Absolute cheapest car to buy and run?
Absolute cheapest car to buy and run?
Author
Discussion

twazzock

Original Poster:

1,930 posts

185 months

Tuesday 23rd November 2010
quotequote all
Hi all, I'm looking to buy my first car (the Fiesta doesn't count) and have decided to go for the cheap shed route, build up some NCB, save the money for booze and birds etc. etc.

So I need some recommendations for something that will cost next to nothing to run, be cheap to buy (£400, tops), never break, and maybe, just maybe, be OK to drive?

I've researched a lot of cars, but the Peugeot 106 1.5D seems to be coming out on top so far. Get one for a few hundred quid, 60+mpg, reasonable to insure (more than the 1.1 petrol but the fuel savings should balance it out), reliable. As far as I've seen, nothing can really match it in terms of pure cheapness. Any other ideas?

It needs to be able to do about 400 miles a week. Ideally in some comfort and quiet but what with me being 18, the insurance companies don't much like the idea of me driving anything bigger or sturdier than a biscuit tin (yes, I've done many a quote). I'll just get some earplugs instead...


Anyway... over to you smile


P.S. I realise it's late; I'll bump this tomorrow. TIA

Edited by twazzock on Tuesday 23 November 02:12

SlowStig

894 posts

187 months

Tuesday 23rd November 2010
quotequote all
Metro!

Either a 1.1 or the 1.5 derv (same engine as the pug 1.5 derv) and can be made to handle very well for not much outlay. Otherwise you are prob best looking for something jap like a micra. Micra's are like roaches, even after a nuclear war they will STILL be going

chard

28,104 posts

199 months

Tuesday 23rd November 2010
quotequote all
SlowStig said:
Metro!
you are prob best looking for something jap like a micra. Micra's are like roaches, even after a nuclear war they will STILL be going
You could try arm wresting your local Pizza delivery percon for one.

varsas

4,070 posts

218 months

Tuesday 23rd November 2010
quotequote all
I wouldn't be looking at a specific model. I'd probably search autotrader for all cars with under 60,000 miles and have a look. Doing that today you end up with this..

http://www.autotrader.co.uk/classified/advert/2010...

Which seems to tick all your boxes, should even be a bit of a laugh to drive. No mention of MOT though.

BoRED S2upid

20,756 posts

256 months

Tuesday 23rd November 2010
quotequote all
Pug 106 or Saxo 1.1 are as cheap as each other, parts are cheap, scrap yards are full of them get the least mileage example you can there wouldn't be much difference in a petrol 1.1 that had done 50k to a 1.5D that had done twice that. Id probably opt for the petrol the engines can take some abuse believe me a mate had a 1.1 106 for years 4 up thrashing it to death to try and maintain 70mph on a motorway.

Twincam16

27,647 posts

274 months

Tuesday 23rd November 2010
quotequote all
Fiat Cinquecento or Seicento.

So long as it's maintained, it'll soldier on forever, simply because they come from a time when Fiat overcompensated for their previous rust worries by galvanising everything to within an inch of its life, and they're so simple there is literally nothing on them to break anyway. They're pre-2001 and under 1565cc, so attract the lowest tax bracket you're going to find on a properly cheap car, the smaller-engined versions are in insurance group 1, and in the right places you might even get classic insurance on the Cinquecento.

Also, if you get a yellow Cinquecento and fancy making a bit of money back on resale, replace the passenger door with a red one and sell it as an Inbetweeners replica. Some wag will buy it in the same way they buy 'Del Boy' Reliant Regals.

davepoth

29,395 posts

215 months

Tuesday 23rd November 2010
quotequote all
Peugeot 106 diesel is a great call. Slower than pretty much anything though, and I recall that driving down the road to work in one, all of the cows in the next field came to the fence because it sounded just like the farmer's tractor. biggrin

Dog Star

17,017 posts

184 months

Tuesday 23rd November 2010
quotequote all
Got to be a Citroen AX 1.4 diseasel. Surely they must be group 0.5 insurance, run on thin air and have parts so cheap as to be almost free?

POORCARDEALER

8,603 posts

257 months

Tuesday 23rd November 2010
quotequote all

106, AX, Metro, old polo.

I think at 400 quid you might struggle for a decent bubble micra

RizzoTheRat

27,007 posts

208 months

Tuesday 23rd November 2010
quotequote all
Bear in mind that while diesels generally do more MPG, diesel is more expensive, and they usually have shorter service intervals, so its not always the most economical car that wins. That said my old Citroen ZX TD made me about 10p/mile profit on 100,000 miles worth of mileage claims duo to averaging 50mpg, being very reliable (power steering pump and heater matrix were the only non consumable failures before the radius arm bearings went at 196000 miles), and being worth bugger all when I started so not depreciating.

300bhp/ton

41,030 posts

206 months

Tuesday 23rd November 2010
quotequote all
twazzock said:
Hi all, I'm looking to buy my first car (the Fiesta doesn't count) and have decided to go for the cheap shed route, build up some NCB, save the money for booze and birds etc. etc.

So I need some recommendations for something that will cost next to nothing to run, be cheap to buy (£400, tops), never break, and maybe, just maybe, be OK to drive?
And for my next trick I'm going to invent a perpetual motion machine!!!! ta-da! biggrin

twazzock said:
I've researched a lot of cars, but the Peugeot 106 1.5D seems to be coming out on top so far. Get one for a few hundred quid, 60+mpg, reasonable to insure (more than the 1.1 petrol but the fuel savings should balance it out), reliable. As far as I've seen, nothing can really match it in terms of pure cheapness. Any other ideas?

It needs to be able to do about 400 miles a week. Ideally in some comfort and quiet but what with me being 18, the insurance companies don't much like the idea of me driving anything bigger or sturdier than a biscuit tin (yes, I've done many a quote). I'll just get some earplugs instead...


Anyway... over to you smile


P.S. I realise it's late; I'll bump this tomorrow. TIA

Edited by twazzock on Tuesday 23 November 02:12
Comfort and quiet in a Pug 106 diesel biglaugh

GravelBen

16,144 posts

246 months

Tuesday 23rd November 2010
quotequote all
Toyota Corollas are very, very hard to kill. And the older ones are actually not a bad drive either.

DudeJude

1 posts

178 months

Tuesday 23rd November 2010
quotequote all
If it's of any interest I compiled a list of cheap to run yet reliable cars in this blog: http://www.osv.ltd.uk/latestnews/main-osv-news/wha...

Roman

2,032 posts

235 months

Tuesday 23rd November 2010
quotequote all
SlowStig said:
Otherwise you are prob best looking for something jap like a micra. Micra's are like roaches, even after a nuclear war they will STILL be going
yes

My girlfriends old Micra has been driven flat out everywhere for seven years - She's always said it'll be replaced with a Cooper as soon as anything goes wrong but the damned thing just keeps on running faultlessly no matter how hard it's driven, year after year. It's as tough as a bloody Gurkha!

All the manual petrols return around 45mpg, low weight & small size make the 1.0 quick off the mark in traffic and manoeuvrable around town & it loves revs but you may get a 1.3 or 1.4 for your budget which are faster.

Daston

6,115 posts

219 months

Tuesday 23rd November 2010
quotequote all
I found the ZX handled like a boat when I have driven them and the brakes seem to either be fully on or not on at all.

And sorry did I just read that a 1.0 micra is quick off the mark??? When I had one (just as a run around) I could grow a beard in the time it takes to get to 60! Damn thing refused to die though and it got a lot of abuse.

EDLT

15,421 posts

222 months

Tuesday 23rd November 2010
quotequote all
The Suzuki Swift was also quite good, this one is cheapish:
http://www.pistonheads.com/sales/2231685.htm

My dad bought one with lower miles and air-con for the same price though, I think he did 60,000 miles in it and the only times it went wrong was when he overloaded it and buggered the rear shocks + bearings. It went on to become my first car, where it was never serviced for two years, thrashed everywhere and never cost me a penny!

blugnu

1,523 posts

257 months

Tuesday 23rd November 2010
quotequote all
My mum had a 1988 Peugeot 205 'Style'. It was a 4 speed, 1.1 as I recall. She bought it with 30k on it and sold it 12 years later with 130k on it. In that time I drove it like a 17 year old lad, as I was a 17 year old lad (bottomed it out crossing a dual carriageway from a side road with 4 of us in it and wore through the handbrake cable which baffled my dad). It also took me to and from University on it's suspension bump stops every term and was used to do short shopping trips and long drives to pretty much everywhere in the country. Largely flat out.

When it went there was no a spot of rust on it, and it started first time every time and ran like a sewing machine.

You cannot break them - highly recommended.

cheadle hulme

2,496 posts

198 months

Tuesday 23rd November 2010
quotequote all
Skoda Felicia from eBay.

VW Polo underneath, 40mpg, parts are cheap as chips.

£400 seems to be the minimum for something with tax and a reasonable MOT.

W00DY

16,143 posts

242 months

Tuesday 23rd November 2010
quotequote all
http://pistonheads.com/sales/2279686.htm

More than your budget, but got to be epically cheap to run.

thinfourth2

32,414 posts

220 months

Tuesday 23rd November 2010
quotequote all
The Crack Fox said:
"Absolute cheapest car to buy and run?"

Who cares ? For 5% more than your budget you can probably find something that won't make you self-harm each time you look at it...
Yeah i agree completely

A £400 car would drive me to the edge of sucide where as a £420 car would pull birds like you wouldn't belive