F1 2003 - What did we think?

F1 2003 - What did we think?

Author
Discussion

steviebee

Original Poster:

13,364 posts

261 months

Monday 13th October 2003
quotequote all
Overall, one has to conceed that things appear to be heading in the right direction at last. A few dull races for sure but only a few (how many dull football games do you get in a season?).

What's interesting to me is that I think the team and driver combo that won was the one that screwed up the least - rather than being the best!

BAR and Toyota could be mixing it a bit next year me thinks!

TimW

3,848 posts

253 months

Monday 13th October 2003
quotequote all
same old F1 shcumacher won!

g4ry13

18,230 posts

261 months

Monday 13th October 2003
quotequote all
I thought it was quite a good season, good to see Schumacher have to work for his championship a bit.

Do you think they should things more interesting by deducting points from a driver if they retire? Although i guess it would be unfair to deduct points from a driver if they suffer engine blow-up, as it's the team's fault. So deduct points from the team.

steviebee

Original Poster:

13,364 posts

261 months

Monday 13th October 2003
quotequote all
g4ry13 said:
Do you think they should things more interesting by deducting points from a driver if they retire? Although i guess it would be unfair to deduct points from a driver if they suffer engine blow-up, as it's the team's fault. So deduct points from the team.


I think if they did this, you'd have drivers tip-toeing round and could probably reduce the racing. What I do think they should do is introduce points for qualifying position and fastest race lap.

Regarding TimW's Schumi comment - I know what you're saying but I think for me, I couldn't give a toss who wins as long as they have to fight and race for it and I enjoy watching - which this year, he did and I did!

I think that's what a lot of non-Motorsport fans don't get - the fact, that unlike Football, we can watch a competition and gain great pleasure regardless of who wins - providing it was a good show. All my footie mates would never dream of saying what a good game it was if their team didn't win or draw!

docevi1

10,430 posts

254 months

Monday 13th October 2003
quotequote all
I reckon the FIA are patting themselves on the back because of the changes they have made gave a good season.

Thats partially true but remember the first few races, people were tripping over the 1 lap qualifying, the weather kept mixing the grid up, in brazil especially... then the points came into play. Yes the rules helped, but it was also circumstance and co-incidence that truly created a memorable season!

The only thing that spoiled it in my book was Ferrari, the way they got away with things, the smugness of the team and the general arseyness of them. Fair play they worked they butts off making the car competitive and the drivers are superb (Ruebens made a fantastic British GP) but still Shame really.

Personally I would love to see someone give Minardi pooh-loads of cash over the winter to improve their car drastically and give some higher up teams a really big scare. The team seem to be able to spot decent drivers on the up, so it would be nice for them to have a car to match

v8 Archie

4,703 posts

254 months

Monday 13th October 2003
quotequote all
It was a better season than we've had for a while with three genuinely competetive teams by the end of it, and a lot of good fights in the mid-field.

Perhaps it's just me being anti-Schumacher/Braun, but I have a bad taste in my mouth over the amount of help Ferrari seem to have had. I think it's really the tyres thing, where Bridgestone refused to supply a genuine wet weather tyre, a decision which impacted on the race-time decisions made by the FIA. That said, if Michelin can't produce a good wet tyre, that's their problem.

hornet

6,333 posts

256 months

Monday 13th October 2003
quotequote all
Not a bad season all in all, although it was still as clouded by politics as ever. Would've been nice to see someone else win, but at least Michael had to work for it this season. Still wish Ferrari would give Rubens a level playing field though, as he proved at Silverstone how good he can be given the right circumstances.

FourWheelDrift

89,375 posts

290 months

Monday 13th October 2003
quotequote all
Well if judged on how many times I fell asleep in front of the TV when it was on, it's better than last year but I'd still give it a :-

7/10 but can do better

anonymous-user

60 months

Tuesday 14th October 2003
quotequote all
only average in my opinion. a world championship needs at least 30 cars but they big teams wont allow privateers given the money they are spending and the smaller teams can barely survive.
the points system is a farce and there should be at least five points between 1st and 2nd... i would propose something like this.
1 = 20
2 = 15
3 = 11
4 = 8
5 = 6
6 = 4
7 = 2
8 = 1

that would certainly generate a bit more "racing" rather than the bore-a-thon that the canadian gp degenerated into this year.

cars should revert to proper gear boxes and no driver aids too. this would bring the costs down and would help reduce the number of retirements. why waste milllions developing semi-automatic gearboxes if they dont work in the races?.........

if the circuits werent so small and rubbish i would consider running f1 and f3000 together but places like the A1 ring where the laptimes are 1m 10s are a joke. f1 should be about 2m 30s lap times, big huge circuits. i saw a plan of the bahrain gp circuit and thought oh dear.......

sorry, back to this season, well the emergence of kimi and fernando was good, the occasional spirited drive from the smaller teams was also good to watch. i thought button was great all year and has proved he is worthy of a big drive soon, as for schumacher, in the end the right man won the championship. he needs some real competition though, prost and senna would have given him a sound whipping at each race. in two years time the fights between kimi and juan pablo will be entertaining. lewis hamilton will probably be on the out skirts of F1 as will piquet jr so it could be good. to be honest, i am just bored of the current drivers, you know them so well in terms of thier driving styles you can predict what will happen during a race.


