ATR Turboprop planes?

Author
Discussion

transactor

Original Poster:

152 posts

213 months

Monday 9th March 2009
quotequote all
Ive booked a flight and after checking through my itinery ive noticed that the plane that we will be flying in is an ATR Turboprop, i just had a quick look on google to see what the hell an ATR is and its got propellers unlike most normal Boeing/Airbus stuff

now im not the most confident flyer anyway and this whole propeller thing kinda puts me off

Does anybody here know much about them, are they no different to other planes ie closed engined types such as the 777

the airline in question is Jet Airways, ive flown with them before on a 777 tho', excellent flight i must say

anonymous-user

69 months

Monday 9th March 2009
quotequote all
ATR is a Turboprop.

So it is just like a Jet engine with a propellor on front. Instead of the jet engine pushing thrust out the back it is instead used to turn a propeller.

It is not a "piston" prop like the planes of the 40's.

Edited by anonymous-user on Monday 9th March 21:18

MaxAndRuby

6,792 posts

247 months

Monday 9th March 2009
quotequote all
If you happen to fly over a volcanic erruption you're much better off in a prop'.

moleamol

15,887 posts

278 months

Monday 9th March 2009
quotequote all
I believe they had problems with the props failing quite often. Because of the way they are designed they are inherently weaker than the standard props you see and can literally disintegrate.

normalbloke

8,079 posts

234 months

Monday 9th March 2009
quotequote all
Don't be such a wuss.The ATR is probably the most dangerous type of plane ever made.Turbo props are notorious for throwing blades when high rpm is experienced caused by the pilot not controlling the engine clutch thus the blades see full turbine RPM.They are fitted with paddle clutches so can be a tad grabby.You're doomed.

MaxAndRuby

6,792 posts

247 months

Monday 9th March 2009
quotequote all
anonymous said:
[redacted]
You sure?

I thought a turboprop was a piston engine with a turbocharger powering a propeller

confused

Edited by MaxAndRuby on Monday 9th March 21:20

IforB

9,840 posts

244 months

Monday 9th March 2009
quotequote all
An ATR is a turboprop. That means it has propellors driven by jet engines. They are just as modern as a 737 or A320 and are often actually a lot newer.

They are a bit slower than jets, but they are used on shorter routes as they tend to be more efficient over shorter distances.

Don't worry about it being an old donkey. It isn't, it just uses a different form of propulsion from what you are used to.

I could just tell you to not be so silly!

IforB

9,840 posts

244 months

Monday 9th March 2009
quotequote all
MaxAndRuby said:
anonymous said:
[redacted]
You sure?

I thought a turboprop was a piston engine with a turbocharger powering a propellor

confused
Nope.

transactor

Original Poster:

152 posts

213 months

Monday 9th March 2009
quotequote all
ahh thanks, shall i go cancel the flight right now?


normalbloke

8,079 posts

234 months

Monday 9th March 2009
quotequote all
MaxAndRuby said:
If you happen to fly over a volcanic erruption you're much better off in a prop'.
Why?

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

270 months

Monday 9th March 2009
quotequote all
This is an ATR turboprop...

You'll be fine...

Do you have a parchute..? You won't need it but, you know, to be on the safe side...


transactor

Original Poster:

152 posts

213 months

Monday 9th March 2009
quotequote all
IforB said:
An ATR is a turboprop. That means it has propellors driven by jet engines. They are just as modern as a 737 or A320 and are often actually a lot newer.

They are a bit slower than jets, but they are used on shorter routes as they tend to be more efficient over shorter distances.

Don't worry about it being an old donkey. It isn't, it just uses a different form of propulsion from what you are used to.

I could just tell you to not be so silly!
thanks

IforB

9,840 posts

244 months

Monday 9th March 2009
quotequote all
transactor said:
ahh thanks, shall i go cancel the flight right now?
Why on earth would you do that you big drama queen? I've flown both turboprops and Jets and there really isn't that much difference fram a passenger perspective other than turboprops are usually a bit smaller and sometimes noisier.

As for turboprops shedding blades.........Oh FFS. If you don't know what you are talking about, how about keeping your fingers away from the keyboard.....

transactor

Original Poster:

152 posts

213 months

Monday 9th March 2009
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
This is an ATR turboprop...

You'll be fine...

Do you have a parchute..? You won't need it but, you know, to be on the safe side...

joker, i doubt its as old as that, if ts got a propeller on the nose im walking

MaxAndRuby

6,792 posts

247 months

Monday 9th March 2009
quotequote all
normalbloke said:
MaxAndRuby said:
If you happen to fly over a volcanic erruption you're much better off in a prop'.
Why?
Engines much less likely to stop. But then I thought a turboprop was a turbocharged piston engine, so forget it and move on.

Edited by MaxAndRuby on Monday 9th March 21:25

Limey 666

454 posts

225 months

Monday 9th March 2009
quotequote all
Just make sure you give the wings a shake to make sure they are not loose before you get on and make sure you get a window by the wing so you can keep an eye on it.

Simpo Two

89,070 posts

280 months

Monday 9th March 2009
quotequote all
Wikipedia knows all:


mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

270 months

Monday 9th March 2009
quotequote all
transactor said:
mybrainhurts said:
This is an ATR turboprop...

You'll be fine...

Do you have a parchute..? You won't need it but, you know, to be on the safe side...

joker, i doubt its as old as that, if ts got a propeller on the nose im walking
No, really....

Brink

1,505 posts

223 months

Monday 9th March 2009
quotequote all