RE: Breaking News: Wildcat Same Price as Griffith

RE: Breaking News: Wildcat Same Price as Griffith

Wednesday 25th February 2009

Breaking News: Wildcat Same Price as Griffith

AJP8-powered Melling Wildcat reduced to same level as TVR Griffith in the nineties



The AJP8-powered Melling Wildcat has been reduced to the same price as a TVR Griffith in the mid-nineties, it has been announced.

Melling is happy to admit that the car is aimed at those who would have once bought a TVR and the Wildcat comes with an updated version of the AJP8. The Melling AJP8 packs 410bhp and the unit was developed in Tuscan racing over 20 years.

The base price of a Wildcat is now £30,000, a reduction of 30% off the car’s original price, and the company said the move was an ‘aggressive bid to kick-start sales’.

‘It’s no secret that times are tough,’ said company chief Al Melling.

'Maybe we’re crazy to launch a car at a time like this, people are certainly hesitant about buying high-performance cars right now. But we’ve had huge interest in the Wildcat, and lots of visitors to the factory.

'We believe that pricing the Wildcat to undercut cars like the Porsche Boxster – while offering a far more powerful V8 engine – should really get things moving.’

Author
Discussion

dickieandjulie

Original Poster:

1,068 posts

264 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
But the Griff is better looking and cheaper............

iRoll

2,335 posts

238 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
The Article said:
the Wildcat comes with an updated version of the V8 fitted to the Griffith.
No it doesn't. Wasn't the Griffith's engine a big Rover V8?

Vedrfolner

86 posts

231 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
More pictures?

Snake the Sniper

2,544 posts

208 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
iRoll said:
The Article said:
the Wildcat comes with an updated version of the V8 fitted to the Griffith.
No it doesn't. Wasn't the Griffith's engine a big Rover V8?
Correct. The AJP8 has nothing to do with the Griffith's Rover V8 engine.

FEZZA_RS

909 posts

192 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
AJP in a Griff? News to me! cheaper than a boxter? Yes thats because its had £2.50 spent on the body work its foul looking!

SaliMali

242 posts

227 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
dickieandjulie said:
But the Griff is better looking and cheaper............
...and with a better interior.

FourWheelDrift

89,640 posts

291 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
dickieandjulie said:
But the Griff is better looking and cheaper............
So's Heidi Klum but you can't buy a new one.

vz-r_dave

3,469 posts

225 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
FEZZA_RS said:
AJP in a Griff? News to me! cheaper than a boxter? Yes thats because its had £2.50 spent on the body work its foul looking!
Cheaper then a boxter, faster then a boxter, more soul then a boxter

Who gives a st about the looks, it looks like a classic and not the usual Porsche that is as common as a bloody TT nowadays.

Oli S

214 posts

206 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
Sorry my bad. Was having a bit of a stoopid moment smile

10 Pence Short

32,880 posts

224 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
What a POS that scoop on the bonnet is. Looks like something vacuum formed over MDF by a 14 year old CDT student.

Harry Flashman

19,946 posts

249 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
iRoll said:
The Article said:
the Wildcat comes with an updated version of the V8 fitted to the Griffith.
No it doesn't. Wasn't the Griffith's engine a big Rover V8?
Not the race Griffith's I'm guessing (totally different car to the roadgoing one, but the article doesn't make that clear).

Mind you, I thought it was the Cerbera that had the Melling V8...

cirvy

2,329 posts

270 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
Sorry Mr Melling, but the car is just not attractive! Need to try again.

LordGrover

33,703 posts

219 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
Here we go again ...

asbo

26,140 posts

221 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
Yet another low volume British car that looks like a dog's dick.

What the hell is wrong with these people?

dickieandjulie

Original Poster:

1,068 posts

264 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
Spot on. The Griff did not use the AJP V8, the Tuscan challenge cars eventually did.

No you cant but a new Griff but I would not buy that new abortion.

FourWheelDrift

89,640 posts

291 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
You do all realise that the body is basically a Griffith bodyshell with extra bits probably needed to prevent overheating, safety and the like?






But then again it's another British car (which we have very little of these days) so let's act all British and talk it down and say it's rubbish like all the others. Well done rolleyes

V8 GRF

7,294 posts

217 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
I've ridden in the Wildcat with the 405 bhp Chevy engine and I can tell you no Griffith ever felt like that. Yes the Griffith is the car that's always mentioned as a comparison but when you put the two of them together the similarities are there, but it's not the blatent copy that some people suggest it is, there's lots of influences of other '50s sportscars in there.

The AJP engine should be a pretty good match for the character of the Wildcat which IMO is much more aggressive in it's appearance and intent than the Griffith.

The Wildcat is not intended to be used in the same way as a Griffith and is more of a trackday/weekend car and that is how it should be viewed in my opinion.
£30k is a pretty good price IMO



If ANY of you guys on here criticising had actually seen the car and had the explainations of what the point of the scoop area on the bonnet is for or how the car was constructed you might be in a better position to pass an opinion.



Edited by V8 GRF on Wednesday 25th February 16:55

Garlick

40,601 posts

247 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
I like it paperbag

Jim Green

449 posts

216 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
Sorry Al, but it looks too much like a mid seventies kit car.

Something needs doing with the rear end, regardless of the fact that it might handle well, it's just not sitting right (And I'm not the first and won't be the last to notice this). Maybe the rear suspension assembly needs re engineering higher into the chassis, this would give the same suspension travel, but make the car look asthetically more pleasing.

The Scoop................ Similar line of thought, it's obviously there for a very good reason, but it's shape, design, needs to be more pleasing to the eye.

With these to items changed, I think the car would look alot more like the thoroughbread it's meant to be.

Aerodynamically, it would be better off with some headlight covers......... Aka Griff.

Soft tops are always hard to get to fit properly and at the same time look good.......... You've only got to look at the Dodge Viper RT10, to see how a great looking car can be spoiled with the soft top up. So we'll let that one go. Maybe something for the new owners to make look a little better.

Really hoping this works out .......... We need another true british brute on the roads.


Me.......I'll stick with my Tuscan, and perfect the engine.



Edited by Jim Green on Wednesday 25th February 17:33

dickieandjulie

Original Poster:

1,068 posts

264 months

Wednesday 25th February 2009
quotequote all
I do not wish to knock it, I love the engine, I like the principle and love the price. I just think it looks ste.