Baseball
Author
Discussion

Dogsey

Original Poster:

4,301 posts

260 months

Sunday 12th April 2009
quotequote all
Spent some of the evening mucking about with lighting and a few objects that I had handy, I'm rather pleased with how these two versions of the same image came out. Both have been shot RAW, converted using Adobe RAW 4 and then adjusted using Exposure 2 in Photoshop. Constructive criticism is more than welcome.





Click through for the respective Flickr pages.

Edited by Dogsey on Sunday 12th April 01:59

Bob_Defly

5,890 posts

261 months

Sunday 12th April 2009
quotequote all
Nice DOF and lighting!

mikee boy

967 posts

281 months

Sunday 12th April 2009
quotequote all
Quite nice shots.

In the B/W shot I think reflections have affected the word 'baseball' in that the flash has reflected off the shiny surface and into the lens. A polariser can help, but it's not a major problem. You'll always get reflections off a sphere somewhere, particularly if lit from the side.

In the second one I think the white balance is a little cold (blue). Warmer might make the image more engaging?

I have a love/hate relationship with studio work; I'm keen to do it but I don't really like my results!!

Edited by mikee boy on Sunday 12th April 05:35

Dogsey

Original Poster:

4,301 posts

260 months

Sunday 12th April 2009
quotequote all
Thanks for the comments guys.

Mikee ... I agree that the reflected highlight is a bit ugly, but as you say there will always be a highlight point somewhere on a sphere, next time I'll try to make sure it's not on the shiney lettering. The colour shot was deliberately made slightly cold, I thought it looked good. smile

john185k

2,249 posts

243 months

Sunday 12th April 2009
quotequote all
I really like those smile