The real size of UK debt
Author
Discussion

sassthathoopie

Original Poster:

969 posts

245 months

Thursday 29th April 2010
quotequote all
Did anyone else listen to Radio 4 on the way home this evening?

Apparently the UK debt figure generally banded about doesn't include PFI agreements or public sector pensions.

Each household in Britain owes £90,000 once this is taken into account...

Hopefully someone who wasn't driving the A31 with the roof down driving will have got all the details of the discussion!

eldar

25,292 posts

226 months

Thursday 29th April 2010
quotequote all
25.5 million households, total debt, if you include public sector borrowing as announced in the budget until 2014, £90k each.

Exclude the budget, so current debt £65k / household.

Or so they said.

SmoothRB

1,700 posts

202 months

Thursday 29th April 2010
quotequote all
Yeah it's mental.

cs02rm0

13,958 posts

221 months

Thursday 29th April 2010
quotequote all
Is that just national debt, i.e. not including credit card debt?

Puggit

49,813 posts

278 months

Thursday 29th April 2010
quotequote all
cs02rm0 said:
Is that just national debt, i.e. not including credit card debt?
Yep - that's 'just' the government debt

Political Pain

983 posts

198 months

Thursday 29th April 2010
quotequote all
That is about but the BBC forgot the clawback on the PFI projects, the Merchant Banks hav to make returns as well, so the figure is about £75,000 in real terms per household if you run full term liabilities.

There is also [sadly] an add on that makes the figure worse.

The PFI terms will start to run out from 2015... slowly incrementally hospitals, schools, even the odd council building will face further tranches of payments or eviction, so it will be in about 2020 when there WILL be hospitals facing this and we will have to pay for the PFI all over again, an ever on-going £15k of debt on every household for the rest of time... the banks eh!

Have been screaming blue murder over this for the past 10 years, Private Eye has even published some of them.

Every time ol'flubber-chops speaks of all the schools and hospitals 'he' has built I shudder, he directly changed PFI in 1998 to make the whole process risk proof for the bankers... and boy-oh-boy don't they know it.

Political Pain

983 posts

198 months

Thursday 29th April 2010
quotequote all
fbrs said:
Now you know why there are so many Quangos, the majority of the Health and Education trusts are not even recorded in those figures!

Quangos cost us money in so so many ways.

dxg

10,761 posts

290 months

Thursday 29th April 2010
quotequote all
Political Pain said:
That is about but the BBC forgot the clawback on the PFI projects, the Merchant Banks hav to make returns as well, so the figure is about £75,000 in real terms per household if you run full term liabilities.

There is also [sadly] an add on that makes the figure worse.

The PFI terms will start to run out from 2015... slowly incrementally hospitals, schools, even the odd council building will face further tranches of payments or eviction, so it will be in about 2020 when there WILL be hospitals facing this and we will have to pay for the PFI all over again, an ever on-going £15k of debt on every household for the rest of time... the banks eh!

Have been screaming blue murder over this for the past 10 years, Private Eye has even published some of them.

Every time ol'flubber-chops speaks of all the schools and hospitals 'he' has built I shudder, he directly changed PFI in 1998 to make the whole process risk proof for the bankers... and boy-oh-boy don't they know it.
I agree with your last point, but you're mistaken if you think all the capital assets created by PFI schemes revert to private ownership at the end of the concession period. Depends on the format of the scheme. Of course, those that do pass into public sector ownership will then have to be operated and maintained somehow...

tamore

9,999 posts

314 months

Thursday 29th April 2010
quotequote all
this is the scary stuff CMD and clogg should be hammering his royal bigotness with tonight

Scooby72

725 posts

211 months

Thursday 29th April 2010
quotequote all
I don't think a lot of people even really understand the difference between the 'debt' and the 'deficit'

Labours plan to half the deficit only means they are going to cut what they borrow each year to make up for the short fall in what they spend and what they get in tax revenue.

In other words the the already massive debt will still continue to get bigger.

Political Pain

983 posts

198 months

Thursday 29th April 2010
quotequote all
The beauty is in the wording, the land always returns to owner [state,county,authority] but the building is designed for a period economic use, and designed as such and in every project I was involved in [approx £1bn] the contued use re-fit clause is there for term end minus 18months.

Uncle Fester

3,114 posts

238 months

Thursday 29th April 2010
quotequote all
Perhaps if the government allowed all those who could pay their £90k now to live tax free thereafter, they would raise a substantial slice and repay much of the national debt now. It would save a fortune in interest.

eldar

25,292 posts

226 months

Thursday 29th April 2010
quotequote all
Political Pain said:
That is about but the BBC forgot the clawback on the PFI projects, the Merchant Banks hav to make returns as well, so the figure is about £75,000 in real terms per household if you run full term liabilities.

There is also [sadly] an add on that makes the figure worse.

The PFI terms will start to run out from 2015... slowly incrementally hospitals, schools, even the odd council building will face further tranches of payments or eviction, so it will be in about 2020 when there WILL be hospitals facing this and we will have to pay for the PFI all over again, an ever on-going £15k of debt on every household for the rest of time... the banks eh!

Have been screaming blue murder over this for the past 10 years, Private Eye has even published some of them.

Every time ol'flubber-chops speaks of all the schools and hospitals 'he' has built I shudder, he directly changed PFI in 1998 to make the whole process risk proof for the bankers... and boy-oh-boy don't they know it.
They did specifically mention PFI. About 50 minutes into PM on Radio 4 today. £300bn I think.

cs02rm0

13,958 posts

221 months

Thursday 29th April 2010
quotequote all
Scooby72 said:
I don't think a lot of people even really understand the difference between the 'debt' and the 'deficit'

Labours plan to half the deficit...
I think that's a key point and this deficit cutting policy just seems misleading the way Gordon is so proud of it, he should be ashamed we have one!

tamore

9,999 posts

314 months

Thursday 29th April 2010
quotequote all
cs02rm0 said:
Scooby72 said:
I don't think a lot of people even really understand the difference between the 'debt' and the 'deficit'

Labours plan to half the deficit...
I think that's a key point and this deficit cutting policy just seems misleading the way Gordon is so proud of it, he should be ashamed we have one!
certainly shouldn't have had one from '97 - 2008

don4l

10,058 posts

206 months

Thursday 29th April 2010
quotequote all
PFI's are deception that gets government debts off the balance sheet. The government uses this money to buy the votes of the unemployed. Unfortunately, those that are left in employment are just left with a bigger bill to pay.


Don
--

M3333

2,347 posts

244 months

Thursday 29th April 2010
quotequote all
teachers ahole important rofl

Busa_Rush

6,930 posts

281 months

Thursday 29th April 2010
quotequote all
I used to work for a company involved in the PFI business . . . they loved it, exceptionally good business, they dropped everything else for PFI's !

Political Pain

983 posts

198 months

Thursday 29th April 2010
quotequote all
Busa_Rush said:
I used to work for a company involved in the PFI business . . . they loved it, exceptionally good business, they dropped everything else for PFI's !
It is a fabulous business to be in, the fees are lucrative, the salaries are marvellous, the perks are abundant and the profits are assured.

The client loves you, the builder is assured of work and you can usually you can rope them in for a small cream through minor partnerships and the bankers are cock-a-hoop.

Everyone wins...

Except the tax/rate/council tax payer.

But he is the last person to know, by then it's waaaaaayyyyy too late.