Local Council worshops
Discussion
I've been reading this article and was wondering if anyone has any experiences of using them.
http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/travel/cheap-mot
I like this bit the best 'Local Council worshops come highly recommended, they dont do repairs so they have no interest in trying to generate work for themselves'.
Naturally, anthing that keeps money out of the dealers pocket has got to be a good thing.
http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/travel/cheap-mot
I like this bit the best 'Local Council worshops come highly recommended, they dont do repairs so they have no interest in trying to generate work for themselves'.
Naturally, anthing that keeps money out of the dealers pocket has got to be a good thing.
You may find that they won't do little repairs such as replacing bulbs, wiper blades and adjusting the headlamps, which would mean an outright fail rather than a fail followed by a pass (PRS). The PRS system allows the tester to do minor repairs at the end of the test (within 1 hour), whereby he can print a fail immediately followed by a pass. Not doing these repairs would mean another trip for a retest.
mcford said:
You may find that they won't do little repairs such as replacing bulbs, wiper blades and adjusting the headlamps, which would mean an outright fail.
These are things that we as responsible motorists are checking before every journey though, no.?I would be deeply ashamed of myself if I submitted a car with a blown bulb or worn out wipers etc and would deserve the outright fail.
Have used council stations in the past and would use them again. The local Renault stealer, lets call it Veg Rardy, failed the wifey's Clio a few years ago on 'front brake condition' and would change the discs and pads for the princely sum of £260. I instructed them to leave the car alone and I drove it to the local council testing place who passed it without so much as an advisory. I even asked the tester, specifically, if there was anything wrong with the brakes. There was nothing wrong with them at all. We got another 10k miles from that set of pads and we're still on the original discs now.
redtwin said:
mcford said:
You may find that they won't do little repairs such as replacing bulbs, wiper blades and adjusting the headlamps, which would mean an outright fail.
These are things that we as responsible motorists are checking before every journey though, no.?paulmurr said:
Have used council stations in the past and would use them again. The local Renault stealer, lets call it Veg Rardy, failed the wifey's Clio a few years ago on 'front brake condition' and would change the discs and pads for the princely sum of £260. I instructed them to leave the car alone and I drove it to the local council testing place who passed it without so much as an advisory. I even asked the tester, specifically, if there was anything wrong with the brakes. There was nothing wrong with them at all. We got another 10k miles from that set of pads and we're still on the original discs now.
Somebody should clean up the industry it stinksmcford said:
The PRS system allows the tester to do minor repairs at the end of the test (within 1 hour), whereby he can print a fail immediately followed by a pass. Not doing these repairs would mean another trip for a retest.
That explains how my recent MOT hiccup occurred. It failed due to a sidelight bulb being out (even though it was less than a week old) which I was aware of, but didn't have time to fix that morning. The sidelight bulb was replaced by the garage and the MOT passed, even though they forgot to plug the main headlight back in before I collected it.Gassing Station | General Gassing [Archive] | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff