Oh what a SOTW!
Discussion
ZOLLAR said:
Ad said:
One owner from new until I bought it a couple of weeks ago
Why is he selling it after a few weeks?, what could be wrong with it? 
Edit if there is nothing wrong then

Edited by ZOLLAR on Monday 13th December 14:54
Bayeux said:
Mr Gear said:
ZOLLAR said:
what could be wrong with it? 
It's an ugly, irrelevant and unreliable saloon car?


V6 - check.
Momo leather - check.
Alfa badge - check.
Lovely

Now go and wash your mouth out!

Bayeux said:
It's f
HTH.
Great Pretender said:
Bayeux said:
It's f
HTH.

CampDavid said:
Bayeux said:
Does the 2.5 V6 have a list of known issues?
I think I need this car, can feel my wallet twitching!
A mate of mine had one, other than the engine, gearbox, brakes, suspension, steering and of course the electrics it ran quite reliablyI think I need this car, can feel my wallet twitching!

I have owned an Alfa .....for 4 months

What can I say, it was reliable enough and everything worked ......sometimes

But it was lovely and I was way too fussy and should have kept it.
Still love most Alfas though
Mr Gear said:
ZOLLAR said:
what could be wrong with it? 
It's an ugly, irrelevant and unreliable saloon car?

For 750 quid, it's disposable.
Bayeux said:
Does the 2.5 V6 have a list of known issues?
I think I need this car, can feel my wallet twitching!
Engine is generally ok (it has roots in the 1970's) - mine ate all it's valvetrain but that was due to poor maintenance some 30K before we bought it.I think I need this car, can feel my wallet twitching!
I don't know if the suspension is anything like the 156 -- if it is, it's prone to wearing out.
(Edit to add: Our V6 has 126K on it and seems to still run ok. Poor on fuel though)
Edited by Mr E on Monday 13th December 15:31
Bayeux said:
Does the 2.5 V6 have a list of known issues?
I think I need this car, can feel my wallet twitching!
It's basically the same engine as the 3.0/3.2 and is generally very strong.I think I need this car, can feel my wallet twitching!
Usual cambelt caveats apply.
Bobda on here had a beatiful example that some lowlife decide to steal off him.
If you look at the mileages most 166's have done (most are over 100k and quite a few nearer 200k) they can't be that unreliable....
In truth, they're not a lot worse (and in some ways better) than any aged exec. They have a few set things which always seem to go on them but most of the basics are no worse than anything else.
The 2.5 is not that popular as it drinks as much as the 3.0 but isn't a lot faster than the 2.0.
The suspension does wear out.
In truth, they're not a lot worse (and in some ways better) than any aged exec. They have a few set things which always seem to go on them but most of the basics are no worse than anything else.
The 2.5 is not that popular as it drinks as much as the 3.0 but isn't a lot faster than the 2.0.
The suspension does wear out.
Suspension and mafs are a consummable item, and at 125k its either due or overdue a belt change, new owner has just found out and wants to move it asap without incurring the cost or the engine lunching itself.
I loved mine
and keep looking, but want a facelifted 3.2ti in black with sand leather. Not picky at all me 
I loved mine


Gassing Station | General Gassing [Archive] | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff