cop tasers great granny
Author
Discussion

craste

Original Poster:

1,225 posts

223 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
this copper needs shooting - what a feeble excuse for a man!!


http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,2...

Dakkon

7,826 posts

269 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
Yeah, should have shown her the back of his hand.

matchmaker

8,796 posts

216 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
craste said:
this copper needs shooting - what a feeble excuse for a man!!


http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,2...
No - granny was asking (literally) for it!

Mc lovin

5,588 posts

237 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
Only in the US hehe

JJCW

2,449 posts

202 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
Well what did she expect to happen? He gave her ample warning!!

JamesM

3,114 posts

205 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
She was fking asking for that one. A little harsh maybe. A pimp slap would have sufficed, just so the police officer could assert his dominance.......

Deva Link

26,934 posts

261 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
craste said:
this copper needs shooting - what a feeble excuse for a man!!
Did you actually read the article?

Flanders.

6,419 posts

224 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
Also, what does it matter if shes a great granny or what?

micky g

1,565 posts

251 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
You lot are fking Nazis, she was 72 FFS! If a police officer cannot control a woman of that age without resorting to pumping her with 5000 volts he shouldn't be doing the job. Sure she was mouthy and resistant, that occasionally is going to happen when you are an officer. It's not desirable but what an over-reaction.

It was for speeding, a victimless crime.

He wants sacking.

nonegreen

7,803 posts

286 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
micky g said:
You lot are fking Nazis, she was 72 FFS! If a police officer cannot control a woman of that age without resorting to pumping her with 5000 volts he shouldn't be doing the job. Sure she was mouthy and resistant, that occasionally is going to happen when you are an officer. It's not desirable but what an over-reaction.

It was for speeding, a victimless crime.

He wants sacking.
Nah we shouldn't sack him we should make him watch while we take the contents of his 401k and wipe our arses on it before flushing it away. Then Half a dozen 6ft grandchildren should be let loose on the scum with bullwhips. If he survives that, hang the vermin old west style from a tree.... real slow.

fluffnik

20,156 posts

243 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
Speed limits are evil.

tinman0

18,231 posts

256 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
micky g said:
You lot are fking Nazis, she was 72 FFS! If a police officer cannot control a woman of that age without resorting to pumping her with 5000 volts he shouldn't be doing the job. Sure she was mouthy and resistant, that occasionally is going to happen when you are an officer. It's not desirable but what an over-reaction.

It was for speeding, a victimless crime.

He wants sacking.
Have you watched the video? She totally over reacted, she wouldn't calm down, was given plenty of opportunity of taking the 60 in a 45 ticket, and she continued to cuss him.

She over played the "I'm 72" as if it gives her some right to behave like a 5 year old, and if it gives her some right to speed. It doesn't. She was given plenty of warnings. Zap. Down you go bh.

Hopefully, the judge will open the case lawsuit against the cops with the definition of a "Frivolous Lawsuit".

glazbagun

14,881 posts

213 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
micky g said:
You lot are fking Nazis, she was 72 FFS! If a police officer cannot control a woman of that age without resorting to pumping her with 5000 volts he shouldn't be doing the job. Sure she was mouthy and resistant, that occasionally is going to happen when you are an officer. It's not desirable but what an over-reaction.

It was for speeding, a victimless crime.

He wants sacking.
So fking what? Being 72 doesnt make it magically OK to be a . She was pulled by a cop for speeding (as in- by a real human, not by a robot) and totally blew up at him. Looks like he gave her fair warning and played it by the book, while she was playing the Old Woman card just as some would play race/social position. She can mouth off all she likes, but I'll bet she treats officers with a bit more respect in future. Old people automatically get a level of reverence that completely undeserved in many cases. If Jade Goody was 72 I still wouldnt think any better of her.

Edited by glazbagun on Thursday 11th June 18:53

DSM2

3,624 posts

216 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
Mc lovin said:
Only in the US hehe
Don't you believe it..................

Gun

13,432 posts

234 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
That's shocking.

micky g

1,565 posts

251 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
tinman0 said:
micky g said:
You lot are fking Nazis, she was 72 FFS! If a police officer cannot control a woman of that age without resorting to pumping her with 5000 volts he shouldn't be doing the job. Sure she was mouthy and resistant, that occasionally is going to happen when you are an officer. It's not desirable but what an over-reaction.

It was for speeding, a victimless crime.

He wants sacking.
Have you watched the video? She totally over reacted, she wouldn't calm down, was given plenty of opportunity of taking the 60 in a 45 ticket, and she continued to cuss him.

She over played the "I'm 72" as if it gives her some right to behave like a 5 year old, and if it gives her some right to speed. It doesn't. She was given plenty of warnings. Zap. Down you go bh.

Hopefully, the judge will open the case lawsuit against the cops with the definition of a "Frivolous Lawsuit".
Of course I watched the video.

She may well have overreacted, the public are like that. It is the officers duty to 'protect and serve' the public. Not fking electrocute them! Was she likely to be a threat to him or another member of the public at the time he zapped her? No, he should have just let her calm down and give her the ticket.

If you condone this behaviour from the bib I can only hope that you are never in such a position that you can wield any form of power beyond that of a keyboard.

tinman0

18,231 posts

256 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
micky g said:
Of course I watched the video.

She may well have overreacted, the public are like that. It is the officers duty to 'protect and serve' the public. Not fking electrocute them! Was she likely to be a threat to him or another member of the public at the time he zapped her? No, he should have just let her calm down and give her the ticket.

If you condone this behaviour from the bib I can only hope that you are never in such a position that you can wield any form of power beyond that of a keyboard.
I meet cops enough times to know; don't fk with cops, or they'll fk with you. She's 72 and should have known better.

She obviously wanted to be on Most Shocking.

micky g

1,565 posts

251 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
tinman0 said:
micky g said:
Of course I watched the video.

She may well have overreacted, the public are like that. It is the officers duty to 'protect and serve' the public. Not fking electrocute them! Was she likely to be a threat to him or another member of the public at the time he zapped her? No, he should have just let her calm down and give her the ticket.

If you condone this behaviour from the bib I can only hope that you are never in such a position that you can wield any form of power beyond that of a keyboard.
I meet cops enough times to know; don't fk with cops, or they'll fk with you.
My point exactly...

Most Shocking smile

Edited by micky g on Thursday 11th June 19:54

Jasandjules

71,129 posts

245 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
Hmm, I'd have thought at 70+ the likelihood of her having a heart attack when zapped would be a lot higher?

So I wonder if perhaps a lesser restraint ought to have been utilised in the first instance.

RichBurley

2,432 posts

269 months

Thursday 11th June 2009
quotequote all
tinman0 said:
micky g said:
Of course I watched the video.

She may well have overreacted, the public are like that. It is the officers duty to 'protect and serve' the public. Not fking electrocute them! Was she likely to be a threat to him or another member of the public at the time he zapped her? No, he should have just let her calm down and give her the ticket.

If you condone this behaviour from the bib I can only hope that you are never in such a position that you can wield any form of power beyond that of a keyboard.
I meet cops enough times to know; don't fk with cops, or they'll fk with you. She's 72 and should have known better.

She obviously wanted to be on Most Shocking.
Pun of the Day!