The Coalition Agreement. Worth a read.
Discussion
Sky News (with link).
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Politics/Full-Coa...
HIPs are going
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/Politics/Full-Coa...
HIPs are going
Edited by Morningside on Thursday 20th May 11:48
Tsippy said:
How long until HIPs go ? 
We're selling a flat soon so hope it's in the near future!
Tomorrow.We're selling a flat soon so hope it's in the near future!
"The requirement for packs will be suspended for anyone selling their home from 21 May, with the government needing legislation to outlaw them completely. "
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/10130254.stm
We will oblige the police to publish detailed local crime data statistics every month, so the public can get proper information about crime in their neighbourhoods and hold the police to account for their performance.
So they're going to demand that we still have detection rates and crime recording, the very things that have been blamed for the removal of discretion.
No change from Labour, in fact it means they will be even harder on forces, so expect more drive for detections than there is.
Add in that elected individual whose whole future relies on meeting targets. Someone with great incentive to fiddle and distort figures.
Everything people complain about in terms of how the police go about their business has just been made worse.
So they're going to demand that we still have detection rates and crime recording, the very things that have been blamed for the removal of discretion.
No change from Labour, in fact it means they will be even harder on forces, so expect more drive for detections than there is.
Add in that elected individual whose whole future relies on meeting targets. Someone with great incentive to fiddle and distort figures.
Everything people complain about in terms of how the police go about their business has just been made worse.
Mr_annie_vxr said:
We will oblige the police to publish detailed local crime data statistics every month, so the public can get proper information about crime in their neighbourhoods and hold the police to account for their performance.
So they're going to demand that we still have detection rates and crime recording, the very things that have been blamed for the removal of discretion.
No change from Labour, in fact it means they will be even harder on forces, so expect more drive for detections than there is.
Add in that elected individual whose whole future relies on meeting targets. Someone with great incentive to fiddle and distort figures.
Everything people complain about in terms of how the police go about their business has just been made worse.
Yes, how terrible to have to show how you've performed.So they're going to demand that we still have detection rates and crime recording, the very things that have been blamed for the removal of discretion.
No change from Labour, in fact it means they will be even harder on forces, so expect more drive for detections than there is.
Add in that elected individual whose whole future relies on meeting targets. Someone with great incentive to fiddle and distort figures.
Everything people complain about in terms of how the police go about their business has just been made worse.
Welcome to life how it is for the rest of us in the private sector.
OnTheOverrun said:
Mr_annie_vxr said:
We will oblige the police to publish detailed local crime data statistics every month, so the public can get proper information about crime in their neighbourhoods and hold the police to account for their performance.
So they're going to demand that we still have detection rates and crime recording, the very things that have been blamed for the removal of discretion.
No change from Labour, in fact it means they will be even harder on forces, so expect more drive for detections than there is.
Add in that elected individual whose whole future relies on meeting targets. Someone with great incentive to fiddle and distort figures.
Everything people complain about in terms of how the police go about their business has just been made worse.
Yes, how terrible to have to show how you've performed.So they're going to demand that we still have detection rates and crime recording, the very things that have been blamed for the removal of discretion.
No change from Labour, in fact it means they will be even harder on forces, so expect more drive for detections than there is.
Add in that elected individual whose whole future relies on meeting targets. Someone with great incentive to fiddle and distort figures.
Everything people complain about in terms of how the police go about their business has just been made worse.
Welcome to life how it is for the rest of us in the private sector.
OnTheOverrun said:
Mr_annie_vxr said:
We will oblige the police to publish detailed local crime data statistics every month, so the public can get proper information about crime in their neighbourhoods and hold the police to account for their performance.
So they're going to demand that we still have detection rates and crime recording, the very things that have been blamed for the removal of discretion.
No change from Labour, in fact it means they will be even harder on forces, so expect more drive for detections than there is.
Add in that elected individual whose whole future relies on meeting targets. Someone with great incentive to fiddle and distort figures.
Everything people complain about in terms of how the police go about their business has just been made worse.
Yes, how terrible to have to show how you've performed.So they're going to demand that we still have detection rates and crime recording, the very things that have been blamed for the removal of discretion.
No change from Labour, in fact it means they will be even harder on forces, so expect more drive for detections than there is.
Add in that elected individual whose whole future relies on meeting targets. Someone with great incentive to fiddle and distort figures.
Everything people complain about in terms of how the police go about their business has just been made worse.
Welcome to life how it is for the rest of us in the private sector.
People have been moaning about target driven policing and the impact it has had on people.
This will further encourage it and you will have someone who relies on these figures to get elected.
