Amazing Images
Author
Discussion

Glassman

Original Poster:

24,929 posts

244 months

Thursday 19th February 2009
quotequote all

theboyfold

11,468 posts

255 months

Thursday 19th February 2009
quotequote all
I do like that type of photography, very cool.

On a side note, the parents (Mr and Mrs Reporter I guess) of the person who wrote that article picked his name very well...

Mr Fenix

863 posts

234 months

Thursday 19th February 2009
quotequote all
Very groovy mahn...smokinppfffff...ahhhippy

Glassman

Original Poster:

24,929 posts

244 months

Thursday 19th February 2009
quotequote all
theboyfold said:
the parents (Mr and Mrs Reporter I guess)
hehe

He's done loads of stuff; click on his name and you'll see he (or she) has written skip loads of articles.

clonmult

10,529 posts

238 months

Thursday 19th February 2009
quotequote all
Total rip off - copying the visual styles/technique of earlier Dean Chamberlain works.

Driller

8,310 posts

307 months

Thursday 19th February 2009
quotequote all
How come the torch can be used to "paint" if there is no medium? As there is no backdrop, what is it that makes the beam stop where it does and get picked up by the camera?

Surely it should just diffuse into the background as it appears to when you look at it directly and not on a photo? confused

The Black Flash

13,735 posts

227 months

Thursday 19th February 2009
quotequote all
Cool stuff!

clonmult

10,529 posts

238 months

Thursday 19th February 2009
quotequote all
Driller said:
How come the torch can be used to "paint" if there is no medium? As there is no backdrop, what is it that makes the beam stop where it does and get picked up by the camera?

Surely it should just diffuse into the background as it appears to when you look at it directly and not on a photo? confused
Long exposures.

Very long exposures.

Dean Chamberlain used exposures of several hours on his early work. And it was used in video as well - Durans All She Wants video made extensive usage of this technique.

[AJ]

3,079 posts

227 months

Thursday 19th February 2009
quotequote all
Driller said:
How come the torch can be used to "paint" if there is no medium? As there is no backdrop, what is it that makes the beam stop where it does and get picked up by the camera?

Surely it should just diffuse into the background as it appears to when you look at it directly and not on a photo? confused
There is medium - the film or optical sensor. The light is pointed at the camera, not away from it. Long exposure, smallish aperture and a light source can be lots of fun.

skilly1

2,894 posts

224 months

Thursday 19th February 2009
quotequote all
Why is he not in the picture? The torch can't move itself !

marshalla

15,902 posts

230 months

Thursday 19th February 2009
quotequote all
Driller said:
How come the torch can be used to "paint" if there is no medium? As there is no backdrop, what is it that makes the beam stop where it does and get picked up by the camera?

Surely it should just diffuse into the background as it appears to when you look at it directly and not on a photo? confused
The torch is shining towards the camera...

Sarkmeister

1,699 posts

247 months

Thursday 19th February 2009
quotequote all
Driller said:
How come the torch can be used to "paint" if there is no medium? As there is no backdrop, what is it that makes the beam stop where it does and get picked up by the camera?

Surely it should just diffuse into the background as it appears to when you look at it directly and not on a photo? confused
Its the same as when you move a sparkler really quickly. The lines arent the beam of the torch, they are the position the torch has been held in. He simply sweeps the torch like a brush and the camera picks it up.

Anyone know where I can get prints of these? (or maybe very high res versions)?

Sarkmeister

1,699 posts

247 months

Thursday 19th February 2009
quotequote all
Just checked his website, prints are available there (not too expensive as well)

Evil Jack

1,649 posts

257 months

Thursday 19th February 2009
quotequote all
skilly1 said:
Why is he not in the picture? The torch can't move itself !
Yeah, that's what I don't get....

Steve Evil

10,817 posts

258 months

Thursday 19th February 2009
quotequote all
I wouldn't say they merit a place in the national papers, there are plenty of similar works on the photography forum here.

The camera won't pick up the light painter as it's too dark, unless you were to stand there long enough for it to pick you up, or were to somehow light yourself up with the torch beam then it simply doesn't register you being there, so by not standing in the same place for too long it registers the scene without you being there, obviously the torch is more intense and it burns into the image much quicker.

One of my first attempts:



And I'm sure he won't mind me posting it, but AndWhyNot on here has done some great night shots:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/andwhynot/2862727680/...

tegwin

1,682 posts

235 months

Thursday 19th February 2009
quotequote all
You just have to make sure you dont stand in the same place for too long...

Because its a long exposure in a dark area, if you dont stay in one place, the light doesnt have enough time to reflect off you enough to make an image in the camera!