What can't you take pictures of?
What can't you take pictures of?
Author
Discussion

Funk Odyssey

Original Poster:

1,983 posts

259 months

Saturday 6th June 2009
quotequote all
As some of you know - I take lots of pictures of motor vehicles -ok - mostly lorries....

I also take lots of portraits.


Most of the time - I can produce pictures that I like......


However -- I just cannot take landscape pictures........... I don't know whether it's composition, too much post processing (or too little).... no idea where to start..


So -- what's your photographic Achille's Heel?

kit80

4,764 posts

217 months

Saturday 6th June 2009
quotequote all
People is something I just haven't done well in at all! They move and stuff.

Famous Graham

26,553 posts

255 months

Saturday 6th June 2009
quotequote all
Static cars. Just never developed the eye for the right angle.

cottonfoo

6,050 posts

240 months

Saturday 6th June 2009
quotequote all
Funk Odyssey said:
However -- I just cannot take landscape pictures........... I don't know whether it's composition, too much post processing (or too little).... no idea where to start..
Strange isn't it. I find I can do landscapes quite OK, IMO at least. Composition matters more with landscapes rather than post-processing. I think I have certain astros down now too, getting a good star focus is the main problem there.

I haven't tried portraiture, doesn't really interest me that much yet. I think I struggle with motorsport, not having done anything serious with it, and going on one past attempt. I prefer to take landscape and astro photos, I think people struggle with whatever their preference isn't.

Edited by cottonfoo on Saturday 6th June 21:39

Funk Odyssey

Original Poster:

1,983 posts

259 months

Saturday 6th June 2009
quotequote all
cottonfoo said:
Funk Odyssey said:
However -- I just cannot take landscape pictures........... I don't know whether it's composition, too much post processing (or too little).... no idea where to start..
Strange isn't it. I find I can do landscapes quite OK, IMO at least. Composition matters more with landscapes rather than post-processing. I think I have certain astros down now too, getting a good star focus is the main problem there.

I haven't tried portraiture, doesn't really interest me that much yet. I think I struggle with motorsport, not having done anything serious with it, and going on one past attempt. I prefer to take landscape and astro photos, I think people struggle with whatever their preference isn't.

Edited by cottonfoo on Saturday 6th June 21:39
Portraits and people are a bit of an interest of mine -- I don't post them here but I've been having a bit of a bokeh obsession - looks great to me and the subjects are pleased....

I suppose I've just had lots of practice with vehicles -- I do prefer rusty/abandoned stuff -- I can't abide the over 'shopped cheese wedge sports cars that look like screenshots from Tron.......

For me -- vehicle pictures are all about how low you are and what angle you tak the picture at.

Landscapes -- it's not so much composition --- I'm just never entirely happy with the exposure or the sky - esp the sky actually ------

cottonfoo

6,050 posts

240 months

Saturday 6th June 2009
quotequote all
Funk Odyssey said:
Landscapes -- it's not so much composition --- I'm just never entirely happy with the exposure or the sky - esp the sky actually ------
In what way? Do you think a polariser might help? Skies can sometimes be a bit washed out, I don't even bother if it's overcast.

DIW35

4,205 posts

230 months

Saturday 6th June 2009
quotequote all
People - specifically portraits. Just can't seem to find that easy banter that good portrait photographers seem to have to put their models at ease and get the best out of them. Haven't managed to master the lighting either, which doesn't help.

Funk Odyssey

Original Poster:

1,983 posts

259 months

Saturday 6th June 2009
quotequote all
cottonfoo said:
Funk Odyssey said:
Landscapes -- it's not so much composition --- I'm just never entirely happy with the exposure or the sky - esp the sky actually ------
In what way? Do you think a polariser might help? Skies can sometimes be a bit washed out, I don't even bother if it's overcast.
I've never used a filter .... perhaps it's time to try!

Yes --- the skies can be a little washed out. -- which is a shame as I like contrasty pictures

I suspect the old maxim of only taking pictures first thing or last thing may well help too!

any filter recommendations? -

cottonfoo

6,050 posts

240 months

Saturday 6th June 2009
quotequote all
Funk Odyssey said:
any filter recommendations? -
Not from me smile Not got one yet. I do most of my landscapes in NZ which seems quite forgiving. I'm planning on going for a Hoya circular, but with a new camera on the medium-term horizon I may wait.

Funk Odyssey

Original Poster:

1,983 posts

259 months

Saturday 6th June 2009
quotequote all
cottonfoo said:
Funk Odyssey said:
any filter recommendations? -
Not from me smile Not got one yet. I do most of my landscapes in NZ which seems quite forgiving. I'm planning on going for a Hoya circular, but with a new camera on the medium-term horizon I may wait.
I've looked at Hoya-- but there seems to be several different levels of filter available -- in different colour boxes?

cottonfoo

6,050 posts

240 months

Saturday 6th June 2009
quotequote all
Funk Odyssey said:
I've looked at Hoya-- but there seems to be several different levels of filter available -- in different colour boxes?
Have a look here, http://www.hoya-online.co.uk/lst109.htm.

A polariser (or polarizer) shouldn't be colourised. Also have a read of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photographic_filter#P....


Edited by cottonfoo on Saturday 6th June 22:24

Funk Odyssey

Original Poster:

1,983 posts

259 months

Saturday 6th June 2009
quotequote all
cottonfoo said:
Funk Odyssey said:
I've looked at Hoya-- but there seems to be several different levels of filter available -- in different colour boxes?
Have a look here, http://www.hoya-online.co.uk/lst109.htm.

A polariser (or polarizer) shouldn't be colourised. Also have a read of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photographic_filter#P....


Edited by cottonfoo on Saturday 6th June 22:24
no- the boxes are different colours -- I know what a polarizing filter does !

cottonfoo

6,050 posts

240 months

Saturday 6th June 2009
quotequote all
Funk Odyssey said:
[
no- the boxes are different colours -- I know what a polarizing filter does !
Sorry smile Got an example of what you're referring to?

havoc

33,437 posts

265 months

Sunday 7th June 2009
quotequote all
I struggle with people as well, particularly the 'reportage' style that I see a few people on here do so well...which is a shame as it's the one dimension missing from all of our holiday photos...

With me it's not having the right 'eye' for what would be a good photo in that style. Is there any way to 'learn' that?!?

Simpo Two

92,874 posts

295 months

Sunday 7th June 2009
quotequote all
havoc said:
I struggle with people as well, particularly the 'reportage' style that I see a few people on here do so well...which is a shame as it's the one dimension missing from all of our holiday photos... With me it's not having the right 'eye' for what would be a good photo in that style. Is there any way to 'learn' that?!?
I'd say anticipation, empathy and reflexes - so you have the right settings and catch the fleeting expression. Oh, and composition too of course. And lighting.

My weakness is landscapes - it may be because I don't get up early enough!