RE: SOTW: Mitsubishi Galant GTI 16v

RE: SOTW: Mitsubishi Galant GTI 16v

Friday 15th May 2009

SOTW: Mitsubishi Galant GTI 16v

Shed buys in to Mitsubishi's rallying roots



In the late Eighties the Japanese developed a small fixation with four-wheel-steer, the Mazda MX-6 and Honda Prelude both had it, and so too did Mitsubishi’s sixth generation Galant. The understated family saloon had a proud history of being a reliable, but slightly boring, Japanese runabout, so as it neared its 20th birthday Mitsubishi decided to inject a bit of spice into the Galant.

Despite having proved a very popular car, and even scooping the prestigious title of ‘Japanese Car of the Year’ in 1987, it was the hot VR4 version that really caught people’s attention as it heralded Mitsubishi’s entry into Group A rallying. Based


on the 205bhp Galant VR4, the Group A rally car was followed by a Group N version.

Slowly but surely the Galant VR4 developed into a more impressive package. The Japanese manufacturer had no problem producing the 5000 production cars needed for rally homologation, and after a few outings the VR4 found its feet and before long Mitsubishi began to dominate the Group N rally category. The Galant had secured Mitsubishi a place at the top table of rallying.

Sadly Shed’s budget doesn’t stretch to a decent example of the VR4, however, the less powerful, naturally aspirated GTI 16v version is well within budget.


The sixth generation Galant saw the introduction of four-wheel-steer to accompany the four-wheel-drive system and all round ABS. The GTI 16v proved very popular and German tuners AMG even went to work on a few examples to increase the car’s power output to 170bhp and add a new, more aggressive bodykit to bulk up the standard car’s extremely understated looks.

This particular Galant GTI 16v appears to be in fine shape, with a relatively low number of miles on the clock considering its 20-year age. The 2.0-litre engine is known for its strength, and the current owner’s one-time project of bumping the power up to the 300bhp mark is within the engine’s tolerance levels.


Ebay Ad reads:

1989 Mitsubishi Galant GTI 16V £800

Up for grabs is a an Automotive bargain and quite a rare car! These Mitsubishi Galant GTi's are very understated, Having both 4 wheel drive and 4 wheel steering they have unbelievable road holding and traction combined with Japanese reliability.

I brought this car 2 years ago as a project vehicle. Mechanically they are the same as the Turbo VR4 version which is a Evo by any other name, the intension was to turbo charge this one and have a 300bhp Subaru killer!! Sadly  I do not have the time and honestly the car is in such good condition I felt it was better to let someone else have the chance to enjoy one of these cars. During all the snow we had in February this car out performed many large 4 wheel drives in the snow! ploughing through 1 foot of virgin snow, up and down roads with many abandoned cars!


This vehicle has only covered 74545 miles from new, it has had a new cam belt,oil and filter,new battery, new alternator, new wiper blades and a MOT just 1 month ago. It starts every time with just 1 turn of the key, all of the electrics work and will return 35mpg when required. It has the factory upgrade alloy wheels and wooden dash trim, all very 80's chic! I can tax the vehicle for anyone to just drive away but you will be charged the standard rate on top of the auction price.

The bad bits: It has a scratch on the front bumper (pictured) already on the car when I purchased it. A small blemish on 1 wheel arch and some chav number plates!

I would like a deposit by Paypal and cash on collection. Collection with in 5 days.

Please feel free to call and I will be happy to discuss any of the finer points of this classic Japanese sports sedan! £800 buy it now.



   

 

Author
Discussion

jeoff82

Original Poster:

106 posts

197 months

Friday 15th May 2009
quotequote all
I bet thats quite good fun to drive.

Fetchez la vache

5,646 posts

221 months

Friday 15th May 2009
quotequote all
Unless the aim is for some kind of sleeper that you'd upgrade to high heaven and remove any go faster badges whatsoever, then I can't see the attraction of this one.

Edit: Mind you I missed the bit about 4wd & 4ws... must have nodded off smile Sleeper it is then.

Edited by Fetchez la vache on Friday 15th May 10:50

morgrp

4,128 posts

205 months

Friday 15th May 2009
quotequote all
Not a bad car to be honest - love the guy's honesty about the "chav plates"!

SVX

2,188 posts

218 months

Friday 15th May 2009
quotequote all
Oooh, I like, something about that has real sleeper potential... Drop a turbocharged lump in there, and as mentioned above de-badge. biggrin

Matt_N

8,918 posts

209 months

Friday 15th May 2009
quotequote all
Perfect for an Evo 1/2/3 lump as they use the same mounts and the 4wd gubbins is already in there.

Mind you for the cost of the car plus an Evo engine, your not far off early Evo prices, does have the sleeper element though.

Edited by Matt_N on Friday 15th May 11:10


Edited by Matt_N on Friday 15th May 11:12

forzaminardi

2,295 posts

194 months

Friday 15th May 2009
quotequote all
I always thought these were nice looking cars back in the day. Amazing how fragile and basic it looks now, with the tall glasshouse and plasticky interior. Good little motor though, not a bad performer and it will run forever.

GravelBen

15,913 posts

237 months

Friday 15th May 2009
quotequote all
scratchchin

Must be a different GTi 16v to the JDM version then which was only 2wd, though may have still had the 4ws. A quite revvy 2.0 rather than the 1.8, they do go quite well for what they are. I have my doubts about the 'same mechanicals as VR4' claim though, the NA motor would have much higher compression for a start.

Edited by GravelBen on Friday 15th May 11:15

Turbobanana

6,740 posts

208 months

Friday 15th May 2009
quotequote all
"Mazda MX-6 and Honda Prelude both had it"

Mazda MX-6 with 4WS? Don't remember that, but the 626 did.

IanMorewood

4,309 posts

255 months

Friday 15th May 2009
quotequote all
I went looking for one a few years ago, they where rare beasties back then so more rare now. The driving experience was good for a big car but took some getting used too as the active rear steer was quite novel. Ended up giving a guy a cheque as a deposit pending an AA inspection, AA man said the car had had a heavy frontal drivers side impact at some point so I cancelled the cheque and walked away.


sniff diesel

13,112 posts

219 months

Friday 15th May 2009
quotequote all
Got a link to the original advert?

Ian_T

258 posts

218 months

Friday 15th May 2009
quotequote all
IanMorewood said:
The driving experience was good for a big car but took some getting used too as the active rear steer was quite novel.
Hmm... my feeling, frankly, is that if you could feel it, then it wasn't working properly. I own a GTO, and that feels no different to any other car I have owned (other than going around corners a damn site faster). Same is said by the other owners I know (a fair few!). The only ones who have mentioned this have turned out to have dodgy rear racks.

toggs

179 posts

193 months

Friday 15th May 2009
quotequote all
I had a galant turbo in the previous model went like stink for what it was bit boxy looking but well equiped as are most jap cars.
I debadged mine the only tell tell signs were the inscriptions in the seats

BlueSei

34 posts

194 months

Friday 15th May 2009
quotequote all
Dull, I'd rather walk

sniff diesel

13,112 posts

219 months

Friday 15th May 2009
quotequote all
BlueSei said:
Dull, I'd rather walk
Says the man with no car listed in his profile.

rsstman

1,918 posts

194 months

Friday 15th May 2009
quotequote all
apparently the guys aim was to turn it into a "300bhp subaru killer".
how exactly would it kill subaru`s which are of similar power?

would anyone honestly spend a grand on that piece of rubbish?

Edited by rsstman on Friday 15th May 12:30

toggs

179 posts

193 months

Friday 15th May 2009
quotequote all
BlueSei said:
Dull, I'd rather walk
second class ride is better than first class walk

hayesey

92 posts

248 months

Friday 15th May 2009
quotequote all
article said:
with a relatively low number of miles on the clock considering its 20-year age
advert said:
This vehicle has only covered 74545 miles from new
I would describe that as VERY low mileage for a 20 year old car, not relatively low! It's only about 3700 miles per year!



Edited by hayesey on Friday 15th May 12:33

George B

28 posts

189 months

Friday 15th May 2009
quotequote all
hayesey said:
I would describe that as VERY low mileage for a 20 year old car, not relatively low! It's only about 3700 miles per year!
I'm glad you think that. Our Toyota MR2 Shed Special has only done 77k in its 19 year life so i'd better slap another couple of quid on the asking price idea

nottyash

4,671 posts

202 months

Friday 15th May 2009
quotequote all
Turbobanana said:
"Mazda MX-6 and Honda Prelude both had it"

Mazda MX-6 with 4WS? Don't remember that, but the 626 did.
Yeh I think thats wrong too.

SleeperCell

5,591 posts

249 months

Friday 15th May 2009
quotequote all
Turbobanana said:
"Mazda MX-6 and Honda Prelude both had it"

Mazda MX-6 with 4WS? Don't remember that, but the 626 did.
MX-6 did, it was basically a 2 door 626 anyway.