Flying with a camera?
Author
Discussion

Conor D

Original Poster:

2,124 posts

205 months

Monday 2nd August 2010
quotequote all
Whats the best way to go about this, can you take it as hand luggage? I'm flying to London in the morning, and I want to take my DSLR.

I don't have a camera bag, only a Padded Laptop Jansport Bag.

Flippin' Kipper

638 posts

209 months

Monday 2nd August 2010
quotequote all
Yes take it as hand luggage, you defiantly don't want it in the hold.

mrmr96

13,736 posts

234 months

Monday 2nd August 2010
quotequote all
In hand luggage is fine. But don't use it when you're not supposed to.

Conor D

Original Poster:

2,124 posts

205 months

Monday 2nd August 2010
quotequote all
Will it have any bother going through any of the x-ray machines?

Simpo Two

92,789 posts

295 months

Monday 2nd August 2010
quotequote all
I took my entire camera bag as hand luggage and was very glad I did, taking a nice photo of the Pacific Ocean from 37,000 feet on Christmas morning. A camera you can't reach is not a camera.

Damn that's profound.

Edited by Simpo Two on Monday 2nd August 23:26

Super Slo Mo

5,374 posts

228 months

Monday 2nd August 2010
quotequote all
Conor D said:
Will it have any bother going through any of the x-ray machines?
Not in the slightest.

Conor D

Original Poster:

2,124 posts

205 months

Monday 2nd August 2010
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
I took my entire camera bag as hand luggage and was very glad I did, taking a nice photo of the Pacific Ocean from 37,000 feet on Christmas morning. A camera you can't reach is not a camera.

Damn that's profound.

Edited by Simpo Two on Monday 2nd August 23:26
Are you allowed to use them at all on airplanes?

Simpo Two

92,789 posts

295 months

Monday 2nd August 2010
quotequote all
Conor D said:
Are you allowed to use them at all on airplanes?
You must be thinking of mobile phones. I don't think that light being recorded on a sensor is going to down a 747. Well anyway, I prowled the slumbering corridors of a 747 at stupid-o'clock taking photos and it didn't crash smile

mrmr96

13,736 posts

234 months

Monday 2nd August 2010
quotequote all
Conor D said:
Simpo Two said:
I took my entire camera bag as hand luggage and was very glad I did, taking a nice photo of the Pacific Ocean from 37,000 feet on Christmas morning. A camera you can't reach is not a camera.

Damn that's profound.

Edited by Simpo Two on Monday 2nd August 23:26
Are you allowed to use them at all on airplanes?
Yeah, but they normally ask you to turn off 'all electonic devices' (includes mp3 players, games consoles and cameras) during takeoff and landing... which is a bugger because they are the best bits for taking snaps out the window. I guess you could take a film camera to shoot through the window during take off and landing, so long as it was fully mechanical.

14-7

6,233 posts

221 months

Tuesday 3rd August 2010
quotequote all
Took all my camera kit through as handluggage last time I flew. All 9.1lbs of it. Even had it weighed to be sure I could get it as handluggage as I didn't fancy it going in with normal luggage and being subject to low temperatures and being thrown about.

The only problems were passing through security where both ends I watched my bag go in to the scanner, pass out the other end, the belt stop, my bag go back in, forwards, backwards, watch a few people point at the screen whilst flicking a few buttons, looking at me, looking back at the screen, the bag coming out, being asked to open the bag, what's in that compartment, what's that, showing them it's a camera with a few lenses, flash and so on, does it work, can you prove it, is it all yours, how much does it cost, then being sent on my way.

All very amicable in the end but there were a few worried faces either side in the queue when I was asked, "is this your bag sir, can you open it slowly please?". smile

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

284 months

Tuesday 3rd August 2010
quotequote all
I've flown with my camera + lenses in backpacks, aly cases etc prolyl coming tot he Uk in September with all my gear in my lowepro 400AW, must weigh 10kgs... biggrin

Simpo Two

92,789 posts

295 months

Tuesday 3rd August 2010
quotequote all
If a Boeing 747 can be felled by somebody operating a £99 compact camera, then they need to do some serious thinking. 'JFDI' as they say, albeit discretely.

