Audi S3 .
Author
Discussion

2000 GTV

Original Poster:

68 posts

177 months

Sunday 26th December 2010
quotequote all


I need 4wd and am thinking of a facelift model around 21k.

Any experiences?

Petrol Only

1,607 posts

191 months

Sunday 26th December 2010
quotequote all
The imagine is sublime.

Schermerhorn

4,350 posts

205 months

Sunday 26th December 2010
quotequote all
I prefer the Mk1 model (98-02). In yellow please.

tomsugden

2,368 posts

244 months

Sunday 26th December 2010
quotequote all
I have owned a Mk1, and also driven a Mk2. Although the Mk2 is undoubtedly a better drive and substantially quicker, I prefer the looks of the Mk1. With 225bhp for the later Mk1, it's no slouch. It was very well put together, would do 30mpg quite easily if driven sensibly, and was also seriously competent in snow and ice. I'd have one again in a shot.

CraigyMc

17,862 posts

252 months

Sunday 26th December 2010
quotequote all
Petrol Only said:
The imagine is sublime.
Use the imagine

MondeoMan1981

2,444 posts

199 months

Sunday 26th December 2010
quotequote all
The Mk2 looks like its ate too much over Christmas, the Mk1 has such better proportions.

Fat chicks need loving too though, so go for it OP...

young_bairn

714 posts

192 months

Sunday 26th December 2010
quotequote all
The Mk1 was great. Not driven the mk2 but Im sure it will be great fun and of course you have the imagine.

Edited by young_bairn on Sunday 26th December 09:30

CaptainSlow

13,179 posts

228 months

Sunday 26th December 2010
quotequote all
I'm not sure why people are talking about the Imagine as any Audi geek will know that this is a S Line only feature.

I had a mk2 SB, was a great car with performance and comfort. I would add though that it wasn't great in the snow, but that is likely to have been due to the tyres.

volvoforlife

724 posts

179 months

Sunday 26th December 2010
quotequote all
The S3 is not good in snow. A friend has one and it has been no better than any other car.

s3fella

10,524 posts

203 months

Sunday 26th December 2010
quotequote all
I ahve a mk1 variant with 350hp and it is a quick car no doubt.

However, they are small in the back and boot, so hardly any more practical than a TT.
They are still a pretty heavy car, lots of gizmos, airbags and lardiness, as stock the brakes are pretty woeful, (weird as same size brakes on golf are fine). Its the extra weight.
Also, as stock, the handling is awful.

BUt it is not all bad news. They are well put together, pretty economical, and quite rare too and have the RS style wide arches as stock. Stick some larger brakes on it, R32 or Brembo kit, some bilstein shocks with H and R springs, R32 front roll bar and as large a rear bar as you can find, a nice rempa and suddenly, a car which you'll need to be a decent wheelman to keep up with a clio 182, will be right up there with the quickest hot hatches/ super hatches.

Go for a large turbo kit some decent rods to boot and suddenly you'll be frightening 911's and 360 Fezzas!

As standard, the second generation car is far better, but again suffers from size and weight. You dont really need the new turbo to get good power from them, the K04 will yield 350hp + and it is nice inside, and pretty ok point to point. BUt to really get the best from them, needs some suspension tweaks and a few pennies spending. IN snow they will be great on snow tyres, but on stock summer rubber, whislt traction will be ok, you will not have a hope in hell of stopping!

2000 GTV

Original Poster:

68 posts

177 months

Monday 27th December 2010
quotequote all
Thank you.

Anyone owned one?

Stu R

21,410 posts

231 months

Monday 27th December 2010
quotequote all
2000 GTV said:
Thank you.

Anyone owned one?
Yes, the chap in the post before yours wink

2000 GTV

Original Poster:

68 posts

177 months

Monday 27th December 2010
quotequote all
The latest model..

CaptainSlow

13,179 posts

228 months

Monday 27th December 2010
quotequote all
Yes me.

magnus911

584 posts

205 months

Monday 27th December 2010
quotequote all
Maybe i can help. I leased a new one in 2008 for 2 years, and I have recently replaced it with a Cayenne.

The S3 is a great car. Very capable, quick, reliable, cheap to run and is fun to drive.
I actually have commented elsewhere that I thought i dealt with last year's snow in SE England better than the Cayenne has this year. Neither has been run on winter tyres.

Don't worry too much about paying an extra £1500 quid in used prices to get the RNS-E (nav) as this can be retrofitted via ebay for around £600.

if there's anything specific you want to know please ask. I wouldn't hesitate to own another. The DSG (or S-Tronic now) box is class as well, although I know a few people who didn't get on with it but they couldn't be trusted with a manual either.

magnus911

584 posts

205 months

Monday 27th December 2010
quotequote all
In addition, to answer s3fella's points, I would add that I had mine mapped to 330 HP and it was a very quick car thereafter. i would also average over 35mpg on the motorway and around 20 in town.

The brakes in the current model i believe are the same as the old RS6 and don't require upgrading unless you're running more power than you'll get from the GIAC hammer remap.

RS4 bucket seats are a very desirable option on second handers.

2000 GTV

Original Poster:

68 posts

177 months

Tuesday 28th December 2010
quotequote all
Thanks magnus.