cop tasers great granny
Discussion
this copper needs shooting - what a feeble excuse for a man!!
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,2...
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,2...
craste said:
this copper needs shooting - what a feeble excuse for a man!!
http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,2...
No - granny was asking (literally) for it!http://www.news.com.au/couriermail/story/0,23739,2...
You lot are f
king Nazis, she was 72 FFS! If a police officer cannot control a woman of that age without resorting to pumping her with 5000 volts he shouldn't be doing the job. Sure she was mouthy and resistant, that occasionally is going to happen when you are an officer. It's not desirable but what an over-reaction.
It was for speeding, a victimless crime.
He wants sacking.

It was for speeding, a victimless crime.
He wants sacking.
micky g said:
You lot are f
king Nazis, she was 72 FFS! If a police officer cannot control a woman of that age without resorting to pumping her with 5000 volts he shouldn't be doing the job. Sure she was mouthy and resistant, that occasionally is going to happen when you are an officer. It's not desirable but what an over-reaction.
It was for speeding, a victimless crime.
He wants sacking.
Nah we shouldn't sack him we should make him watch while we take the contents of his 401k and wipe our arses on it before flushing it away. Then Half a dozen 6ft grandchildren should be let loose on the scum with bullwhips. If he survives that, hang the vermin old west style from a tree.... real slow.
It was for speeding, a victimless crime.
He wants sacking.
micky g said:
You lot are f
king Nazis, she was 72 FFS! If a police officer cannot control a woman of that age without resorting to pumping her with 5000 volts he shouldn't be doing the job. Sure she was mouthy and resistant, that occasionally is going to happen when you are an officer. It's not desirable but what an over-reaction.
It was for speeding, a victimless crime.
He wants sacking.
Have you watched the video? She totally over reacted, she wouldn't calm down, was given plenty of opportunity of taking the 60 in a 45 ticket, and she continued to cuss him.
It was for speeding, a victimless crime.
He wants sacking.
She over played the "I'm 72" as if it gives her some right to behave like a 5 year old, and if it gives her some right to speed. It doesn't. She was given plenty of warnings. Zap. Down you go b

Hopefully, the judge will open the case lawsuit against the cops with the definition of a "Frivolous Lawsuit".
micky g said:
You lot are f
king Nazis, she was 72 FFS! If a police officer cannot control a woman of that age without resorting to pumping her with 5000 volts he shouldn't be doing the job. Sure she was mouthy and resistant, that occasionally is going to happen when you are an officer. It's not desirable but what an over-reaction.
It was for speeding, a victimless crime.
He wants sacking.
So f
It was for speeding, a victimless crime.
He wants sacking.


Edited by glazbagun on Thursday 11th June 18:53
tinman0 said:
micky g said:
You lot are f
king Nazis, she was 72 FFS! If a police officer cannot control a woman of that age without resorting to pumping her with 5000 volts he shouldn't be doing the job. Sure she was mouthy and resistant, that occasionally is going to happen when you are an officer. It's not desirable but what an over-reaction.
It was for speeding, a victimless crime.
He wants sacking.
Have you watched the video? She totally over reacted, she wouldn't calm down, was given plenty of opportunity of taking the 60 in a 45 ticket, and she continued to cuss him.
It was for speeding, a victimless crime.
He wants sacking.
She over played the "I'm 72" as if it gives her some right to behave like a 5 year old, and if it gives her some right to speed. It doesn't. She was given plenty of warnings. Zap. Down you go b

Hopefully, the judge will open the case lawsuit against the cops with the definition of a "Frivolous Lawsuit".
She may well have overreacted, the public are like that. It is the officers duty to 'protect and serve' the public. Not f

If you condone this behaviour from the bib I can only hope that you are never in such a position that you can wield any form of power beyond that of a keyboard.
micky g said:
Of course I watched the video.
She may well have overreacted, the public are like that. It is the officers duty to 'protect and serve' the public. Not f
king electrocute them! Was she likely to be a threat to him or another member of the public at the time he zapped her? No, he should have just let her calm down and give her the ticket.
If you condone this behaviour from the bib I can only hope that you are never in such a position that you can wield any form of power beyond that of a keyboard.
I meet cops enough times to know; don't fShe may well have overreacted, the public are like that. It is the officers duty to 'protect and serve' the public. Not f

If you condone this behaviour from the bib I can only hope that you are never in such a position that you can wield any form of power beyond that of a keyboard.


She obviously wanted to be on Most Shocking.
tinman0 said:
micky g said:
Of course I watched the video.
She may well have overreacted, the public are like that. It is the officers duty to 'protect and serve' the public. Not f
king electrocute them! Was she likely to be a threat to him or another member of the public at the time he zapped her? No, he should have just let her calm down and give her the ticket.
If you condone this behaviour from the bib I can only hope that you are never in such a position that you can wield any form of power beyond that of a keyboard.
I meet cops enough times to know; don't fShe may well have overreacted, the public are like that. It is the officers duty to 'protect and serve' the public. Not f

If you condone this behaviour from the bib I can only hope that you are never in such a position that you can wield any form of power beyond that of a keyboard.


Most Shocking

Edited by micky g on Thursday 11th June 19:54
tinman0 said:
micky g said:
Of course I watched the video.
She may well have overreacted, the public are like that. It is the officers duty to 'protect and serve' the public. Not f
king electrocute them! Was she likely to be a threat to him or another member of the public at the time he zapped her? No, he should have just let her calm down and give her the ticket.
If you condone this behaviour from the bib I can only hope that you are never in such a position that you can wield any form of power beyond that of a keyboard.
I meet cops enough times to know; don't fShe may well have overreacted, the public are like that. It is the officers duty to 'protect and serve' the public. Not f

If you condone this behaviour from the bib I can only hope that you are never in such a position that you can wield any form of power beyond that of a keyboard.


She obviously wanted to be on Most Shocking.
Gassing Station | News, Politics & Economics | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff