BMW Z3

Author
Discussion

Umar B

Original Poster:

1,484 posts

270 months

Tuesday 12th February 2002
quotequote all
I know it's a BMW but what do you really think of them.
I was looking at a 2.8 model and i did not realise how cheap they were going.

just when i made my mind up the get a corrado vr6

anonymous-user

57 months

Tuesday 12th February 2002
quotequote all
z3's are a bit of a let down in my humble opinion. my father has the hairdressers favourite, the 1.9i and its a barge!. heavier than the 3 series compact, and a serious lack of power!................hes currently looking for a >15k chimera

mr_tony

6,334 posts

272 months

Tuesday 12th February 2002
quotequote all
umar noooooo don't buy a clown shoe.

Roadrunner

2,690 posts

270 months

Tuesday 12th February 2002
quotequote all
From the frontal view one of the ugliest cars around. Bloated secretaries car ( the car, not the secretary ). Luckily bm have now copied audi's tt front end for it's imminent replacement. Nice 'M' motor though.

Umar B

Original Poster:

1,484 posts

270 months

Tuesday 12th February 2002
quotequote all
They can't be that bad can they? i know the 1.9 is very slow, but the 2.8 must be pretty quick. OK it won't handle like an elise but it's no barge...is it????

>> Edited by Umar B on Tuesday 12th February 17:07

Roadrunner

2,690 posts

270 months

Tuesday 12th February 2002
quotequote all
read my lips: ugly mutha f*cker

M-Five

11,307 posts

287 months

Tuesday 12th February 2002
quotequote all
Umar, I too looked at a Z3 - when I was replacing my VR6 though.

I was looking at the M Coupe and the M Roadster.
The handling was superb and you could even fit some luggage in the Coupe version.

I was going round corners so fast I though I was going to be thrown out with force. Much more grip than the Corrado.

The 2.8 was just a bit wimpy for what was supposedly 190bhp or so.

The price and lack of rear seats put me off in the end.
The Coupe and Roadster were both about £25k for an early example whereas I got my M5 for £15k!

Dave_H

996 posts

286 months

Tuesday 12th February 2002
quotequote all
I have to agree with other comments, most Z3 owners I always expect them to start conversations with "Going anywhere nice on your Holidays?" or "Would you like conditioner?"

And do you want to buy the brand that no one will let you out of side turnings or give way to you?

What ever floats your boat and all that, but how about looking at what else you can get for the same money, and maybe give you a bigger grin

But if it's a Z3 that lifts your frock - go for it.

Don

28,377 posts

287 months

Wednesday 13th February 2002
quotequote all
Up until recently I would never have considered a Z3 for anything. The low-power engines are "girlie" (no offence ladies - you know what I mean - no disrespect intended) and lets face it - its not exactly beautiful either. Those side grilles remind me of a woodlouse!

However - the M Roadster is one serious vehicle. >300bhp. 0..60 under 5. ABS and proper Electronic stability and all for about 36K new. The updated version even looks a bit better. And I'll bet it will handle quite well enough to be a blast. I'll ket you know after my extended test drive.

Comparing this to its competitor TVRs (Chimaera 450) it is 1) As powerful. 2) Nearly as quick. 3) Has all the modern electronics (I know , I know what do you need 'em for) 4) Is made by BMW.

The last point being both a plus point and a negative.

So its damn good value for what it is?

I'm about to rent one to go on holiday in NZ for two weeks. I'll let you know what I think of the 2.2 version after that.

Mind you. I still think its U-G-L-Y.

griff2be

5,089 posts

270 months

Wednesday 13th February 2002
quotequote all
Umar

I wouldn't be put off by the stereotypical old b@llocks about hairdressers.

A 2.8 litre 6 cylinder engined rear wheel drive open top car for not that much money is worth a look and a drive.

The 1.9 car is underpowered but still good fun for pootling around town with the roof down.

I haven't driven a 2.8, so can't comment - but I would guess its more fun than most front wheel drive cars. 3.0 is fast, but you need the one with the sports suspension otherwise it feels a bit floaty.

The M Roadster is one of the few totally reliable 320bhp sports cars you can buy. Very quick and a superb engine. Handles well and the best looking of all the Z3's thanks to the wider rear wheel arches, huge rear wheels and revised front end.

All the cars are well built (although the Americans don't build BMW's as well as the Germans), reliable and backed by a large company that cares about its customers and has a decent warranty.

I bought an M Roadster because I did 15,000-20,000 miles a year, could not afford 2 cars and when I needed to get from A to B, I had to know for sure that I would get to B! Although I would have loved a TVR, for me at the time it wasn't practical - 3 services a year at £400 a time, questionable reliability - couldn't do it.

Now my mileage is down significantly and I have an old hatchback to do the boring stuff in I can indulge in a TVR Griffith and am selling the M.

However, the M is a seriously quick car and doesn't suffer from the niggles that affect a lot of TVR's (not an insult to TVR, its just they can't spend the same sort of money on development due to the significantly lower volumes, so things will go wrong from time to time). You don't need to pamper a BMW in the same way you do a TVR. (No I don't own one yet, but I have read Steve Heath's book).

