Congestion Charge penalty - a moot point
Discussion
I've been sent a Congestion Charge Penalty Charge notice for paying by SMS but putting a wrong letter in the reg number. OK - sh*t happens. . But they won't refund the original £8.
It seems to me that if they keep the original £8 Congestion Charge they are tacitly accepting payment was made and therefore the Penalty Charge Notice is null and void.
It might make an interesting legal precedent if I successfully challenged the £8 retention.
Or not.
It seems to me that if they keep the original £8 Congestion Charge they are tacitly accepting payment was made and therefore the Penalty Charge Notice is null and void.
It might make an interesting legal precedent if I successfully challenged the £8 retention.
Or not.
audidoody said:
I've been sent a Congestion Charge Penalty Charge notice for paying by SMS but putting a wrong letter in the reg number. OK - sh*t happens. . But they won't refund the original £8.
It seems to me that if they keep the original £8 Congestion Charge they are tacitly accepting payment was made and therefore the Penalty Charge Notice is null and void.
It might make an interesting legal precedent if I successfully challenged the £8 retention.
Or not.
I cannot see how you could lose in court.It seems to me that if they keep the original £8 Congestion Charge they are tacitly accepting payment was made and therefore the Penalty Charge Notice is null and void.
It might make an interesting legal precedent if I successfully challenged the £8 retention.
Or not.
You are still entitled to a court hearing for fines IIRC.
Scraggles said:
looking at the new ford econotec ? for company car, seems it is immune to the congestion charge soon, if so going to make working in south london a lot easier, just nip across central london than having to skirt around the outskirts 
So how does a less-polluting car cause less to congestion? It's just as big as any other car.
Biggest con going, the sooner Boris bins it the better.
Globulator said:
audidoody said:
I've been sent a Congestion Charge Penalty Charge notice for paying by SMS but putting a wrong letter in the reg number. OK - sh*t happens. . But they won't refund the original £8.
It seems to me that if they keep the original £8 Congestion Charge they are tacitly accepting payment was made and therefore the Penalty Charge Notice is null and void.
It might make an interesting legal precedent if I successfully challenged the £8 retention.
Or not.
I cannot see how you could lose in court.It seems to me that if they keep the original £8 Congestion Charge they are tacitly accepting payment was made and therefore the Penalty Charge Notice is null and void.
It might make an interesting legal precedent if I successfully challenged the £8 retention.
Or not.
You are still entitled to a court hearing for fines IIRC.
audidoody said:
Globulator said:
audidoody said:
I've been sent a Congestion Charge Penalty Charge notice for paying by SMS but putting a wrong letter in the reg number. OK - sh*t happens. . But they won't refund the original £8.
It seems to me that if they keep the original £8 Congestion Charge they are tacitly accepting payment was made and therefore the Penalty Charge Notice is null and void.
It might make an interesting legal precedent if I successfully challenged the £8 retention.
Or not.
I cannot see how you could lose in court.It seems to me that if they keep the original £8 Congestion Charge they are tacitly accepting payment was made and therefore the Penalty Charge Notice is null and void.
It might make an interesting legal precedent if I successfully challenged the £8 retention.
Or not.
You are still entitled to a court hearing for fines IIRC.
Globulator said:
audidoody said:
Globulator said:
audidoody said:
I've been sent a Congestion Charge Penalty Charge notice for paying by SMS but putting a wrong letter in the reg number. OK - sh*t happens. . But they won't refund the original £8.
It seems to me that if they keep the original £8 Congestion Charge they are tacitly accepting payment was made and therefore the Penalty Charge Notice is null and void.
It might make an interesting legal precedent if I successfully challenged the £8 retention.
Or not.
I cannot see how you could lose in court.It seems to me that if they keep the original £8 Congestion Charge they are tacitly accepting payment was made and therefore the Penalty Charge Notice is null and void.
It might make an interesting legal precedent if I successfully challenged the £8 retention.
Or not.
You are still entitled to a court hearing for fines IIRC.
The sheer unfairness of this really blows.
I appealed against exactly the same thing once after paying via Paypoint when I got home. As long as you get your appeal in quickly, they may well let you off, they did me.
I just was polite and said that it was plainly an easy mistake to make. They sent me a letter back saying that on this occasion, and this one only, they would let me off the fine....
I just was polite and said that it was plainly an easy mistake to make. They sent me a letter back saying that on this occasion, and this one only, they would let me off the fine....
odyssey2200 said:
Surely If you can prove that they accepted payment ...job done.
No go. I appealed the PCN and sent in proof (their receipt) that I had paid the £8 that day, but that I had miskeyed a number. Back came a three page letter basically saying "tough sh*t" and giving me 28 days to pay £60. Globulator said:
audidoody said:
Globulator said:
audidoody said:
I've been sent a Congestion Charge Penalty Charge notice for paying by SMS but putting a wrong letter in the reg number. OK - sh*t happens. . But they won't refund the original £8.
It seems to me that if they keep the original £8 Congestion Charge they are tacitly accepting payment was made and therefore the Penalty Charge Notice is null and void.
It might make an interesting legal precedent if I successfully challenged the £8 retention.
Or not.
I cannot see how you could lose in court.It seems to me that if they keep the original £8 Congestion Charge they are tacitly accepting payment was made and therefore the Penalty Charge Notice is null and void.
It might make an interesting legal precedent if I successfully challenged the £8 retention.
Or not.
You are still entitled to a court hearing for fines IIRC.
Unless we have even less rights than I thought (which is quite possible) I thought with any fine you had a right to court. Even with speeding tickets.
Plus 3 pages of legalese is still meaningless unless backed up by the law, in effect the only 'contract' you had implicitly agreed to was that of paying £8 to enter the zone - which you did.
I would be quite confident of getting it to court and winning, although I suspect they will not push it that far - punishing people who have done no wrong is not very profitable..
I'd speak to Citizens Advice - paying £68 is much worse than £8. I wouldn't pay it because of:
1) You paid
2) You can prove that you paid
3) Any implicit contract was honoured.
4) It will discourage them from robbing others.
Also post in the 'Plod and Law' section.
BTW did you know Transport For London had about £50m in IceSave? Ha-Ha.http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article4914371.ece
Plus 3 pages of legalese is still meaningless unless backed up by the law, in effect the only 'contract' you had implicitly agreed to was that of paying £8 to enter the zone - which you did.
I would be quite confident of getting it to court and winning, although I suspect they will not push it that far - punishing people who have done no wrong is not very profitable..
I'd speak to Citizens Advice - paying £68 is much worse than £8. I wouldn't pay it because of:
1) You paid
2) You can prove that you paid
3) Any implicit contract was honoured.
4) It will discourage them from robbing others.
Also post in the 'Plod and Law' section.
BTW did you know Transport For London had about £50m in IceSave? Ha-Ha.http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article4914371.ece
Gassing Station | The Pie & Piston Archive | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff




