M25 Lap - difference in distance clockwise vs anticlockwise.

M25 Lap - difference in distance clockwise vs anticlockwise.

Author
Discussion

mrmr96

Original Poster:

13,736 posts

211 months

Thursday 14th May 2009
quotequote all
Here's one for you:

I had a couple of places to visit yesterday and ended up driving around the M25 and did a whole clockwise lap in the end. Towards the final stint I realised that if I had gone anti clockwise then my lap would have been shorter!

So then I started wondering: How much shorter is an anticlockwise lap versus a clockwise lap?

I have managed to get the answer and no doubt a lot of you will too.

So, anyone care to venture a guess?

Flanders.

6,396 posts

215 months

Thursday 14th May 2009
quotequote all
Won't it be Anti-clock wise, as its a sligtly tighter turn.

Podie

46,645 posts

282 months

Thursday 14th May 2009
quotequote all
Half a mile difference between inside lanes, IIRC

ETA - although technically you can't do a full lap on the M25, as the Dartford Crossing is not Motorway... paperbag

Edited by Podie on Thursday 14th May 16:30

mrmr96

Original Poster:

13,736 posts

211 months

Thursday 14th May 2009
quotequote all
Flanders. said:
Won't it be Anti-clock wise, as its a sligtly tighter turn.
You're right, anticlockwise is indeed shorter. The question is 'by how much?'.
Podie said:
Half a mile difference between inside lanes, IIRC
Not bad.

Anyone else got a guess?

-DeaDLocK-

3,367 posts

258 months

Thursday 14th May 2009
quotequote all
Shame the M25's clockwise lanes aren't banked through the corners, a la Ehra-Lessien. evil

Podie

46,645 posts

282 months

Thursday 14th May 2009
quotequote all
mrmr96 said:
Podie said:
Half a mile difference between inside lanes, IIRC
Not bad.

Anyone else got a guess?
I spent 6 months doing it each direction, each day...

mat205125

17,790 posts

220 months

Thursday 14th May 2009
quotequote all
Podie said:
Half a mile difference between inside lanes, IIRC
How much will that shave off of my lap time?

mrmr96

Original Poster:

13,736 posts

211 months

Thursday 14th May 2009
quotequote all
Podie said:
mrmr96 said:
Podie said:
Half a mile difference between inside lanes, IIRC
Not bad.

Anyone else got a guess?
I spent 6 months doing it each direction, each day...
As I said, not a bad guess, but it's not right.

Podie

46,645 posts

282 months

Thursday 14th May 2009
quotequote all
mrmr96 said:
Podie said:
mrmr96 said:
Podie said:
Half a mile difference between inside lanes, IIRC
Not bad.

Anyone else got a guess?
I spent 6 months doing it each direction, each day...
As I said, not a bad guess, but it's not right.
Not right on your vehicle.

I ran a data logging vehicle... if you want to get proper geeky, the length of the lanes varies as well due to slightly different incline rates... wink

-DeaDLocK-

3,367 posts

258 months

Thursday 14th May 2009
quotequote all
Hmmm... but the tunnel and bridge are not technically the M25.

Since you're being anal... wink

mrmr96

Original Poster:

13,736 posts

211 months

Thursday 14th May 2009
quotequote all
Podie said:
mrmr96 said:
Podie said:
mrmr96 said:
Podie said:
Half a mile difference between inside lanes, IIRC
Not bad.

Anyone else got a guess?
I spent 6 months doing it each direction, each day...
As I said, not a bad guess, but it's not right.
Not right on your vehicle.

I ran a data logging vehicle... if you want to get proper geeky, the length of the lanes varies as well due to slightly different incline rates... wink
I didn't clock it. I worked it out.

I didn't take account of the bridge/tunnel or the incline rates. I do like that incline rates point. (Where's the paperbag smilie.)

Podie

46,645 posts

282 months

Thursday 14th May 2009
quotequote all
-DeaDLocK- said:
Hmmm... but the tunnel and bridge are not technically the M25.

Since you're being anal... wink
See my first post, edited before you posted. tongue out

Podie

46,645 posts

282 months

Thursday 14th May 2009
quotequote all
mrmr96 said:
Podie said:
mrmr96 said:
Podie said:
mrmr96 said:
Podie said:
Half a mile difference between inside lanes, IIRC
Not bad.

Anyone else got a guess?
I spent 6 months doing it each direction, each day...
As I said, not a bad guess, but it's not right.
Not right on your vehicle.

I ran a data logging vehicle... if you want to get proper geeky, the length of the lanes varies as well due to slightly different incline rates... wink
I didn't clock it. I worked it out.

I didn't take account of the bridge/tunnel or the incline rates. I do like that incline rates point. (Where's the paperbag smilie.)
hehe

C'mon then, what did you get..?

-DeaDLocK-

3,367 posts

258 months

Thursday 14th May 2009
quotequote all
If you worked it out and are claiming that as being more accurate than Podie's datalogged measurements, let's see your calculations.

I expect it take into account every possible variable. tongue out


youngsyr

14,742 posts

199 months

Thursday 14th May 2009
quotequote all
Googlemaps is no help, says 118 miles for both, but saying the circumference of the nearside lane clockwise is 118 miles and each lane is 3 metres wide and same again for the dividing barrier in the middel, then that makes the the offside lane of the anti-clockwise lane a radius 18 metres less than the nearside lane of the clockwise one.

As we know the circumference of the clockwise one, we can work out its average radius as follows:

c = 2x pi x radius, so 118 = 2 x 3.147 x r, therefore r = 118/(2x3.147) or 18.7 miles (29,997 meters).

So, using the radius of the nearest lane to the centre, the circumference is 2 x 3.147 x (29,997-18) or 117.93 miles.

So, the answer is the the inner most lane is 0.07 miles shorter than the outer most lane if the above assumpitions on lane width are correct, there are only 3 lanes on each side and excluding any points where the carriageways diverge (tunnels, QE2 bridge,etc).




Edited by youngsyr on Thursday 14th May 16:58

rev-erend

21,536 posts

291 months

Thursday 14th May 2009
quotequote all
How do you sleep at night hehe

Next question - World poverty .. off you go smile

Oh .. another .. The Female mind.. that might take longer smile

mrmr96

Original Poster:

13,736 posts

211 months

Thursday 14th May 2009
quotequote all
youngysr, you're nearly there but if you use more algebra you get a better answer (IMO).

r(a) = radius anti clockwise
r(c) = radius clockwise
c(a) = circumference anti clockwise
c(c) = circumference clockwise

c(a) = 2 * pi * r(a)
c(c) = 2 * pi * r(c)

A standard lane is 3.6m wide. So, assuming 3 lanes each way, plus 3.6m for the central reservation means there are 6 x 3.6m between the middle of lane one on each carriageway. Which is 21.6 meters.

So r(c)=r(a)+21.6
So:

c(c)-c(a)= (2 * pi * r(c)) - (2 * pi * r(a))
= 2 * pi * (r(c)-r(a))
= 2 * pi * (r(a)+21.6-r(a))
= 2 * pi * 21.6
= 135.7 meters
= 0.08 miles

(pi is approx 3.14159265 btw)



Edited by mrmr96 on Thursday 14th May 16:52

youngsyr

14,742 posts

199 months

Thursday 14th May 2009
quotequote all
mrmr96 said:
youngysr, you're nearly there but if you use more algebra you get a better answer (IMO).

r(a) = radius anti clockwise
r(c) = radius clockwise
c(a) = circumference anti clockwise
c(c) = circumference clockwise

c(a) = 2 * pi * r(a)
c(c) = 2 * pi * r(c)

A standard lane is 3.6m wide. So, assuming 3 lanes each way, plus 3.6m for the central reservation means there are 6 x 3.6m between the middle of lane one on each carriageway. Which is 21.6 meters.

So r(c)=r(a)+21.6
So:

c(c)-c(a)= (2 * pi * r(c)) - (2 * pi * r(a))
= 2 * pi * (r(c)-r(a))
= 2 * pi * (r(a)+21.6-r(a))
= 2 * pi * 21.6
= 135.7 meters
= 0.08 miles

(pi is approx 3.14159265 btw)



Edited by mrmr96 on Thursday 14th May 16:52
You worked it out exactly the same way as me, mate just using a more accurate lane width (3.6m as opposed to 3m) and you got the correct number for pi, for some reason I thought it was 3.147!

The methodology is identical and equally open to inaccuracy in its assumptions, particularly the variation in lane width of between 2 and 8 lanes in places.

pembo

1,211 posts

200 months

Thursday 14th May 2009
quotequote all
it's not a complete circle though, there are right and left turns in both directions so basing your calculations on it being a perfect circle would surely give a wrong answer

mrmr96

Original Poster:

13,736 posts

211 months

Thursday 14th May 2009
quotequote all
I see your edit now says 0.07 miles where previously you'd written about 0.4 hadn't you?