Canon EF Zoom lens - work on digital camera ?
Canon EF Zoom lens - work on digital camera ?
Author
Discussion

W1TAK

Original Poster:

277 posts

249 months

Saturday 22nd August 2009
quotequote all
Hello, I have an EF 75-300mm III zoom lens bought for a non digital EOS300 about 8yrs ago, it has the manual and auto focus. Question is...will this lens work with a digital SLR ?

Ive never bought a digital SLR and was wondering whether to sell or keep this lens

Many thanks

SamHH

5,078 posts

246 months

Saturday 22nd August 2009
quotequote all
Yes, it will work with Canon digital SLRs, as will any Canon lens with "EF" in the name.

W1TAK

Original Poster:

277 posts

249 months

Saturday 22nd August 2009
quotequote all
Thats great news it gives me two options, 1. buy a Canon digital SLR or 2. Sell the lens, any ideas how much it would be worth second hand in good condition ( eg hardly ever used ) ?

Marc W

3,782 posts

241 months

Saturday 22nd August 2009
quotequote all
I'd go for option 1 as you won't get very much at all for the lens. You can get a similar modern equivalent for £135.

plg101

4,106 posts

240 months

Saturday 22nd August 2009
quotequote all
Option 1; if you want to dabble without breaking the bank then consider a used Canon 10D/20D or 30D for between £199 and £369 from a good dealer...

All great cameras, and ignore the fact that they have less megapixels than new cameras - far more toys to play with (30D is an excellent model...) and 6-8megapixels are fine for up to A3 prints

Kermit power

29,622 posts

243 months

Saturday 22nd August 2009
quotequote all
Or a 350/400/450D if you don't want to lug around a house brick!

plg101

4,106 posts

240 months

Saturday 22nd August 2009
quotequote all
Kermit power said:
Or a 350/400/450D if you don't want to lug around a house brick!
House brick... better built, more to hold, and more functions, eg spot metering...

Try lugging a 40D with a 300 f4 around for a few hours wink

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

284 months

Saturday 22nd August 2009
quotequote all
The newer you gte the better the LCD is , thats about the defining feature.

If you want fast fps (5-65.) and typicaly better controls go for a xxD else the xxxD line is fine, avoid the 300D tho.

Kermit power

29,622 posts

243 months

Sunday 23rd August 2009
quotequote all
plg101 said:
House brick... better built, more to hold, and more functions, eg spot metering...
House brick yes

Better built? I've taken 7,000 shots in all sorts of different situations so far on my 450D without the slightest suggestion that the build quality isn't up to the job. What sort of shooting did you have in mind for which it isn't up to the job?

More to hold? There certainly is that! 50% more volume and 55% more weight if you're comparing the 450D with the 40D. This alone was enough to put the 40D out of the running for me. Have you tried getting the hulking great thing into carry-on luggage?

More functions? Possibly, but spot metering isn't one of them! hehe The only area I can really see where the 40D has a clear edge over the 450D is in fps and buffer size, and it hasn't been much of an issue in the sort of photography I like to date.

darich

24 posts

227 months

Sunday 23rd August 2009
quotequote all
plg101 said:
Kermit power said:
Or a 350/400/450D if you don't want to lug around a house brick!
House brick... better built, more to hold, and more functions, eg spot metering...

Try lugging a 40D with a 300 f4 around for a few hours wink
Even worse (or better), try lugging a Canon 5d with a 24-70 f2.8 around for a few hours!! smile

plg101

4,106 posts

240 months

Sunday 23rd August 2009
quotequote all
Kermit power said:
plg101 said:
House brick... better built, more to hold, and more functions, eg spot metering...
House brick yes

Better built? I've taken 7,000 shots in all sorts of different situations so far on my 450D without the slightest suggestion that the build quality isn't up to the job. What sort of shooting did you have in mind for which it isn't up to the job?

More to hold? There certainly is that! 50% more volume and 55% more weight if you're comparing the 450D with the 40D. This alone was enough to put the 40D out of the running for me. Have you tried getting the hulking great thing into carry-on luggage?

More functions? Possibly, but spot metering isn't one of them! hehe The only area I can really see where the 40D has a clear edge over the 450D is in fps and buffer size, and it hasn't been much of an issue in the sort of photography I like to date.
I'm not saying the 450D isn't a good camera... not turning this into better/worse thread. It is well built. The 20/30/40/50D are better still, and the 1d/5d are even better.

Small isn't always good. If you have big hands, a larger camera is easier to hold. Personally my hands got cramp with a 400/450, but I know that doesn't effect everyone.

Anyway, my point was just that for £x amount, the OP should consider any used camera of a previous model generation to get best value and ignore the race for megapixels... Nothing more.


W1TAK

Original Poster:

277 posts

249 months

Sunday 23rd August 2009
quotequote all
appreciate all the advice, decided not to sell the lens but go option 1 and save up for a second hand Canon digital.

Starfighter

5,348 posts

208 months

Monday 24th August 2009
quotequote all
Stock question - What kit should I get?

Stock answer - What do you want to do with it?

Yes keep the lens as it will work with and Canon DSLR. With regard to which body the what do you want to shoot?

If you have big hands then the xxD bodies do fit better - I could not get a proper hold of a 450D even with a battery pack on it. Get in to a camera shop and have a try of the 450D and 50D bodies and see how they feel. The body size has changed very little back to the older models.

Don't get too hung up over the body andyway - This is the replaceable / disposable part of the setup - Just makesure that you get the best glass you can afford as this is the limiting factor on image quality. Even the entry level cameras will find the distortion in the cheep lenses on offer.

Podie

46,649 posts

305 months

Monday 24th August 2009
quotequote all
darich said:
plg101 said:
Kermit power said:
Or a 350/400/450D if you don't want to lug around a house brick!
House brick... better built, more to hold, and more functions, eg spot metering...

Try lugging a 40D with a 300 f4 around for a few hours wink
Even worse (or better), try lugging a Canon 5d with a 24-70 f2.8 around for a few hours!! smile
All depends what you're used to handling. The vast majority of the stuff I shoot, I do with a 20D, battery grip and 70-200 f2.8 IS and will often spend the day with it in my hand.

Ed_P

701 posts

299 months

Monday 24th August 2009
quotequote all
Podie said:
darich said:
plg101 said:
Kermit power said:
Or a 350/400/450D if you don't want to lug around a house brick!
House brick... better built, more to hold, and more functions, eg spot metering...

Try lugging a 40D with a 300 f4 around for a few hours wink
Even worse (or better), try lugging a Canon 5d with a 24-70 f2.8 around for a few hours!! smile
All depends what you're used to handling. The vast majority of the stuff I shoot, I do with a 20D, battery grip and 70-200 f2.8 IS and will often spend the day with it in my hand.
Yes, it's surprising what you can get accustomed to. My usual combination is a 5D with 70-200 F2.8. It is heavy, but totally worth it! Also, ditch the supplied one and invest in an Op/Tech Pro shoulder strap. Great investment for around £20.00.

Podie

46,649 posts

305 months

Monday 24th August 2009
quotequote all
Ed_P said:
Also, ditch the supplied one and invest in an Op/Tech Pro shoulder strap. Great investment for around £20.00.
yes worth every penny.