Sunrise / Sunset photo advice
Sunrise / Sunset photo advice
Author
Discussion

james_tigerwoods

Original Poster:

16,347 posts

227 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
Driving in this morning on the M180 was dull - it always is - frankly, I'd rather shove wasps... Anyway...

When I left home and drove to the motorway I noticed that the sunrise was, to be honest, fantastic and it made me want to pull over and take a photo of it - overlooking the fact that that would have been dangerous, I'd not scoped out where I'd photograph from and, most crucially, I didn't have my camera with me.

But it set me thinking - Last year, not long after I got my camera, I made an attempt at sunset photos and, to be honest, the results were poor - the best one was this:



All I'd achieved was to get very cold and very pissed off.

I've learnt a lot about photography in the past year so I at least now know how to focus and a bit about exposure times and that, a cloudless sky will not necessarily produce nice photos and to shoot in RAW. I've read a bit about sunset and sunrise photos, but I've made the mistake of reading more than one source about this and the advice is slightly different between the articles and that's left me slightly confused.

So, my question is this - are there any good general points that I need to remember when I'm stood, freezing my ass off at dawn/dusk taking sunrise/sunset photos?

Thanks

JTW

paul911

2,771 posts

263 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
There’s such a huge contrast difference between the bright sky and dark ground. Stick a grad filter on to even it out. Or try a HDR, or blend two images metered from both areas.

andy-xr

13,204 posts

234 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
Check this page out: http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&a...

And especially this!

GetCarter said:
If you get a grad grey, you will darken the sky, so the camera will under expose the foreground less. The only other way of doing it is to take multiple shots and HDR or digitally blend.

Why water is so good is that the bright sky is reflected, so the forground doesn't under expose.

ETA - this was taken using a grey grad, as the sky was much brighter than the sea.. but the grey evens it out



Edited by GetCarter on Wednesday 20th May 13:44

SamHH

5,078 posts

246 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
Don't make the mistake of seeing a pretty sunset and just photographing the sky; you've got to have something good in the foreground too. Your photo is boring because although the sky is nice, you've just got a big slab of silhouetted land filling the bottom half of the frame; there's nothing interesting there.

As with most photography, composition is the most important thing.

james_tigerwoods

Original Poster:

16,347 posts

227 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
SamHH said:
Don't make the mistake of seeing a pretty sunset and just photographing the sky; you've got to have something good in the foreground too. Your photo is boring because although the sky is nice, you've just got a big slab of silhouetted land filling the bottom half of the frame; there's nothing interesting there.

As with most photography, composition is the most important thing.
That is something I've learned - mostly the hard way - that seeing something nice, doesn't necessarily mean a nice photo...

TooLateForAName

4,932 posts

214 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
I picked up a good tip from the Lee Filters MD at the TP conference.

Two ND grads, one 'upside down' will give you a stripe on the overlap that you can line up on the sun, and the sky and the land can then fall into the less nd'ed bit.

So potentially a .3 covering the landscape/sea, a .6 one the sky and with the overlap .9 on the middle where the sun is.

(He was talking about seascapes and smoothing hence the nd on the foreground)

havoc

33,428 posts

265 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
SamHH said:
Don't make the mistake of seeing a pretty sunset and just photographing the sky; you've got to have something good in the foreground too. Your photo is boring because although the sky is nice, you've just got a big slab of silhouetted land filling the bottom half of the frame; there's nothing interesting there.
yes

You don't need HDR or a grad IF you've something interesting to silhouette against. I've used plants, a gas torch, a ruined abbey/church - anything which has an interesting shape to 'frame' the colours.

And as mentioned above, water is very good - balances a picture beautifully.

Rob13

9,081 posts

254 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all


I was fortunate to have something to silhouette against. To some people its not too nice, to me its home!

fergusd

1,251 posts

300 months

Friday 9th October 2009
quotequote all
Set your white balance to 'bright sunlight' . . . if you want to capture the colours without 'issing about in photoflop . . .

Fd