Hoon says "Winky is the one that stopped the helicopters"
Hoon says "Winky is the one that stopped the helicopters"
Author
Discussion

Skywalker

Original Poster:

3,269 posts

244 months

Saturday 9th January 2010
quotequote all
Just popped up on the Thunderer

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/art...

Summary: Leaked cabinet letters showing that Hoon wanted cash for helos when he was DefSec and Brown as Chancellor said no - therefore it's his fault.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

285 months

Saturday 9th January 2010
quotequote all
Why doesn't that surprise me...?

Fittster

20,120 posts

243 months

Saturday 9th January 2010
quotequote all
FFS. Hardly news, Chancellor stops department spending too much.


Skywalker

Original Poster:

3,269 posts

244 months

Saturday 9th January 2010
quotequote all
More the fact that Hoon it appears is attempting to take Our Glorious Leader down, even after he is now a prisoner of his Cabinet and been made to look a total tt by Darling today as well.

turbobloke

117,219 posts

290 months

Saturday 9th January 2010
quotequote all
Good news.

Hopefully there are more lining up to take a pot-shot.

Fittster

20,120 posts

243 months

Saturday 9th January 2010
quotequote all
However his colleagues attempts don't appear to be damaging the Labour party in the polls.

"The ICM survey for The Sunday Telegraph shows Labour on 30 per cent, one point higher than last month's poll, despite the party squabbles.
The Conservatives are unchanged on 40 per cent and the Liberal Democrats down one point on 18 per cent.

Repeated in a general election, the figures would give the Conservatives a very small Commons majority of roughly 16 seats"

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/election-2010/6957...

Not going to be able to make big changes with a majority of 16.

turbobloke

117,219 posts

290 months

Saturday 9th January 2010
quotequote all
The fat lady hasn't even gargled yet, the singing is way off.

Fittster

20,120 posts

243 months

Saturday 9th January 2010
quotequote all
The system needs to be seen to have failed before it can be replaced. A weak government or hung parliament would make for an entertaining few years.

turbobloke

117,219 posts

290 months

Saturday 9th January 2010
quotequote all
Fittster said:
The system needs to be seen to have failed before it can be replaced. A weak government or hung parliament would make for an entertaining few years.
eek

From the outside maybe - which is after all a good idea.

eharding

14,648 posts

314 months

Saturday 9th January 2010
quotequote all
Fittster said:
However his colleagues attempts don't appear to be damaging the Labour party in the polls.

"The ICM survey for The Sunday Telegraph shows Labour on 30 per cent, one point higher than last month's poll, despite the party squabbles.
The Conservatives are unchanged on 40 per cent and the Liberal Democrats down one point on 18 per cent.

Repeated in a general election, the figures would give the Conservatives a very small Commons majority of roughly 16 seats"

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/election-2010/6957...

Not going to be able to make big changes with a majority of 16.
You only need a majority of 1.

The new Tory MP intake will have been well aware of the horror of the final months of John Major's administration, and the fundamental dividing issue - Europe - has largely been decided by the Labour government since 1997. It'll take a few years before a majority of 16 becomes a problem.

That being said, I am rather amazed at that opinion poll result, but who knows - it could be a double bluff by the Tory press to get Winky to press the election button.

ninja-lewis

5,434 posts

220 months

Saturday 9th January 2010
quotequote all
Skywalker said:
Just popped up on the Thunderer

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/art...

Summary: Leaked cabinet letters showing that Hoon wanted cash for helos when he was DefSec and Brown as Chancellor said no - therefore it's his fault.
Hang, Hoon hasn't said that. In fact he hasn't said anything. All that's happened is someone has leaked letters between Hoon and Brown. The Sunday Times have then mentioned that Hoon has recently plotted against Brown and will soon be up before the Chilcot inquiry.

What if this leak is nothing to do with Hoon? What if a third party has leaked these letters? Normally if these letters came out, Brown would get blamed and then it gets forgotten about. But in this case, someone might be reminding Hoon that he now has very little to lose by telling the Chilcot inquiry all about how "Brown stopped me doing this and that".

I reckon someone has seen the chance to force Hoon's hand right up Brown's arse. It just seems slightly more shrewd than your average political plot/leak/revenge.

eharding

14,648 posts

314 months

Saturday 9th January 2010
quotequote all
ninja-lewis said:
Skywalker said:
Just popped up on the Thunderer

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/art...

Summary: Leaked cabinet letters showing that Hoon wanted cash for helos when he was DefSec and Brown as Chancellor said no - therefore it's his fault.
Hang, Hoon hasn't said that. In fact he hasn't said anything. All that's happened is someone has leaked letters between Hoon and Brown. The Sunday Times have then mentioned that Hoon has recently plotted against Brown and will soon be up before the Chilcot inquiry.

What if this leak is nothing to do with Hoon? What if a third party has leaked these letters? Normally if these letters came out, Brown would get blamed and then it gets forgotten about. But in this case, someone might be reminding Hoon that he now has very little to lose by telling the Chilcot inquiry all about how "Brown stopped me doing this and that".

I reckon someone has seen the chance to force Hoon's hand right up Brown's arse. It just seems slightly more shrewd than your average political plot/leak/revenge.
In which case, I would strongly advise Buff not to take a walk in the woods in the immediate future.

tzfan

3,091 posts

206 months

Saturday 9th January 2010
quotequote all
ninja-lewis said:
I reckon someone has seen the chance to force Hoon's hand right up Brown's arse. It just seems slightly more shrewd than your average political plot/leak/revenge.
Mandy?

A strong stench of intrigue here methinks...

king arthur

7,881 posts

291 months

Saturday 9th January 2010
quotequote all
Fittster said:
However his colleagues attempts don't appear to be damaging the Labour party in the polls.

"The ICM survey for The Sunday Telegraph shows Labour on 30 per cent, one point higher than last month's poll, despite the party squabbles.
The Conservatives are unchanged on 40 per cent and the Liberal Democrats down one point on 18 per cent.

Repeated in a general election, the figures would give the Conservatives a very small Commons majority of roughly 16 seats"

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/election-2010/6957...

Not going to be able to make big changes with a majority of 16.
UK Polling Report say that 30% is a one percent drop for Labour over last month, not a one percent increase, so who is right?

Taita

7,997 posts

233 months

Saturday 9th January 2010
quotequote all
ninja-lewis said:
Skywalker said:
Just popped up on the Thunderer

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/art...

Summary: Leaked cabinet letters showing that Hoon wanted cash for helos when he was DefSec and Brown as Chancellor said no - therefore it's his fault.
Hang, Hoon hasn't said that. In fact he hasn't said anything. All that's happened is someone has leaked letters between Hoon and Brown. The Sunday Times have then mentioned that Hoon has recently plotted against Brown and will soon be up before the Chilcot inquiry.

What if this leak is nothing to do with Hoon? What if a third party has leaked these letters? Normally if these letters came out, Brown would get blamed and then it gets forgotten about. But in this case, someone might be reminding Hoon that he now has very little to lose by telling the Chilcot inquiry all about how "Brown stopped me doing this and that".

I reckon someone has seen the chance to force Hoon's hand right up Brown's arse. It just seems slightly more shrewd than your average political plot/leak/revenge.
Do you post on ARSSE?

ninja-lewis

5,434 posts

220 months

Saturday 9th January 2010
quotequote all
king arthur said:
Fittster said:
However his colleagues attempts don't appear to be damaging the Labour party in the polls.

"The ICM survey for The Sunday Telegraph shows Labour on 30 per cent, one point higher than last month's poll, despite the party squabbles.
The Conservatives are unchanged on 40 per cent and the Liberal Democrats down one point on 18 per cent.

Repeated in a general election, the figures would give the Conservatives a very small Commons majority of roughly 16 seats"

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/election-2010/6957...

Not going to be able to make big changes with a majority of 16.
UK Polling Report say that 30% is a one percent drop for Labour over last month, not a one percent increase, so who is right?
Both are right.

Telegraph took the 1 point increase from their previous Telegraph/ICM poll, which was published 5th December. This showed Labour on 29%.

What UK Polling Report have done is used the most recent ICM poll, which was carried out for the Guardian a week later (published 14 December). It's the same poll/methodology, just commissioned by a different paper. This showed Labour up to 31%.

Basically as your link pointed, the Telegraph were being a bit childish by ignoring polls carried out by other newspapers and only referring to their own. An extreme example would be comparing last year's result and last month's result. So technically they are both correct. It's just the latter is more correct if you want to know how support for Labour is trending in more detail.

WhoseGeneration

4,090 posts

237 months

Saturday 9th January 2010
quotequote all
Fittster said:
FFS. Hardly news, Chancellor stops department spending too much.
Might depend upon which Department?

Pesty

42,655 posts

286 months

Saturday 9th January 2010
quotequote all
he is standing down this time isnt he? Thats fking brave of him.

If he would have said this a few years ago...

ahh fk it these s will be history soon, replacd by another bunch of s

OnTheOverrun

3,965 posts

207 months

Saturday 9th January 2010
quotequote all
Fittster said:
FFS. Hardly news, Chancellor stops department spending money to save troops lives and allows it to be spent saving greedy incompetent bankers.
  • EFA

FourWheelDrift

92,307 posts

314 months

Saturday 9th January 2010
quotequote all
Mail on Sunday's front page tomorrorow/today.



http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1241989/Pe...

Edited by FourWheelDrift on Saturday 9th January 23:59