Mohammed is now the most popular boys' name...
Mohammed is now the most popular boys' name...
Author
Discussion

deeps

Original Poster:

5,432 posts

271 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
...according to AOL news, sorry if it's a repost...

Article said:
Mohammed is now the most popular name for newborn boys in Britain.

The name was in third place but last year shot up to first place, overtaking Jack, which had topped the list for the past 14 years, and now comes third behind Oliver.

A total of 7,549 newborns were given 12 variations of the Islamic prophet Mohammed's name last year, such as Muhammad and Mohammad.

The second most popular boy's name, Oliver, was given to 7,364 babies. Harry and Alfie came in fourth and fifth place.

The official list, which covers all births in 2009 in England and Wales, has ­Mohammed at number 16 but this does not include the many different spellings, which are all ranked separately.

When they are added in, Mohammed zooms all the way up to top spot for the first time [snip]
http://www.parentdish.co.uk/2010/10/28/mohammed-is-now-the-most-popular-boys-name/?icid=main

deeps

Original Poster:

5,432 posts

271 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
Sorry, I can't get that link to work for love nor money.

spud989

3,002 posts

210 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
Remember reading something on the BBC earlier.

IIRC it was 16th overall and #1 in the West Midlands?

[edit] missed the line dealing with that on first reading. Don't think the Beeb addressed spelling variation.

Edited by spud989 on Friday 29th October 01:12

Colin 1985

1,936 posts

200 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
Why do Christians never name their kids Jesus? scratchchin

XJSJohn

16,152 posts

249 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
Colin 1985 said:
Why do Christians never name their kids Jesus? scratchchin
they do in latin america

Pothole

34,367 posts

312 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
interesting editing of the article:

"There were 706,248 children born in England and Wales last year."

so less than 0.15%? (maths not my strong point) what exactly is your point OP, if you have one and are not just trolling?

Pothole

34,367 posts

312 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
Telegraph said:
According to the official version, Oliver is recognised today as the most common name for baby boys. But the official version is disguising the truth....in fact, in all its various spellings, Mohammed is now the favourite name for newborn boys in England and Wales.


Although Oliver has overtaken Jack after 14 years, when variations of the Islamic Prophet's name were included it came top for the first time, given to 7,515 boys, compared with 7,364 Olivers.
Even without variant spellings, Mohammed was the most common boy's name in the West Midlands and the fourth most popular in London. In the South West, however, it ranked 145th. It was 16th overall.
Its popularity was "symbolic of Britain's diversity", said Dr Justin Gest, an academic at Harvard and the London School of Economics, and author of Apart: Alienated and Engaged Muslims in the West.
"Where we had many Johns and Jacks we also have plenty of Mohammeds now."
The figures, from the Office for National Statistics, showed that there were 3,300 boys named Mohammed, 2,162 called Muhammad, 1,073 Mohammads and 980 called either Muhammed, Mohamed, Mohamad, Muhamed or Mohammod.
Experts said the development reflected the name's overwhelming popularity among British Muslims rather than any "explosion" in the British Muslim population.
The figures, for 2009, showed the name had grown substantially in popularity in recent years, coming second the previous year once variants were included.
Muslims see Mohammed as "a paragon of excellence" and seek to emulate his life and follow his guidance, making the name an obvious choice for parents, Dr Gest said.
The figures also heralded the dawn of the age of Olives.
Olivia remained in first place for baby girls, chosen for 5,201, while Oliver was first for boys under the ONS rules, which count spelling variations as separate names.

deeps

Original Poster:

5,432 posts

271 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
Pothole said:
interesting editing of the article:

"There were 706,248 children born in England and Wales last year."

so less than 0.15%? (maths not my strong point) what exactly is your point OP, if you have one and are not just trolling?
Why is the editing of the article intersting, I merely snipped it rather than copy the whole thing, which I always do. What are you implying?

What relevance has 0.15%?? It's either at the top of the heap ot it isn't.

I would have thought my point was obvious, so much so that you acuse me of trolling.

Blue Meanie

73,668 posts

285 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
Pothole said:
interesting editing of the article:

"There were 706,248 children born in England and Wales last year."

so less than 0.15%? (maths not my strong point) what exactly is your point OP, if you have one and are not just trolling?
Oh noes, we're being invaded.

