I know its not an M3 but...
I know its not an M3 but...
Author
Discussion

deano23

Original Poster:

116 posts

208 months

Tuesday 14th April 2009
quotequote all
....the Mk1 3.2 DSG TT - anyone had an experience in one??

I'm thinking of options available to me IF in the event I sell my E46 M3.

I know it won't match up performance wise, but are they good value for money, fun and do they make a nice noise?

Used to have a 225 TT and to be honest i got bored of the thing pretty quickly. Sexy looking thing though.

dan101smith

17,009 posts

234 months

Tuesday 14th April 2009
quotequote all
I think you've posted that in the wrong forum...

dadofbud

589 posts

232 months

Tuesday 14th April 2009
quotequote all
biglaughbiggrin

deano23

Original Poster:

116 posts

208 months

Tuesday 14th April 2009
quotequote all
Ahem.

Sorry. Just had a moment then.

KENZ

1,229 posts

216 months

Tuesday 14th April 2009
quotequote all
Cant imagine much differnce in point to point speed. The 3.2 will be a lot smoother on delivery of power..but heavy compared to the 2 litre turbo..

Stick with ur E46 M..



Edited by KENZ on Wednesday 15th April 07:15

boobles

15,251 posts

238 months

Thursday 16th April 2009
quotequote all
The 3.2 is a bag of shi*e & the turbo is much better.
Basing that on knowing somebody who has owned both.

deano23

Original Poster:

116 posts

208 months

Thursday 16th April 2009
quotequote all
boobles said:
The 3.2 is a bag of shi*e & the turbo is much better.
Basing that on knowing somebody who has owned both.
I've heard a few say that. I don't understand though how a car with a 3.2 engine be so crap compared to an identical car but with a 1.8T engine??

Anyway, not selling now so don't have to worry about going elsewhere.

E36GUY

5,906 posts

241 months

Thursday 16th April 2009
quotequote all
TT rofl