3000GT/GTO
Author
Discussion

Comfortably Dumb

Original Poster:

1,237 posts

201 months

Wednesday 13th October 2010
quotequote all
£5k, Twin-turbo, v6, 4wd, 4ws, active suspension, active aero, 155mph, 0-60 sub 6.0...


massive bargain, or massively expensive mistake?

davepoth

29,395 posts

215 months

Wednesday 13th October 2010
quotequote all
Early ones had a frankly ridiculous level of toys (active aero as an example) but I can imagine they will be getting a bit tired by now.

inman999

32,183 posts

189 months

Wednesday 13th October 2010
quotequote all
There's a PH Zeros feature on them somewhere

The people in the know seem to like them.

More of a GT car than a sports car or so I've heard.

F1GTRUeno

6,512 posts

234 months

Wednesday 13th October 2010
quotequote all
Maintenance and problems are supposed to be expensive and numerous.

Always wanted one though, part of the Gran Turismo generation of stupidly quick and complicated Japanese cars.

Comfortably Dumb

Original Poster:

1,237 posts

201 months

Wednesday 13th October 2010
quotequote all
inman999 said:
There's a PH Zeros feature on them somewhere
Cheers, will have a read. smile

Jasandjules

71,119 posts

245 months

Wednesday 13th October 2010
quotequote all
When I was a lot longer I really wanted one but couldn't get insured on them, these days when I see them they look rather dated...

But for a second car toy, if you can find one in good nick, then why not, you only live once.

Comfortably Dumb

Original Poster:

1,237 posts

201 months

Wednesday 13th October 2010
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
When I was a lot longer I really wanted one but couldn't get insured on them, these days when I see them they look rather dated...

But for a second car toy, if you can find one in good nick, then why not, you only live once.
I currently drive an 80's mr2, these look positively futuristic in comparison. hehe

gr88

150 posts

178 months

Wednesday 13th October 2010
quotequote all

i bought a TT from a dealer on Autotrader. (under warrenty(

the Headgasket blew 4 times in 600 miles

if you get a good one its ok

get a stter and all you get is bills - and greif

every job on the twin turbo is an engine out job - even for the thermostats !

when they fixed it - the mechanics would take it for a thrash

blowing it up again..............got my money back in the end through the courts........

a crap car - doesnt even handle well - no feedback or confidece in corners and slow because of the 'computer ' overiding the driver.............

heavey ste jap crap

LuS1fer

42,624 posts

261 months

Wednesday 13th October 2010
quotequote all
For an alternative, look at a 1998-on LS1-engined Camaro Z28/SS. 1580kg, 305hp, 160mph and 0-60 in 5.5 or less.

CrammyJay

163 posts

187 months

Wednesday 13th October 2010
quotequote all
sounds like you had a stinker there,

the one i had was fantastic, and it handled really well

Marf

22,907 posts

257 months

Wednesday 13th October 2010
quotequote all
You want jap for £5k get an STi or EVO.

Comfortably Dumb

Original Poster:

1,237 posts

201 months

Wednesday 13th October 2010
quotequote all
LuS1fer said:
For an alternative, look at a 1998-on LS1-engined Camaro Z28/SS. 1580kg, 305hp, 160mph and 0-60 in 5.5 or less.
The only generation of Camero I don't like the styling of...I'll have a gen5 one day though. yes

Jasandjules

71,119 posts

245 months

Wednesday 13th October 2010
quotequote all
Comfortably Dumb said:
I currently drive an 80's mr2, these look positively futuristic in comparison. hehe
Nothing wrong with an MR2.......

I guess you like to stick with Japanese cars with shedloads of toys.....

Comfortably Dumb

Original Poster:

1,237 posts

201 months

Wednesday 13th October 2010
quotequote all
Jasandjules said:
Nothing wrong with an MR2.......
I wouldn't of had it for 4 years if I thought there was! Time for a change now though and the only criteria I've set at the moment is is the car should be turbo'd, 4wd and able to carry my archery equipment, including longbows. (believe it or not I've had 1 in the '2)

Jasandjules said:
I guess you like to stick with Japanese cars with shedloads of toys.....
Nope, ideally I'd be getting a Caterham but they're just too expensive and compromised.

randomwalk

534 posts

180 months

Wednesday 13th October 2010
quotequote all
they can be as reliable as any other car, I have 2 of them. My Australian one was my daily driver for 10yrs, nothing major ever went wrong, it has 130,000 miles on it now. I have a UK car too which has only 35,000 miles on it and all good. There is alot to go wrong but if kept std these cars are reliable, hard now to find examples that have not been modded or fiddled with.

beebs90

169 posts

199 months

Wednesday 13th October 2010
quotequote all
id love to own one but cant insure them yet seem like bargains to me.

Daston

6,115 posts

219 months

Thursday 14th October 2010
quotequote all
For 5k you could get an R33 GTST or SZ Supra.

Personally I would go for a Mk2 MR2 Turbo but then that is pointless if you need back seats

Comfortably Dumb

Original Poster:

1,237 posts

201 months

Thursday 14th October 2010
quotequote all
Datson, I'd happily have any of them if it wasn't for my desire for something 4wd.

eztiger

836 posts

196 months

Thursday 14th October 2010
quotequote all
Get a good one and you'll have no problems.

Get a chavved up one covered in boost controllers and poorly bolted on upgrades and you'll ask for trouble. Their price point is such that alot of them have been bought, ragged with no thought to maintenance and then moved on before exploding.

Nip over to the uk owners club and the for sale section there...

The people who say they're rubbish cars tend to be people who have never owned one.

They are 20 years old (for mk1's anyway) so they're never going to handle like a 5 year old M3 / elise but they are insanely quick until the top of 3rd (5 speed mk1 box anyway - which is well, well into license losing territory) handle 'well enough' especially with suspension tweaks and at the price point you won't do much better.

I miss mine. I drive a Monaro now and it ticks the boxes my GTO didn't but it's not any quicker at license friendly speeds as it just can't put the power down.

All the issues I had with mine were consumables or age related - mostly pipes rusting. Not much you can do about that. In the 4 years I owned it it was off the road less then my monaro has been in the <1 year I've owned it.

Last winter, having sat outside for 2 weeks without moving...being completely covered in many inches of snow but still turning over at first request with no troubles and then having no fuss traversing the snowy roads was a particularly proud moment given the cars vintage. But then I would have expected no less.

pits

6,605 posts

206 months

Thursday 14th October 2010
quotequote all
eztiger said:
The people who say they're rubbish cars tend to be people who have never owned one.
Had one, it was rubbish, cost a fortune to fix, fuel pump relay blew up taking PTU, taking ECU out as well, not bad considering we were only having a look at the exhaust on the ramps, worked before going on the ramps, broke on the ramps for no reason.

Money pits, buy a Skyline instead.