People moaned about Labour misusing figures. Wait til you have a person who's whole economic future depends on it.
sonic_2k_uk said:
OnTheOverrun said:
Mr_annie_vxr said:
We will oblige the police to publish detailed local crime data statistics every month, so the public can get proper information about crime in their neighbourhoods and hold the police to account for their performance.
So they're going to demand that we still have detection rates and crime recording, the very things that have been blamed for the removal of discretion.
No change from Labour, in fact it means they will be even harder on forces, so expect more drive for detections than there is.
Add in that elected individual whose whole future relies on meeting targets. Someone with great incentive to fiddle and distort figures.
Everything people complain about in terms of how the police go about their business has just been made worse.
Yes, how terrible to have to show how you've performed.So they're going to demand that we still have detection rates and crime recording, the very things that have been blamed for the removal of discretion.
No change from Labour, in fact it means they will be even harder on forces, so expect more drive for detections than there is.
Add in that elected individual whose whole future relies on meeting targets. Someone with great incentive to fiddle and distort figures.
Everything people complain about in terms of how the police go about their business has just been made worse.
Welcome to life how it is for the rest of us in the private sector.
All this stuff is already available if you go to the forces web sites.
At the moment with a limited incentive to fiddle or meddle with figures.
OnTheOverrun said:
Mr_annie_vxr said:
We will oblige the police to publish detailed local crime data statistics every month, so the public can get proper information about crime in their neighbourhoods and hold the police to account for their performance.
So they're going to demand that we still have detection rates and crime recording, the very things that have been blamed for the removal of discretion.
No change from Labour, in fact it means they will be even harder on forces, so expect more drive for detections than there is.
Add in that elected individual whose whole future relies on meeting targets. Someone with great incentive to fiddle and distort figures.
Everything people complain about in terms of how the police go about their business has just been made worse.
Yes, how terrible to have to show how you've performed.So they're going to demand that we still have detection rates and crime recording, the very things that have been blamed for the removal of discretion.
No change from Labour, in fact it means they will be even harder on forces, so expect more drive for detections than there is.
Add in that elected individual whose whole future relies on meeting targets. Someone with great incentive to fiddle and distort figures.
Everything people complain about in terms of how the police go about their business has just been made worse.
Welcome to life how it is for the rest of us in the private sector.
If you wish to treat it as such then that is when things start to go wrong for victims.
Mr_annie_vxr said:
OnTheOverrun said:
Mr_annie_vxr said:
We will oblige the police to publish detailed local crime data statistics every month, so the public can get proper information about crime in their neighbourhoods and hold the police to account for their performance.
So they're going to demand that we still have detection rates and crime recording, the very things that have been blamed for the removal of discretion.
No change from Labour, in fact it means they will be even harder on forces, so expect more drive for detections than there is.
Add in that elected individual whose whole future relies on meeting targets. Someone with great incentive to fiddle and distort figures.
Everything people complain about in terms of how the police go about their business has just been made worse.
Yes, how terrible to have to show how you've performed.So they're going to demand that we still have detection rates and crime recording, the very things that have been blamed for the removal of discretion.
No change from Labour, in fact it means they will be even harder on forces, so expect more drive for detections than there is.
Add in that elected individual whose whole future relies on meeting targets. Someone with great incentive to fiddle and distort figures.
Everything people complain about in terms of how the police go about their business has just been made worse.
Welcome to life how it is for the rest of us in the private sector.
If you wish to treat it as such then that is when things start to go wrong for victims.
AJS- said:
Sky News said:
In a joint foreword, the Prime Minister and his deputy described it as an "historic document"
Don't meant to stray too far off topic but, is it "an" rather than "a" historic document. I know you say "an hour" but generally h is counted as a consonant, no?AndyAudi said:
AJS- said:
Sky News said:
In a joint foreword, the Prime Minister and his deputy described it as an "historic document"
Don't meant to stray too far off topic but, is it "an" rather than "a" historic document. I know you say "an hour" but generally h is counted as a consonant, no?
AJS- said:
Sky News said:
In a joint foreword, the Prime Minister and his deputy described it as an "historic document"
Don't meant to stray too far off topic but, is it "an" rather than "a" historic document. I know you say "an hour" but generally h is counted as a consonant, no?Anyway, blame the Romans for this because they were prone to drop the H from certain words.When these words passed to French and English the H has disappeared from both the written and the spoken form of earlier words for horrible, habit, and harmony (orryble, abit, and armonye in old English), therefore it's perfectly normal to use an "AN" instead of an "A" in "an orryble day".
Of course the above explanation only applies to words derived from Latin.There is also Eastenders too...
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff