Darling vs Osborne
Author
Discussion

rocksteadyeddie

Original Poster:

7,971 posts

257 months

Sunday 6th December 2009
quotequote all
Both were on Andrew Marr this morning.

I find myself siding with Darling who I thought made a considerably better fist of the questions put to him, and who looked and sounded considerably more credible. On banking bonuses, inheritance tax, reducing the deficit, tackling public spending I thought that Darling gave the more convincing arguments. Oh, and Osborne does seem to have a habit of coming across as a bit of a school-swat weasel type character.

I feel sullied.

Please shoot me down in flames so I can get rid of this grubby feeling.

andy400

11,691 posts

261 months

Sunday 6th December 2009
quotequote all
WRT Darling, I've said it before and I'll say it again, can you really trust a man with the economy when he's clearly not to be trusted with the state of his own eyebrows?

Oilchange

9,707 posts

290 months

Sunday 6th December 2009
quotequote all
I disagree, Darling certainly got a harder time from Marr and was on the back foot.

deadslow

8,791 posts

253 months

Sunday 6th December 2009
quotequote all
I think Osbnorne is an electoral liability. Lightweight.

Oilchange

9,707 posts

290 months

Sunday 6th December 2009
quotequote all
Everyone seems to be a 'lightweight' until they've been in power for xxx years etc. I'd trust him over any of Gordons cronies in a heartbeat.
Remember how much experience and stature this Labour lot had in '97? No, neither do I...

norby1

472 posts

203 months

Sunday 6th December 2009
quotequote all
Darling vs Osbourne.... There's only 1 way to find out....... FIGHT !!!!!!

Halb

53,012 posts

213 months

Sunday 6th December 2009
quotequote all
rocksteadyeddie said:
Both were on Andrew Marr this morning.

I find myself siding with Darling who I thought made a considerably better fist of the questions put to him, and who looked and sounded considerably more credible. On banking bonuses, inheritance tax, reducing the deficit, tackling public spending I thought that Darling gave the more convincing arguments. Oh, and Osborne does seem to have a habit of coming across as a bit of a school-swat weasel type character.

I feel sullied.

Please shoot me down in flames so I can get rid of this grubby feeling.
Oh goodie DC!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5wWXJo9MDw

rocksteadyeddie

Original Poster:

7,971 posts

257 months

Sunday 6th December 2009
quotequote all
Oilchange said:
Everyone seems to be a 'lightweight' until they've been in power for xxx years etc. I'd trust him over any of Gordons cronies in a heartbeat.
Remember how much experience and stature this Labour lot had in '97? No, neither do I...
I think that is a fair point. Clearly I can't possibly vote for the incumbent monkeys with a clear conscience, but (with the notable exception of Hague) the current senior Tories just don't feel right to me.

Mclovin

1,679 posts

228 months

Sunday 6th December 2009
quotequote all
its unlikely the tories will reveal any of their policies, if they did they would just be copied or used for spin...

deadslow

8,791 posts

253 months

Sunday 6th December 2009
quotequote all
Mclovin said:
its unlikely the tories will reveal any of their policies, if they did they would just be copied or used for spin...
However, if they were actually idealogically 'Tory' policies, and not just cheap vote grabbers, then they could not be stolen by Labour.


FourWheelDrift

92,306 posts

314 months

Sunday 6th December 2009
quotequote all
rocksteadyeddie said:
Both were on Andrew Marr this morning.
Did you hear them talking about English public school educated Tory leader David Cameron?

Bit rich coming from two Scottish public school educated tts. Both ex-Loretto boarders, proof that st tends to sticks together.