Remind me who won WW2 again?
Discussion
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1233822/Sc...
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-ord...
In the playground article, it seems that it's fine to stand at the perimeter and w
k furiously over your own kids but just don't step into the playground itself or you'll be in trouble.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-ord...
In the playground article, it seems that it's fine to stand at the perimeter and w
k furiously over your own kids but just don't step into the playground itself or you'll be in trouble.Flintstone said:
Don't suppose there's any chance of this sort of nonsense being put away along with the laws we've all said we'd like repealed?
That's what I was thinking. I don't think it's a law as such but "recommendations" from Ofsted. Wow... what if Ofsted recommended that all parents be flogged? Or all MILF had to wear bikinis? Or all parents could only hop when entering school premises? Or all parents had to name their children "Tinkerbell"? How do I get to work for Ofsted?Oh, I suddenly recall this:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1243625/Bu...
Backlash incoming!
PS Do I spy a paedosmile?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1243625/Bu...
Backlash incoming!
PS Do I spy a paedosmile?
The Mail takes a single incident and then uses it to generate a claim that the whole of the UK will be affected by this single incident.
It is never positive.
It is always foretelling the demise of the country.
To me, the paper represents a form of "cancer" in itself - a cancer of the mind and of the national psyche.
It is never positive.
It is always foretelling the demise of the country.
To me, the paper represents a form of "cancer" in itself - a cancer of the mind and of the national psyche.
Eric Mc said:
The Mail takes a single incident and then uses it to generate a claim that the whole of the UK will be affected by this single incident.
It is never positive.
It is always foretelling the demise of the country.
To me, the paper represents a form of "cancer" in itself - a cancer of the mind and of the national psyche.
One could argue that to let single incidents, whatever the issue, go without comment allows things to spread, ignored, like a cancer.It is never positive.
It is always foretelling the demise of the country.
To me, the paper represents a form of "cancer" in itself - a cancer of the mind and of the national psyche.
Jimbeaux said:
OnTheOverrun said:
Hedders said:
"Remind me who won WW2 again?"
The USA?
I'd say Russia. The battle of Kursk alone makes D-day look like a paintball skirmish.The USA?


OnTheOverrun said:
Jimbeaux said:
OnTheOverrun said:
Hedders said:
"Remind me who won WW2 again?"
The USA?
I'd say Russia. The battle of Kursk alone makes D-day look like a paintball skirmish.The USA?



ShadownINja said:
Eric Mc said:
The Mail takes a single incident and then uses it to generate a claim that the whole of the UK will be affected by this single incident.
It is never positive.
It is always foretelling the demise of the country.
To me, the paper represents a form of "cancer" in itself - a cancer of the mind and of the national psyche.
One could argue that to let single incidents, whatever the issue, go without comment allows things to spread, ignored, like a cancer.It is never positive.
It is always foretelling the demise of the country.
To me, the paper represents a form of "cancer" in itself - a cancer of the mind and of the national psyche.
The trouble is, they NEVER report in any other way. Never a compliment, Never a congratulation. Never a positive.
Just a constant drip-feed of doom and gloom.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



