Hubby a terrorist... dont worry you will still get benefits.
Discussion
Small pee warmer today.
So your hubby is a terrorist in the UK, you knew about it and possibly helped him, he got caught and the UK stopped your benefits... All is good!!
Now some jumped up judge in the EU is trying to dictate how the UK should spend its money by reinstating the benefits of the immediate family of suspected terrorists and attempted acts of terror:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/6994194/Wiv...
WTF... I mean why are they still in the country? The immediate family would have been deported if I was in charge, they knew about it and even if they didnt ignorance is no defence and they should be shipped out for not even attempting to turn their hubby in.
So your hubby is a terrorist in the UK, you knew about it and possibly helped him, he got caught and the UK stopped your benefits... All is good!!
Now some jumped up judge in the EU is trying to dictate how the UK should spend its money by reinstating the benefits of the immediate family of suspected terrorists and attempted acts of terror:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/6994194/Wiv...
WTF... I mean why are they still in the country? The immediate family would have been deported if I was in charge, they knew about it and even if they didnt ignorance is no defence and they should be shipped out for not even attempting to turn their hubby in.
fildigger said:
Here we go again...
The number of threads about Immegrant's/Terrorists on PH is obviously a reflection of the common concensus of the British public feeling (and mine!)
Looking forward to this thread..........
Not too interested in the 'Terrorist' aspect of the thread, if I'm perfectly honest, but I do find the EU meddling aspect quite interesting.The number of threads about Immegrant's/Terrorists on PH is obviously a reflection of the common concensus of the British public feeling (and mine!)
Looking forward to this thread..........
Maybe that is a little OT though, and not the intended direction of the thread.
fildigger said:
Here we go again...
The number of threads about Immegrant's/Terrorists on PH is obviously a reflection of the common concensus of the British public feeling (and mine!)
Looking forward to this thread..........
Its the EU aspect that I posted on you tard...The number of threads about Immegrant's/Terrorists on PH is obviously a reflection of the common concensus of the British public feeling (and mine!)
Looking forward to this thread..........
terrorists and their like have been done to death on PH and the view is the norm that they need to be strung up by their balls, etc...
Dupont666 said:
Small pee warmer today.
So your hubby is a terrorist in the UK, you knew about it and possibly helped him, he got caught and the UK stopped your benefits... All is good!!
Now some jumped up judge in the EU is trying to dictate how the UK should spend its money by reinstating the benefits of the immediate family of suspected terrorists and attempted acts of terror:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/6994194/Wiv...
WTF... I mean why are they still in the country? The immediate family would have been deported if I was in charge, they knew about it and even if they didnt ignorance is no defence and they should be shipped out for not even attempting to turn their hubby in.
Knew about what? So you want to punish the relatives of suspects—people who haven't even been convicted of a crime? Even if those people were guilty, you then want to punish their relatives, who haven't committed a crime?So your hubby is a terrorist in the UK, you knew about it and possibly helped him, he got caught and the UK stopped your benefits... All is good!!
Now some jumped up judge in the EU is trying to dictate how the UK should spend its money by reinstating the benefits of the immediate family of suspected terrorists and attempted acts of terror:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/6994194/Wiv...
WTF... I mean why are they still in the country? The immediate family would have been deported if I was in charge, they knew about it and even if they didnt ignorance is no defence and they should be shipped out for not even attempting to turn their hubby in.
Great. Maybe we should remove all benefits from women who've unknowingly been married to paedophiles and bank robbers. The dirty b
hes, how dare they be married to a criminal!f
k me, the average IQ in here continues on a downward slope.Dupont666 said:
Its the EU aspect that I posted on you tard...
terrorists and their like have been done to death on PH and the view is the norm that they need to be strung up by their balls, etc...
Ah, I was on the right page then terrorists and their like have been done to death on PH and the view is the norm that they need to be strung up by their balls, etc...
And yes, we're going to see a lot more of this thing.
We already heard the other day about the EU ruling random 'Stop & search' illegal.
I was saying this in another thread, these sorts of rulings are what is most worrying about the EU. And I am pretty certain the rest of teh EU are with us on this. Unelected officials and non nationals seem to be able to change fundamental aspects of a nations sovereignty over what seem like very minor issues.
Making rulings like: You can't deport someone as they now have a child. Or: You can't cut benefits to this person despite them being a potential threat to your security. These leave a country open to all sorts of abuses by their own and other citizens. And don't forget as these are EU rulings they apply to every member now.
And then again the EU does some good stuff. If only they could work out which we like and which we need and get rid of the rest. Cheaply and without backhanders to their mates and I may just become a supporter of the EU as a body.
Mikeyboy
Making rulings like: You can't deport someone as they now have a child. Or: You can't cut benefits to this person despite them being a potential threat to your security. These leave a country open to all sorts of abuses by their own and other citizens. And don't forget as these are EU rulings they apply to every member now.
And then again the EU does some good stuff. If only they could work out which we like and which we need and get rid of the rest. Cheaply and without backhanders to their mates and I may just become a supporter of the EU as a body.
Mikeyboy
Eric Mc said:
Should a wife suffer for the sins of the husband? Or vise versa?
What if they aren't actually married?
What about other relatives?
Where do you stop?
I think another key word which people seem to have overlooked in the article is "suspects", ie they've not been found guilty of anything yet. What if they aren't actually married?
What about other relatives?
Where do you stop?
And if they are found guilty and imprisoned in the UK then what do their families live on? I really don't have a problem with deporting them provided they aren't British citizens, but in a civilised country you can't leave somebody with no means to survive legally.
Eric Mc said:
Should a wife suffer for the sins of the husband? Or vise versa?
What if they aren't actually married?
What about other relatives?
Where do you stop?
Show me a case when a wife doesnt know the complete ins and outs of a hubbies personal life?What if they aren't actually married?
What about other relatives?
Where do you stop?
If they do not know, then more fool them... hubby is making a bomb in the other room or planning to do some other terror attack and they dont know... Please!!
Mondeohdear said:
Eric Mc said:
Should a wife suffer for the sins of the husband? Or vise versa?
What if they aren't actually married?
What about other relatives?
Where do you stop?
I think another key word which people seem to have overlooked in the article is "suspects", ie they've not been found guilty of anything yet. What if they aren't actually married?
What about other relatives?
Where do you stop?
And if they are found guilty and imprisoned in the UK then what do their families live on? I really don't have a problem with deporting them provided they aren't British citizens, but in a civilised country you can't leave somebody with no means to survive legally.
Dupont666 said:
Eric Mc said:
Should a wife suffer for the sins of the husband? Or vise versa?
What if they aren't actually married?
What about other relatives?
Where do you stop?
Show me a case when a wife doesnt know the complete ins and outs of a hubbies personal life?What if they aren't actually married?
What about other relatives?
Where do you stop?
If they do not know, then more fool them... hubby is making a bomb in the other room or planning to do some other terror attack and they dont know... Please!!
UK law prosecutes individuals - not their friends and relations (unless there is a case against them too). And thank God for that. Merely being associated with someone does not mean that you are guilty of a crime the relative committed.
Dupont666 said:
Show me a case when a wife doesnt know the complete ins and outs of a hubbies personal life?
If they do not know, then more fool them... hubby is making a bomb in the other room or planning to do some other terror attack and they dont know... Please!!
Seriously, don't you have any mates who are having or have had an affair? And did their wives know about it? If they do not know, then more fool them... hubby is making a bomb in the other room or planning to do some other terror attack and they dont know... Please!!
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff