Queen Mom

Author
Discussion

Graham

Original Poster:

16,369 posts

291 months

Thursday 4th April 2002
quotequote all
Just a thought but i wondered what the Ph readership though of the passing of the queen mom.

I've been down the pub tonight and we had a chat and we all thought top woman....


how many people do you know that gave 80 odd years to a sence of duty to the people that they served..


can you imagine Tony < im a **** twat face > blair actually having that kind of commitment...

just a thought


G

PetrolTed

34,443 posts

310 months

Thursday 4th April 2002
quotequote all
Don't get me started on the Royal Family...

Graham

Original Poster:

16,369 posts

291 months

Thursday 4th April 2002
quotequote all
for or against...?



just interested.....

smeagol

1,947 posts

291 months

Thursday 4th April 2002
quotequote all
How many people would give that sense of duty for that amount of money?

Graham

Original Poster:

16,369 posts

291 months

Thursday 4th April 2002
quotequote all
and the 24 X 7 tabloid scrutiney

how much do you value your privacy and the chance to bugger off down the pub

i do belive the Qm had a 4 million quid over draft and they had to borrow to buy buk house


where as TB pays jack shit to up the country and live in no 10 and no 11 < no 10 wasnt big enough for his ego>

>> Edited by Graham on Thursday 4th April 02:05

kevinday

12,306 posts

287 months

Thursday 4th April 2002
quotequote all
I will admit to being a fan of the Royal Family in general. The Queen Mother was a really excellent lady with a real sense of duty.
On the money side, all the household wages and other costs come out of the 'income', you have no privacy and are subject to tabloid coverage all the time, this compares with prison in my opinion albeit a gilded prison. Sounds like a raw deal.
I have also met Princess Anne, who is another top lady.

filmidget

682 posts

289 months

Thursday 4th April 2002
quotequote all
Nah...

Especially now the Queen Mother has gone, sack the lot of them.

If the yanks like them so much (Royalists reckon the family are so great for tourist etc) then ship off over there. In fact you think Americans would pay for them? Give them a liitle more (instant) 'history'?

"What would you pay for an heir to the thrown? Audition other members of the Royal family with no obligation to buy. Get a number of free servants and hangers on if you pay by credit card today. (this offer is not available in the shops)"

Cheers, Phil

marki

15,763 posts

277 months

Thursday 4th April 2002
quotequote all
quote:

How many people would give that sense of duty for that amount of money?



Exactly,,,, 80 years ,,, oh yeah what hard labour that was ,she seemed a good old girl but lets not get carried away .

marki

15,763 posts

277 months

Thursday 4th April 2002
quotequote all
quote:

i do belive the Qm had a 4 million quid over draft and they had to borrow to buy buk house




She also has several "trust funds" set up worth
+- £90m she had the OD because all her assets were put in these trust funds a few years ago to beat the tax man hmmmm ,, the more i think of her the more i like her

Ali_D

1,115 posts

291 months

Thursday 4th April 2002
quotequote all
I think she was a top girl but had to laugh when I heard the first Queen Mum joke the other day:

Why are the Queen Mother and ITV digital similar?

They both f***ed up last weekend's TV schedules!!

>> Edited by Ali_D on Thursday 4th April 09:24

manek

2,977 posts

291 months

Thursday 4th April 2002
quotequote all
Sack the lot of them!

If you believe in democracy that is and don't want to be just an extra in a theme park for tourists, which is how Britain is perceived in the rest of the world. Let's bring our state apparatus up to date rather than be a place where heritage means stuff that happened hundreds of years ago but has little relevance to the 21st century.

Not that I've got an opinion or anything...

yertis

18,683 posts

273 months

Thursday 4th April 2002
quotequote all
If you check your history Manek you'll find that once upon a time we did sack the lot of them, and chopped of their heads for good measure. But being the fun-loving lot we are we soon tired of Cromwell's puritanical, kill-joy government and reinstated Royalty a few years later. So BTDT.

Hopefully now Ma has died the Queen will step out the way and let Charlie-boy have a fair crack of the whip.

yertis

18,683 posts

273 months

Thursday 4th April 2002
quotequote all
And also while I'm at it it's dangerous to assume that "democracy" is automatically a good thing and I find the expression "state apparatus" somewhat sinister. Our system may not be perfect but it still compares favourably with many other territories.

manek

2,977 posts

291 months

Thursday 4th April 2002
quotequote all
Yertis, I have grave doubts about democracy too. But I don't have a better answer (when I was younger I thought I did but have since changed my mind). It's theleast worst system. As for state apparatus, I mean the state -- the machinery which consists of government (national and local), judiciary, and all the officially sanctioned systems that make the place work. Not meant to be sinister

CarZee

13,382 posts

274 months

Thursday 4th April 2002
quotequote all
Well, I'm pretty uninterested by the Royal Family as a whole. I think that they're entitled to their life like anyone else - even those who were born into money - and they're pretty benign really. Though perhaps they should be kicked out and perhaps we should have a written constitution and an elected president, but I don't see any benefit in moving to a US style system. Or for that matter a French or German style system, which is the more likely, being as they are both former Monarchies, unlike the US which is formerly a very large beach.

For me, the main problem with democracy today is people. Many of them are simpletons and numpties who are bamboozled by the stream of half-truths and lies peddled by the politicians, media and advertisers. They are therefore easily persuaded to acquiesce to whatever nonsense those in power decide to do.

By 'those in power', I'm not necessarily talking about politicians either - it seems that there is a creeping defacto coup d'etat taking place across the world and it's the multinational corporations who are gaining control over our lives. National borders are becoming less and less relevant and national governments less and less powerful in the face of supranational organisations such as WTO, IMF, World Bank, EU etc.

However, like others here, I cannot conceive of a better way forward than democracy - the alternatives are all unpalatable in some significant way. Unless I was in charge of course

But seriously, on my list of who would die this year, I've got 3 out of 10 already and I've got the Royal family to thank for two of those

M@H

11,298 posts

279 months

Thursday 4th April 2002
quotequote all


(insert "land of hope and glory"/"national anthem" etc. here)

JMorgan

36,010 posts

291 months

Thursday 4th April 2002
quotequote all
Nothing against the royals, bit for them really providing they don't start taking the micky. Charles I listened to the ball and chain too much so had to go. Didn't Charles II dig up Oliver C's corpse and hang it?

nonegreen

7,803 posts

277 months

Thursday 4th April 2002
quotequote all
Our Royal family are a load of free loaders and parasites. The contribute nothing and I am sick of being a bloody subject. It is time we had a written constitution and were all citizens. My great aunt died the same day as the QM, she had about 10 times the QMs brains and really did sit out the blitz not, piss off every night to windsor. No fanfare no media coverage just a very bright and humorous old lady who lived her life and died like all of us will. So what was so special about the QM? Absolutely sod all. Almost anyone with half a brain could have done that job, probably better.

As for democracy well, there is probably room for a motorist revolutionary party

Fatboy

8,089 posts

279 months

Thursday 4th April 2002
quotequote all
As winston Churchill said:

'Democracy is the worst form of government - Apart from all the other types that have been tried'

yertis

18,683 posts

273 months

Thursday 4th April 2002
quotequote all
I just had a quick peep at the Magna Carta (on the basis that it's a sort of constitution/bill of rights) and saw Para. 30:

(30) No sheriff, royal official, or other person shall take horses or carts for transport from any free man, without his consent.

So presumably ALL the tow-away outfits and clamping-bandits are acting outside the law. Or has this one been repealed?