got a few photos...
Author
Discussion

Dupont666

Original Poster:

22,925 posts

222 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
can you improve them using hdr or are they ok?













the last two i would like to clean up but dont know to use, please help.

Edited by Dupont666 on Thursday 8th January 13:48


sorted now, just the last two i want sorted the others i think are good.

Edited by Dupont666 on Thursday 8th January 13:56


Edited by Dupont666 on Thursday 8th January 13:58

cirks

2,547 posts

313 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
On first glance, I think you'd ruin some nice shots if you used HDR on them!!

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

284 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
Do you have multiple exposures of the same image?

If not dont even think about HDR, HDR from one shot (especialy jpg) is pointless. From RAW you may as well tweak the levels (or shadows/highlites) instead.

Good set of images there, Ithink the iclicle one could do with a level adjust.

...Mole...

2,780 posts

221 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
Do you have multiple exposures of the same image?

If not dont even think about HDR, HDR from one shot (especialy jpg) is pointless. From RAW you may as well tweak the levels (or shadows/highlites) instead.
Not really, all of my HDR images are from single exposures and i am rather happy with the results most of the time. Dose not work too well on dark images though.

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

284 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
...Mole... said:
RobDickinson said:
Do you have multiple exposures of the same image?

If not dont even think about HDR, HDR from one shot (especialy jpg) is pointless. From RAW you may as well tweak the levels (or shadows/highlites) instead.
Not really, all of my HDR images are from single exposures and i am rather happy with the results most of the time. Dose not work too well on dark images though.
What do you think HDR does that levels could not , from one image?

SamHH

5,078 posts

246 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
What do you think HDR does that levels could not , from one image?
What exactly is the definition of HDR?

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

284 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
SamHH said:
RobDickinson said:
What do you think HDR does that levels could not , from one image?
What exactly is the definition of HDR?
High Dynamic Range.

i.e. more dynamic range than a single exposure can capture.

As with a single exposure you cant add any more dynamic range HDR cant do anything more than what a levels adjust etc can.

Remember though the jpg's you see are 8bit, the raw's are 12 or 14 and usualy your working in 16bit in the likes of photoshop.

SamHH

5,078 posts

246 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
High Dynamic Range.

i.e. more dynamic range than a single exposure can capture.

As with a single exposure you cant add any more dynamic range HDR cant do anything more than what a levels adjust etc can.

Remember though the jpg's you see are 8bit, the raw's are 12 or 14 and usualy your working in 16bit in the likes of photoshop.
Yeah, sorry, I know that it means high dynamic range, I was just wondering what the exact definition of that term is (if there is one). I take it from what you've said that for an image to be HDR it has to be derived from two differently exposed photos and that if you increase the brightness/exposure in one part of a photo and decrease it in another part, that doesn't constitute HDR?

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

284 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
No it still will HDR is the process of capturing and effectivly compressing more dynamic range than a single shot will.

Pupp

12,991 posts

302 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
...Mole... said:
RobDickinson said:
Do you have multiple exposures of the same image?

If not dont even think about HDR, HDR from one shot (especialy jpg) is pointless. From RAW you may as well tweak the levels (or shadows/highlites) instead.
Not really, all of my HDR images are from single exposures and i am rather happy with the results most of the time. Dose not work too well on dark images though.
What HDR software do you use Mole; I've never got that to work at all?

SamHH

5,078 posts

246 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
Ah right, so if you want to make the dark areas of a photo brighter without making the light areas brighter, isn't that HDR and isn't it better than making everything brighter?

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

284 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
SamHH said:
Ah right, so if you want to make the dark areas of a photo brighter without making the light areas brighter, isn't that HDR and isn't it better than making everything brighter?
You could use HDR techniques, would be better if it was multiple exposures, usualy (for me) HRD for one file creates a lot of noise.

Or you could use photoshops level adjust to bump up just the dark areas. Or the Shadows highlites tool to do the same.

Furyous

25,742 posts

251 months

Thursday 8th January 2009
quotequote all
Hdr ?

Meh.......

Sorry, just doesnt do it for me. But then Im no fan of the impressionist movement either.

Fine art or not at all.