I might post my "Oh noes, the islamicals are taking over" graph.


Shay HTFC

3,588 posts

219 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
Its most popular because pretty much EVERY muslim boy gets given that name.

My mate is called Mohammed out of necessity almost, but he goes by a different name in day to day life. That's pretty common.
So with 0.15% of the total being Mohammed, its hardly anything amazing.

Imagine every boy born in Liverpool was called Craig and then Craig got to the top of the list. It wouldn't mean Liverpudlians were taking over the UK.

Pints

18,451 posts

224 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
So does this make us officially a Muslim country then? scratchchin
When can we expect to be invaded by the US of A?

everGreddy

195 posts

232 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
Shay HTFC said:
Its most popular because pretty much EVERY muslim boy gets given that name.

My mate is called Mohammed out of necessity almost, but he goes by a different name in day to day life. That's pretty common.
So with 0.15% of the total being Mohammed, its hardly anything amazing.

Imagine every boy born in Liverpool was called Craig and then Craig got to the top of the list. It wouldn't mean Liverpudlians were taking over the UK.
Yeap; if there were lots of frenchies living here we'd be seeing 'Jean Pauls' at the top, its a traditional name which is often not actually used. They're too proud/lazy to leave france to travel to britain though biggrin

Oh, and I know of very few children called Jack or Oliver. Why would I be worried about a marginally larger number of Mohammeds?

Blue Meanie

73,668 posts

285 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
everGreddy said:
Why would I be worried about a marginally larger number of Mohammeds?
Because it makes a very nice "OMG, WTF" headline.

everGreddy

195 posts

232 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
Blue Meanie said:
everGreddy said:
Why would I be worried about a marginally larger number of Mohammeds?
Because it makes a very nice "OMG, WTF" headline.
OMG, WTFyikes



It worked biggrin

Pothole

34,367 posts

312 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
deeps said:
Pothole said:
interesting editing of the article:

"There were 706,248 children born in England and Wales last year."

so less than 0.15%? (maths not my strong point) what exactly is your point OP, if you have one and are not just trolling?
Why is the editing of the article intersting, I merely snipped it rather than copy the whole thing, which I always do. What are you implying?

What relevance has 0.15%?? It's either at the top of the heap ot it isn't.

I would have thought my point was obvious, so much so that you acuse me of trolling.
Not obvious which is why I asked for clarification. Put a thicky out of his misery?

Tiggsy

10,261 posts

282 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
In other non news, Brown is apparently the most popular coulour for babies born to brown parents.

BeeRoad

684 posts

192 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
Pothole said:
deeps said:
Pothole said:
interesting editing of the article:

"There were 706,248 children born in England and Wales last year."

so less than 0.15%? (maths not my strong point) what exactly is your point OP, if you have one and are not just trolling?
Why is the editing of the article intersting, I merely snipped it rather than copy the whole thing, which I always do. What are you implying?

What relevance has 0.15%?? It's either at the top of the heap ot it isn't.

I would have thought my point was obvious, so much so that you acuse me of trolling.
Not obvious which is why I asked for clarification. Put a thicky out of his misery?
His point is that if you say 2.6% of the UK population is muslim, it doesn't sound very scary, but if you say mohammed is the most popular boys name and omit to mention that virtually all muslim boys are called mohammed, it makes it sound like there are millions of 'them' everywhere and that we need to start buying shotguns and canned food and that next tuesday sharia law will be introduced and women banned from driving. So, not all bad then. wink

fatboy b

9,665 posts

246 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
guess it depends what site you believe:

http://www.seraphine.com/maternity-wear-fashion-ne...

12gauge

1,274 posts

204 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all


Mark, Paul, Peter, all religious names.

Obviously, lots of mohammeds scares me that we're sleepwalking into a theocracy, but, then theres lots of people with christian names who are anything but christian.

ShadownINja

80,108 posts

312 months

Friday 29th October 2010
quotequote all
Tiggsy said:
In other non news, Brown is apparently the most popular colour for babies born to brown parents.
For a moment, I thought you meant parents were naming their kids after an ex-Prime Minister. biggrin