Ok now own up ... who was it !!!
Discussion
recalluk said:
recalluk said:
From the Wail comments
While 'sterilising the poor' is a bit OTT, I quite understand the point that was being made.
When I was teaching it was always the totally unintelligent and disruptive students who went on to produce children at the earliest possible age. After a few years, there was another bunch of unintelligent and disruptive students, usually around five or six of them from the original parent. Most didn't do proper jobs and lived on benefits. Whole generations are being produced who will give nothing to society but sponge from the rest of the taxpaying public.
These young people should be deterred from having children, not encouraged by generous tax breaks and benefits to produce the maximum number possible.
- The History Man, France, 14/7/2010 12:40
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1294397/St...
This bloke is dangerous, he seems to know what he's talking about.
While 'sterilising the poor' is a bit OTT, I quite understand the point that was being made.
When I was teaching it was always the totally unintelligent and disruptive students who went on to produce children at the earliest possible age. After a few years, there was another bunch of unintelligent and disruptive students, usually around five or six of them from the original parent. Most didn't do proper jobs and lived on benefits. Whole generations are being produced who will give nothing to society but sponge from the rest of the taxpaying public.
These young people should be deterred from having children, not encouraged by generous tax breaks and benefits to produce the maximum number possible.
- The History Man, France, 14/7/2010 12:40
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1294397/St...
This bloke is dangerous, he seems to know what he's talking about.
Article said:
The Spending Challenge website has been bombarded with possibilities for savings but some are offensive and others simply bizarre – such as the proposal to limit the amount civil servants drink to stop them going to the toilet.
The writer suggested tea cups over 150ml should be banned and ‘fluid monitors’ brought in to impose fines for transgressions, claiming it could save £11billion a year
The writer suggested tea cups over 150ml should be banned and ‘fluid monitors’ brought in to impose fines for transgressions, claiming it could save £11billion a year
shakotan said:
wail said:
Other suggestions include forcing the poor to be sterilised, calling for a return of the workhouse and forcing benefits claimants to work in sweatshops.
I thought it said 'bizarre' suggestions?This one's good... I'm not sure if it's meant to be written in medeieval english, or just by someone foreign.
http://spendingchallenge.hm-treasury.gov.uk/how-ca...
http://spendingchallenge.hm-treasury.gov.uk/how-ca...
HundredthIdiot said:
"Shadow Treasury minister Angela Eagle yesterday branded the spending suggestions ‘racist and offensive’.
At Commons question time, she asked for the ‘drivel’ to be removed and the website to be moderated"
It's the internet, you stupid bint. Fail!
Less the fact that it's on the internet, more the fact that in typical Labour style, she will only allow people to make 'approved' suggestions and ensure that anything 'not-approved' is moderated out of existence. At Commons question time, she asked for the ‘drivel’ to be removed and the website to be moderated"
It's the internet, you stupid bint. Fail!
Control state at the sharp end.
Oli.
excel789 said:
From the Wail comments
While 'sterilising the poor' is a bit OTT, I quite understand the point that was being made.
When I was teaching it was always the totally unintelligent and disruptive students who went on to produce children at the earliest possible age. After a few years, there was another bunch of unintelligent and disruptive students, usually around five or six of them from the original parent. Most didn't do proper jobs and lived on benefits. Whole generations are being produced who will give nothing to society but sponge from the rest of the taxpaying public.
These young people should be deterred from having children, not encouraged by generous tax breaks and benefits to produce the maximum number possible.
- The History Man, France, 14/7/2010 12:40
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1294397/St...
This bloke is dangerous, he seems to know what he's talking about.
So the suggestion should be "sterilise the stupid" rather than "sterilise the poor"? I'd certainly subscribe to that idea.While 'sterilising the poor' is a bit OTT, I quite understand the point that was being made.
When I was teaching it was always the totally unintelligent and disruptive students who went on to produce children at the earliest possible age. After a few years, there was another bunch of unintelligent and disruptive students, usually around five or six of them from the original parent. Most didn't do proper jobs and lived on benefits. Whole generations are being produced who will give nothing to society but sponge from the rest of the taxpaying public.
These young people should be deterred from having children, not encouraged by generous tax breaks and benefits to produce the maximum number possible.
- The History Man, France, 14/7/2010 12:40
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1294397/St...
This bloke is dangerous, he seems to know what he's talking about.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff