What FILM SLR?
Author
Discussion

Kermit power

Original Poster:

29,622 posts

243 months

Friday 26th June 2009
quotequote all
One of the girls next door is starting a photography A-Level in September. I'd said she could borrow some of my lenses and stuff to help keep the cost down if she got herself a Canon body, but she's just had the induction day today, and they've told them they have to use film cameras!

Anyway, unless the school can be persuaded to abandon the physical darkroom in favour of a digital one she's stuck with film, so what would people recommend?

Firstly, are there any Canon film bodies that can use EF lenses?

If not, I'm assuming the best approach would probably be to get onto Ebay, but what to buy? Are there any systems which had good lenses that can't be used on any digital bodies? I'm assuming this would give the best quality for the least cash, which is going to be paramount for something of no use after her course.

Simpo Two

92,870 posts

295 months

Friday 26th June 2009
quotequote all
Nikon has been using the same basic mount since 1959 - is that any help? Nikon F90 bodies (semi-pro, £600 new) are less than £100 now.

I guess the usual 'Nikon or Canon' theory applies, although the classic weapon of the impoversished photography student is the veritable Zenit.

LongQ

13,864 posts

263 months

Friday 26th June 2009
quotequote all
There are about 20 years worth of Canon EOS based 35mm film bodies but bear in mind they will only be compatible with EF and not EF-S lenses.

Go back before that and you get about 20 years worth of non Af film bodies using the FD bayonet mount system. Alternatively any other manufacturer will likely be just as suitable since bodies are cheapo and lenses too. Just be aware that some components will be showing their age and light seals may be a bit marginal in many cases. Some of the oldest stuff is getting to the point where there are few people around to fix it if it goes wrong. But then since it costs little why fix?

Afaik Canon still do a 35mm body but you rarely see one in the stores. The Top of the Range bodies from the EOS 35mm era sell for not too much money - but then I would guess that a photography course is not going to be looking at how to make the most of 1990's electronics. Much more likely they would like something basic with which to learn the basics. I would guess.

I suspect that a non-Canon purchase might give greater flexibility in the lens availability (and later usefulness) stakes. I still from time to time use my old FD lenses with digital bodies, via an adapter.

Kermit power

Original Poster:

29,622 posts

243 months

Friday 26th June 2009
quotequote all
So something like this Canon EOS 1 would work perfectly well with Canon EF lenses?

Kermit power

Original Poster:

29,622 posts

243 months

Friday 26th June 2009
quotequote all
In addition to lenses, would a 580 EXII and/or MR-14EX ring flash also work with the EOS film bodies?

LongQ

13,864 posts

263 months

Friday 26th June 2009
quotequote all
There is a whole load of information here ...

http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/entry.htm

and more if you follow its links.

Not sure you can assume backwards compatibility but the chances are that things will work but obviously not all modern functions are available on the older kit.

However you are talking sophsticated hardware and, as Simpo alluded to, the study courses may not warrant such kit. Indeed they may not want it. The Zenit, a light meter (what that then?) and perhaps an ancient flash gun along with one or two manual lenses may be what the course creators have in mind.

Eggman

1,253 posts

241 months

Friday 26th June 2009
quotequote all
LongQ said:
However you are talking sophsticated hardware and, as Simpo alluded to, the study courses may not warrant such kit. Indeed they may not want it. The Zenit, a light meter (what that then?) and perhaps an ancient flash gun along with one or two manual lenses may be what the course creators have in mind.
Good advice, but I would recommend choosing a Praktica LTL or MTL series camera instead of the Zenit - they're much nicer things to use, still built like a tank and have TTL metering.

M42 screw lenses and accessories have always been a lot cheaper than bayonet fittings (although I daresay the difference in price is pretty marginal now), which will make it a lot easier to experiment with things like bellows and extension tubes. Pentax screw fit lenses are good quality and cheap.

Something like this kit on Ebay looks like a cheap way of getting lots of bits and pieces in one hit - just need to add a 28mm lens to that and she's in business.

LongQ

13,864 posts

263 months

Friday 26th June 2009
quotequote all
Eggman said:
LongQ said:
However you are talking sophsticated hardware and, as Simpo alluded to, the study courses may not warrant such kit. Indeed they may not want it. The Zenit, a light meter (what that then?) and perhaps an ancient flash gun along with one or two manual lenses may be what the course creators have in mind.
Good advice, but I would recommend choosing a Praktica LTL or MTL series camera instead of the Zenit - they're much nicer things to use, still built like a tank and have TTL metering.

M42 screw lenses and accessories have always been a lot cheaper than bayonet fittings (although I daresay the difference in price is pretty marginal now), which will make it a lot easier to experiment with things like bellows and extension tubes. Pentax screw fit lenses are good quality and cheap.

Something like this kit on Ebay looks like a cheap way of getting lots of bits and pieces in one hit - just need to add a 28mm lens to that and she's in business.
Agreed about the Praktica though to be honest I reckon you could get Pentax for about the same price and that would be even better, as you observe with reference to their lenses. There is some very good, very cheap glass out there and you can pick up a Pro grade flash that may not be good for a 'modern' camera (due to voltages) for a few quid.

Then all you need is a little device to allow you to use a cheapo digital point and shoot as a Polaroid substitute and you're away!

SamHH

5,078 posts

246 months

Friday 26th June 2009
quotequote all
Kermit power said:
So something like this Canon EOS 1 would work perfectly well with Canon EF lenses?
Yes, anything with EOS in the name is an EF mount camera. They came out in the mid 80s, a long time before digital cameras become popular.