Nobody had a problem with me wandering about with a DSLR round my neck - mind you that wasn't during take-off or landing, when they are probably more concerned with what a DSLR impressed into your face in the event of crash would do, rather than the DSLR causing the crash. To affect avionics the device has to be radiating something. As far as I know a camera doesn't radiate anything. File under 'OMG we're all going to die' and move on.

horacethefrog

410 posts

243 months

Tuesday 3rd August 2010
quotequote all
confused What kind of weirdness is this thread? Can you take a camera with you on a plane? We have photos on here posted from all over the world, I guess people must be just leaving their gear at home and buying some more when they get there. And scanner staff closely examining camera bags? I guess they don't see many nuts Come on guys, get real.

baz7175

3,551 posts

241 months

Tuesday 3rd August 2010
quotequote all
As Simpo says JFDI....if it wasn't allowed then my many many flights with work would be extremely boring and my flickr set "From An Aeroplane Window" wouldn't exist...




RobDickinson

31,343 posts

284 months

Tuesday 3rd August 2010
quotequote all
OOh time for me to add some from the seat pics...





Missed a superb one over asia once (Singapore) perfect soft light across 100's of ships around the harbour was a stunning view.

Simpo Two

92,789 posts

295 months

Tuesday 3rd August 2010
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
Missed a superb one over asia once (Singapore) perfect soft light across 100's of ships around the harbour was a stunning view.
One of my 'life memories' was taking off from Singapore afer dark and climbing/cirlcling over the harbour whilst sipping a glass of champagne and seeing all the lights twinkling on the boats. However a black print with tiny sqiggly points of light on it didn't really capture the atmosprer!

gary71

2,037 posts

209 months

Tuesday 3rd August 2010
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
OOh time for me to add some from the seat pics...



Missed a superb one over asia once (Singapore) perfect soft light across 100's of ships around the harbour was a stunning view.
The aeroplanes I fly on never have windows that clean! smile

siscar

6,887 posts

247 months

Tuesday 3rd August 2010
quotequote all
14-7 said:
Took all my camera kit through as handluggage last time I flew. All 9.1lbs of it. Even had it weighed to be sure I could get it as handluggage as I didn't fancy it going in with normal luggage and being subject to low temperatures and being thrown about.

The only problems were passing through security where both ends I watched my bag go in to the scanner, pass out the other end, the belt stop, my bag go back in, forwards, backwards, watch a few people point at the screen whilst flicking a few buttons, looking at me, looking back at the screen, the bag coming out, being asked to open the bag, what's in that compartment, what's that, showing them it's a camera with a few lenses, flash and so on, does it work, can you prove it, is it all yours, how much does it cost, then being sent on my way.

All very amicable in the end but there were a few worried faces either side in the queue when I was asked, "is this your bag sir, can you open it slowly please?". smile
It worries me if they don't ask me to open it up, I normally carry two dslr bodies, several lenses, flash etc as well as computer equipment.

I put the really boring stuff in the hold, stuff like battery chargers, but anything of value comes with me. Recently it's easier because airlines have got less stressed about the weight of hand luggage. Once I got my hand luggage weighed at 15kg when the limit was 5kg. Fortunately I had a barbour jacket with me and could go away and come back with a light bag and a very heavy coat!

mrmr96

13,736 posts

234 months

Tuesday 3rd August 2010
quotequote all
Simpo Two said:
If a Boeing 747 can be felled by somebody operating a £99 compact camera, then they need to do some serious thinking. 'JFDI' as they say, albeit discretely.

Nobody had a problem with me wandering about with a DSLR round my neck - mind you that wasn't during take-off or landing, when they are probably more concerned with what a DSLR impressed into your face in the event of crash would do, rather than the DSLR causing the crash. To affect avionics the device has to be radiating something. As far as I know a camera doesn't radiate anything. File under 'OMG we're all going to die' and move on.
We all know that a camera won't crash the plane. But I was just advising the OP of the rules they operate, however pointless.

(Note - the point of the 'no electronics' rule is so that there are NO exceptions. This means that cabin crew don't need to understand what devices are potentially dangerous, and which are not. It's just a blanket 'no' to make enforcing the rule easier.)

Simpo Two

92,789 posts

295 months

Tuesday 3rd August 2010
quotequote all
mrmr96 said:
(Note - the point of the 'no electronics' rule is so that there are NO exceptions
That's every digital watch out then...