an issue for me as I'm usually shooting in daylight and I'm usually able to get quite close to the action. I had shots from this year's Le Mans published from my 18-55mm lens, just by frantically panning while practically leaning over the crash barrier. The marshalls weren't amused.

markmullen

15,877 posts

263 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
Its a superb little lens for the money, I would have kept mine were it compatible when I made a move to 1 series bodies.

Check back through the forum though, last time (a couple of weeks ago) when someone asked about this lens they got one for £125 new IIRC.

Chris71

Original Poster:

21,549 posts

271 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
markmullen said:
Its a superb little lens for the money, I would have kept mine were it compatible when I made a move to 1 series bodies.

Check back through the forum though, last time (a couple of weeks ago) when someone asked about this lens they got one for £125 new IIRC.
Even better! Thanks.

90% sure I'm going to go with it. I don't strictly need it I don't think, so I'm just going to do a quick check on the finances, but it sounds good to me.

350Wedge

2,364 posts

302 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
Chris71 said:
markmullen said:
Its a superb little lens for the money, I would have kept mine were it compatible when I made a move to 1 series bodies.

Check back through the forum though, last time (a couple of weeks ago) when someone asked about this lens they got one for £125 new IIRC.
Even better! Thanks.

90% sure I'm going to go with it. I don't strictly need it I don't think, so I'm just going to do a quick check on the finances, but it sounds good to me.
Same situation as Mark, I've just moved back to another 1 series body and sold my 55-250 which I was using on a 450D.

Its a fantastic lens, image stabiliser works very well and its a very very sharp lens!! Canon could almost get away with sticking a red L on it in terms of image quaility. Yes it does have a plastic lens mount and you will need to buy a lens hood (doesnt come with one), but for the money it cant be beaten!!

Had I not gone back to a 1 series I'd have kept it for sure.

daveake

687 posts

255 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
350Wedge said:
you will need to buy a lens hood (doesnt come with one)
Yeah, Canon are a bit tight on that. I surely would cost them very very little to add one.

Anyway, plenty on ebay for about £3 inc postage!

Chris71

Original Poster:

21,549 posts

271 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
Seriously considering it.

I'm conscious 55mm is maximum zoom on my current 'kit' lens; do you reckon it's practical to stick this one on as a fit-and-forget general use lens for mostly outdoor car photography?

I found the other thread, but the £125 deal didn't include delivery, it goes up to almost exactly the same price once it's shipped from Hong Kong or wherever.

Execuse my naivety, but what's the exact function of a lens hood (reducing glare etc, I guess)? Found this one on Amazon: http://www.amazon.co.uk/CANON-2637A001AA-ET-60-Len...

Seight_Returns

1,640 posts

230 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
Don't have this lens but everything I read about it is very positive. +1 to the other "do it"s from me.

f5.6 at the long end is indeed not particularly fast - but I struggle to think of a zoom that's any faster at 250mm for any money.

Primary function of the lens hood is indeed to reduce glare. Also gives some protection against knocks. Makes you look the part too.

Chris71

Original Poster:

21,549 posts

271 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
Seight_Returns said:
Primary function of the lens hood is indeed to reduce glare. Also gives some protection against knocks. Makes you look the part too.
hehe

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
Chris71 said:
Very tempted. One person suggested it might be a little slow at 250mm?
Its a great lens for the price, dosnt have USM and is f5.6 but you have to spend a ton to get something faster than f5.6 at 200mm+!

This is one of the current bargains in the canon lineup.

Diabolik

1,222 posts

190 months

Thursday 27th January 2011
quotequote all
Take a look here for some inspiration...

The lens archives on there really are useful...

Chris71

Original Poster:

21,549 posts

271 months

Tuesday 1st February 2011
quotequote all
Well, I placed an impulse order yesterday, so I'll report back!

markmullen

15,877 posts

263 months

Tuesday 1st February 2011
quotequote all
Good man, you'll not regret it.

I've just advised my brother to get one to accompany his new 500d.

Cuchillo

687 posts

294 months

Monday 14th March 2011
quotequote all
Chris71 said:
Well, I placed an impulse order yesterday, so I'll report back!
Hi Chris

Did the lense arrive? What are your opinions of it?

TIA

Cuch

Original Poster

5,429 posts

205 months

Monday 14th March 2011
quotequote all
I've got one, I don't use it that often as I mainly use a 50mm prime but when I have used it it's always impressed me, 110% worth the money.