Have a drive and make your own mind up.

griff2be

5,089 posts

270 months

Wednesday 13th February 2002
quotequote all
I see mr tony is well placed to advise against buying a 'clown's shoe'. If a 2.8 Z3 is a clown's shoe, what is a 1.8 MGF?

What would you advise he buys instead?

domster

8,431 posts

273 months

Wednesday 13th February 2002
quotequote all
The M Roadster isn't a *very* good handling M car - far too uncommunicative steering and slightly 'soft and distant' chassis. However, it will still outhandle most bits of tin on the road, and it goes quite nicely.

I have done a fair few hot miles in them, and would never recommend them as out and out driver's cars. A Porsche 944 cabriolet has a much better chassis, for example, and an M3 Coupe from the same year is better set-up for the twisties.

No disrespect intended to M Roadster owners, but it is much closer to an SLK than a soft top 911 or Griffith IMHO.

Rgds
Domster

PS I am talking about handling, not grip. If you don't believe how far short the handling falls, drive an M Roadster in the wet. Then get out and drive something with a sorted chassis, like a 968 Club Sport.

>> Edited by domster on Wednesday 13th February 18:08

Umar B

Original Poster:

1,484 posts

270 months

Wednesday 13th February 2002
quotequote all
GRIFF2BE,

Thanks for the encouraging response, i an going for a test drive soon with a local dealer, and i will let everybody (who is interested ) know how i get on.

about the M models, i would love to get one, but insurence for a 21 year old? this is how a recent conversation went.

umar: i would like a quote for an M roadster please

insurence comp: certainly sir, can i ask how much no claims you have.

umar: 3 years

insurence comp: and how old are you?

umar: 21

insurence comp: [very long pause] HHHHAAAAAA!!!!!! HHHHHHAAAAA!!!!!!! HHHHHAHAAAAAAAAA!!!!!
HHHHAAAAAA!!!!!! HHHHHHAAAAA!!!!!!! HHHHHAHAAAAAAAAA!!!!!
HHHHAAAAAA!!!!!! HHHHHHAAAAA!!!!!!! HHHHHAHAAAAAAAAA!!!!!


umr: eeerrrmmm, sorry i didn't quite catch that, how much is it?

insurence comp: [this price is the cheapest i found], well, eerrr, the quote is for £4516. HHHHAAAAAA!!!!!! HHHHHHAAAAA!!!!!!! HHHHHAHAAAAAAAAA!!!!!



i think you get the picture, but suprisingly the quote from the same company for a 2.8 is £1224 fully comp

insurence companies...don't you just love 'em!!


adeewuff

567 posts

273 months

Wednesday 13th February 2002
quotequote all
This happened to me while I was getting my Elise cleaned at a hand car wash. Guy with a Z3 pulls his car up along side me. He's looking at my Lotus and I catch his eye.

"Isn't very luxurious is it?" he mutters to me. I give his Z3 a glance and say "Do you know what the problem is with your car?" He shrugs his shoulders and looks at me anxiously. "It's that" I reply while pointing at the other two Z3's sitting in queue "Not very exclusive is it!!"

Needless to say he ignored me after that. I wouldn't recommend the Z3 to anyone, it looks crap, it drives like crap and BMW won't tell just how much lift they generate at speed!! I'm surprised the wheels stay in contact with the road to be honest....

The car is for posers who think they can show off in a cheap car that resembles a pump Reebok.

Go buy a car to entertain yourself not anyone else - it helps if it does both though!

hertsbiker

6,324 posts

274 months

Thursday 14th February 2002
quotequote all
quote:

Clown shoe



Laugh, I nearly dropped my pint !! brilliant !

mr_tony

6,334 posts

272 months

Thursday 14th February 2002
quotequote all
quote:
griff2b > What would you advise he buys instead?



Well he said corrado / z3. corrado, no question. OR if it came to it a fiat multipla

domster

8,431 posts

273 months

Thursday 14th February 2002
quotequote all
Umar - get a second hand LHD Porsche 944 Cabriolet; cost about 7 grand. I had one aged 24 with 2 year's NCB - insurance came to 1300 quid a year through Nowell and Richards.

Handles a ton better than any soft top Z3, and still looks pretty good. It's no quicker than a 2.8 Z3 though.

Umar B

Original Poster:

1,484 posts

270 months

Thursday 14th February 2002
quotequote all
Thank you all for your input, i get the general idea of what a few people think about the Z3. Chances are i will end up getting a corrado vr6 anyway, although DOMSTER....

quote:


get a second hand LHD Porsche 944 Cabriolet; cost about 7 grand.

quote:


...there's an idea

douglasr

1,092 posts

275 months

Thursday 30th May 2002
quotequote all
quote:
I know it's a BMW but what do you really think of them.
I was looking at a 2.8 model and i did not realise how cheap they were going.

just when i made my mind up the get a corrado vr6


Dont - the only Z3 worth having the the Z3M or MCoupe.
Buy a TVR, an Elise or an S2000 instead...

lrussell5

567 posts

266 months

Thursday 30th May 2002
quotequote all
they're cheap for a reason....under-developed, not up to BMW usual build standards and look awful. There's loads around and dealers struggle to shift them even this time of year. Get a TVR, if you want a more conventional metal box try the S2000. SLK underpowered and claustrophobic.