Kermit power said:
In addition to lenses, would a 580 EXII and/or MR-14EX ring flash also work with the EOS film bodies?
Yes.

Edited by SamHH on Friday 26th June 21:42

Eggman

1,253 posts

241 months

Friday 26th June 2009
quotequote all
LongQ said:
I reckon you could get Pentax for about the same price and that would be even better
Bah - now you've got me looking at Spotmatics on Ebay. I'd best get myself to the pub whilst I can still resist them!

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

284 months

Friday 26th June 2009
quotequote all
Hm I have an EOS 10 and a 1000F, I asume the 10 is the better of the two, havnt used either tho.

Famous Graham

26,553 posts

255 months

Saturday 27th June 2009
quotequote all
Not an EF, but I love my A1 - tis an FD mount, but it's a great wee camera. 25 quid or so for the body. Managed to snag that, a 50 1.4 and 80 1.2 for 175 quid a couple of years ago.

Must get some film for it, actually...

LongQ

13,864 posts

263 months

Saturday 27th June 2009
quotequote all
Famous Graham said:
Not an EF, but I love my A1 - tis an FD mount, but it's a great wee camera. 25 quid or so for the body. Managed to snag that, a 50 1.4 and 80 1.2 for 175 quid a couple of years ago.

Must get some film for it, actually...
Hmm, 80 1.2. Hmm.

My A1 has the cough, but still seems to work well though I have not used it for some time. Have an AE1 too. And a 'New F1' which is just great to hold and use. It has real presence in the hand.

Must get around to using some of my film stock - but digital is just so much more instantly available ...

fixedwheelnut

744 posts

262 months

Sunday 28th June 2009
quotequote all
I still use a Canon AE-1 35mm SLR that I have and have seen some in Camera shops going for around £80 so have a look around.

Most people are upgrading or using digital so there are plenty of film cameras about at good prices.

LongQ

13,864 posts

263 months

Sunday 28th June 2009
quotequote all
fixedwheelnut said:
I still use a Canon AE-1 35mm SLR that I have and have seen some in Camera shops going for around £80 so have a look around.

Most people are upgrading or using digital so there are plenty of film cameras about at good prices.
I've seen AE-1s complete with multiple lenses and otehr useful bits of kit go for less than that on eBay.

Sad really.


Stickers

1,387 posts

229 months

Sunday 28th June 2009
quotequote all
Be carefull when using reverse tech on EF lenses as the sensor on digital bodies is mounted much deeper inside the body & the film plane on 35mm a lot closer to the lense.

I'm sure that digital EF lenses also protrude deeper into the body (to compensate) than their 35mm counterparts, hence the 1.6x rule that applies when fitting non digital EF to Digital bodies (200mm x 1.6 = 320mm)

I'm sure there's a problem here, I doubt the lense manufactured specifically for digital will foul the mirror, more than likely the image will not fill the entire film plane.

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

284 months

Sunday 28th June 2009
quotequote all
Stickers said:
Be carefull when using reverse tech on EF lenses as the sensor on digital bodies is mounted much deeper inside the body & the film plane on 35mm a lot closer to the lense.

I'm sure that digital EF lenses also protrude deeper into the body (to compensate) than their 35mm counterparts, hence the 1.6x rule that applies when fitting non digital EF to Digital bodies (200mm x 1.6 = 320mm)

I'm sure there's a problem here, I doubt the lense manufactured specifically for digital will foul the mirror, more than likely the image will not fill the entire film plane.
Uh what? The sensor/film is in exactly the same plane all the time.

The difference/trouble is with canons EF-S lens's back protuding further into the body thus fouling the mirror ( and also produce a smalle rimage circle).

Note only Canon lens's do this, my 'crop' sigma 10-20 works fine on a full frame 5D.

Stickers

1,387 posts

229 months

Sunday 28th June 2009
quotequote all
LongQ said:
I would guess that a photography course is not going to be looking at how to make the most of 1990's electronics. Much more likely they would like something basic with which to learn the basics. I would guess.
You're probably spot on there, although I learned on a MF Roliflex twin lense reflex & light meter......it certainly taught me everything I needed to know about shutter speed/aperture values along with associated DOF.

Stickers

1,387 posts

229 months

Sunday 28th June 2009
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
Uh what? The sensor/film is in exactly the same plane all the time.

The difference/trouble is with canons EF-S lens's back protuding further into the body thus fouling the mirror ( and also produce a smalle rimage circle).

Note only Canon lens's do this, my 'crop' sigma 10-20 works fine on a full frame 5D.
Where did I suggest that the sensor/film plane moved?.....I merely stated that they were different depths inside their respective bodies, if this is incorrect I oppologise......other than that you have repeated my post word for word.

The deeper digital lenses could be due to smaller (than film) sensors.

tog

4,957 posts

258 months

Monday 29th June 2009
quotequote all
Stickers said:
I merely stated that they were different depths inside their respective bodies, if this is incorrect I apologise
Both film and digital bodies are all the same depth from lens flange to film plane. (If they weren't it would make focusing more complicated.) However you are right that some EF-S lenses protrude into the body. They can do this due to the smaller mirror used on some DSLRs, which is a side effect of the smaller APS-C sized image sensor. As a consequence, EF lenses will fit all EOS bodies, EF-S will only fit some digital bodies and no film bodies. smile