Incorrigible

13,668 posts

267 months

Tuesday 14th October 2003
quotequote all
Better but could still do better

Kmi Raikonen - Dull as fk bring on Valentino Rossi

I agree about the points. 2 between first and second is rubbish, but only done like that to make it close at the end IMHO

More teams needed

FourWheelDrift

89,375 posts

290 months

Tuesday 14th October 2003
quotequote all
Plus.

1 point for Pole Position
1 point for fastest lap
1 point for leading a lap
1 point for leading most laps

American ideas yes, but they introduced them because, pole position was never locked out by one team (like F1 this year), with fuel pit stops and strategies team pitted at different times, this would add to the question of "when to pit?". Fastest lap would mean they would all race to the finish and leading most laps would mean someone who lead most but then broke down would get something out of it.

davidd

6,520 posts

290 months

Tuesday 14th October 2003
quotequote all
FourWheelDrift said:
Plus.

1 point for Pole Position
1 point for fastest lap
1 point for leading a lap
1 point for leading most laps



I'd agree with something like that. Teams should be allowed to field three cars although one should not count toward the championship.

Oh yes longer tracks and slicks would be nice.

D.

condor

8,837 posts

254 months

Wednesday 15th October 2003
quotequote all
Next year's rules are going to be agreed later on to-day...I've already posted a thread on it a few days ago.

This year I thought was very exciting A big thumbs up to Williams and Renault who did a great job....Ferrari too - shame the Macs couldn't get their 03 car off the test track to the race track.

A very enjoyable season

Graham

16,369 posts

290 months

Wednesday 15th October 2003
quotequote all
a few years back at the begining of the season i would throw a party with beer and videos for the early start and watch it live. the same it the final gp was an early morning affair.



this year, i didnt even realise last weekend was the date of the final race, and only noticed when it was posted here ( although i did watch the rerun in the afternoon)

that about sums it up...


things id like to see


1) slicks!!!!!
2) less downforce
3) tv money shared out more equally to all the teams. the current situation just makes the divide greater.
4) race to the flag.. pits stop strategy Yawn.....FFS i want to watch racing not chess...
5)independant rules enforcment by a single set of judges, not the varience from track to track...

pwig

11,956 posts

276 months

Wednesday 15th October 2003
quotequote all
RE point 5, It is already IIRC.

Graham

16,369 posts

290 months

Wednesday 15th October 2003
quotequote all
indepandant mmmm im sure it just does what max and bernie say....

chrisgr31

13,663 posts

261 months

Wednesday 15th October 2003
quotequote all
This year has been better although some decisions of the Stewards have given the impression of favourtism towards Ferrari.

I would also like to see more drivers prepared to speak their mind, rather than spout sponsor/team friendly garbage. Can't the sponsors see that the public want warts and all, and are more likely to support a team where the press releases say it as it is.

robp

5,782 posts

270 months

Wednesday 15th October 2003
quotequote all
Just a thought.

If the points scoring system was left unchanged i.e. pre-2003 would the outcome have been any different? OK, Schuey would still have won but would it have been such a close finish? Anyone care to do the maths?!

davidd

6,520 posts

290 months

Friday 17th October 2003
quotequote all
have a look at..

www.itv-f1.com/features/features_story/18478

kimi would have been 10 points behind MS, the top eight would have stayed the same.

D.

anonymous-user

60 months

Friday 17th October 2003
quotequote all
makes you realise how good it was that they changed the scoring. Jordan fluked the brazialian GP and got a load of points for it, then did nothing for the remainder. old scoring would have put them higher up but thanks to the new scoring rewarding reliability a bit more and they are right down near the bottom. BAR however, who deserved to be fifth, would have lost out sue to the number of times they finshed seventh of eighth. they should do points for qualifying and points for pole and fastest lap. i do like NASCAR when hte winner has 5000 points, makes you feel like they have done something amazing doesnt it! (though they do something like a billiaon races a season dont they?)

I think it showed the benefits of having more points on offer. though they still need to sort out the difference for the top three but i dont want to sound like a stuck record about this