Last in First out?

Author
Discussion

dan1981

17,646 posts

211 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
Is the above stilla valid (legal) way of choosing who to make redundant?

Cheers

Dan

Mexico.

1,254 posts

199 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
confused

GTIR

24,741 posts

278 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
Mexico. said:
confused
Your fired!

mikey_p

1,273 posts

226 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
If your qualities they base redundancies on match up exactly between 2 people then they will use LIFO, which is as far as I am aware legal to do.

rescynic

175 posts

214 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
Depends on the criteria the company chose for their redundancy process now adays.

length of service can be a factor, sick leave, yadda yadda

i think if i remember rightly from my redundancy that you are allowed to ask what cirteria are going to be used for selecting people.

Fetchez la vache

5,714 posts

226 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
GTIR said:
Mexico. said:
confused
Your fired!
clap

Puggit

48,938 posts

260 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
GTIR said:
Mexico. said:
confused
Your fired!
Pottery?

nelly1

5,642 posts

243 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
Puggit said:
GTIR said:
Mexico. said:
confused
Your fired!
Pottery?
Cannon.

Mexico.

1,254 posts

199 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
I thought shotgunsmile

V8mate

45,899 posts

201 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
dan1981 said:
Is the above stilla valid (legal) way of choosing who to make redundant?

Cheers

Dan
Yes it is. Companies can choose from various methodologies; they just have to be fair and transparent.

It's often still used in companies where a lot of staff are of a similar skill-level.

Though I did have an experience with one company who decided to use this methodology rather than make more effort to execute an effective change regime and lost a senior manager they had spent 8 months courting to join them. rolleyes


Jasandjules

70,773 posts

241 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
It can be used but IIRC cannot be the ONLY scoring method...... I could be wrong there though.

trumpet600

3,527 posts

243 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
I'm sure any company could select this method of redundancy, but they would be safer to dress it up differently

NDT

1,766 posts

275 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
It's a pretty poor selection method but it's still legal.
Would be hard to defend at tribunal if they hadn't tried to assess skills, attitude, behaviour etc

Corpulent Tosser

5,468 posts

257 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
Many years ago I recall that expression being used regarding selection for redundancy, but it was actually worded.

Last in first out, all things being equal.

So someone with a poor attendance record for example could be regarded as less desirable, as could someone who had less qualifications etc.

V6

3,772 posts

233 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
So the last one to post on this thread gets sin binned?





Please reply to this.

sone

4,598 posts

250 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
Companies are allowed to maintain their strongest team regardless of time served. So in essence they can do what they like, making up a score rating based on attendance, qualification etc. In reality if your face don't fit your fooked.

jesta1865

3,452 posts

221 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
it might be worth seeing a gp if you have had a few days sick for whatever reason.

i was made redundant and my sickness record was used as part of it, 3 months after being made redundant, the local GP diagnosed me as diabetic, hence all the time off in the previous few months, didn't know so hadn't adjusted my diet.

its covered by the 1995 disability act and so can't be used against me in such circumstances, a long shot but would have helped me if i had known.


southendpier

5,568 posts

241 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
GTIR said:
Mexico. said:
confused
Your fired!
You are fired = You're fired. wink

anonymous-user

66 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
I'm not sure lifo has been challenged in court. I expect it depends upon your industry as often by default lifo becomes a bit like age discrimination if you work in an industry with little movement of employees between different employers.

I expect most employers using lifo will call it 'lifo plus' and state lifo as the main criteria with other factors being considered like sickness and performance etc.

hornetrider

63,161 posts

217 months

Friday 3rd April 2009
quotequote all
GTIR said:
Mexico. said:
confused
Your fired!
No, you're fired!

wink