settle an argument for me!
Author
Discussion

Lefty Guns

Original Poster:

20,714 posts

229 months

Sunday 17th May 2009
quotequote all
I'm cooking a thai red curry and:

I think it will thicken quicker with the lid on

And

The missus thinks it will thicken quicker with the lid off.


What sayeth ph?

Zen.

794 posts

222 months

Sunday 17th May 2009
quotequote all
With the lid off the liquid will evaporate, with the lid on the liquid will drop back down into the pan.

AlpineWhite

2,164 posts

222 months

Sunday 17th May 2009
quotequote all
I sayeth with the lid off - water (steam) can escape, whereas with a lid it will be recirculated into the pan, no?

SS2.

14,702 posts

265 months

Sunday 17th May 2009
quotequote all
A Thai red curry shouldn't need thickening.. wink

Other than that, I side with the good lady.

Puggit

49,667 posts

275 months

Sunday 17th May 2009
quotequote all
Poor Lefty, I don't think he'll be getting much support hehe

OllieWinchester

5,700 posts

219 months

Sunday 17th May 2009
quotequote all
Obviously with the lid off as the steam can then evaporate, the residual heat might be higher with the lid on though. Some sort of compromise maybe?

Wadeski

8,980 posts

240 months

Sunday 17th May 2009
quotequote all
stick to the whisky, lefty - lid off = more evaporation = more reduction wink

Lefty Guns

Original Poster:

20,714 posts

229 months

Sunday 17th May 2009
quotequote all
Oh well...

t'was good anyway. And I'm now on the whisky - Balvenie 17 (Sherry Oak) and it's ace

Ian Davidson

4,506 posts

223 months

Sunday 17th May 2009
quotequote all
Lefty Guns said:
Oh well...

t'was good anyway. And I'm now on the whisky - Balvenie 17 (Sherry Oak) and it's ace
Make sure you leave the lid off.

Lefty Guns

Original Poster:

20,714 posts

229 months

Sunday 17th May 2009
quotequote all
Off the Balvenie?

laugh

Wadeski

8,980 posts

240 months

Sunday 17th May 2009
quotequote all
yes, you'll get more reduction by evaporation biglaugh