Oh yuck

[oldbanger]

I inadvertently strayed onto the Daily Mail website and found this - it's pretty revolting
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1053802/Mo...

[miniman]

That is absolutely fking sickening. Those people need stringing up. How can anyone deny that the death penalty is entirely appropriate in that situation?

[CedA4]

Yuk !! Is that it ??

That's like saying "Oh Dear" when you've found out your mother has been found raped and killed.

fking dismember them both.

That poor little mite.

[S7Paul]

Another one that could have been prevented, obvious warning signs ignored, concerns not acted upon, etc. How many times have we heard things like this over the last few years? Are the authorities too bogged down in red tape & political correctness to recognise the blindingly obvious when they see it?

[funkyboogalooo]

what the fk is going on in this world. I just cannot grasp it............pretty much speechless.

[Snoggledog]

Appalling and sickening.

[grim_d]

Unbeleivable, there is just no punishment harsh enough.

R.I.P

[Penny-lope]

Scum of the earth

Both should be steriled, and then spend a very very long time inside

[Zod]

despite being a lawyer, it mystifies and appalls me that the perpetrators cannot be named "for legal reasons". This is presumably because it is a child abuse case. Pity the council couldn't have protected this poor child during his wretched 17 month existence.

[juice]

Broke its back ? - what sort of sick inhuman st is that...Hopefully all that they did to the poor kid will be revisited upon them in prison.

[dan1981]

"miserable and cranky"

Christ I think with broken ribs, a broken back, bits of my fingers missing i'd have been miserable and fking cranky.

[Pesty]

Its OK.
An investigation will be held to stop this happening again just like the last time, and the time before that etc etc

[Pesty]

"The mother, aged 27, and her 32-year-old boyfriend who was living in the house in Haringey at the time of the death, can not be identified for legal reasons.

The couple and another defendant, Jason Owen, 35"

why can't they name the parents but they can the other suspect?

[oldbanger]

That's what I don't understand - that a pediatrician can notice bruises on a baby on the at risk register but decide not to examine the child because it's irritable. It's back had already been broken ffs .

And then she altered her notes after the child's death

[jessica]

failure on social services for not acting sooner.
Poor little thing.
what does the government say: no smacking so if Mrs normal gives johnney a tap she can be arrested and charge. but these hideous monsters can give their child a bloody good going over and social services visit and let the child stay.

The system just doesnt seem to work at all these days and at what cost.
a little childs life.

[Cheeky Jim]

Absolute sickening and as for the doctor who missed this...I sincerely hope he is struck off..

Edited by Cheeky Jim on Tuesday 9th September 20:37

[mikechandler]

Daily Mail said said:

œ Eight fractured ribs.
œ He had swallowed a broken tooth.
œ Two of his fingernails and the tips of two other fingers were missing. A toenail was missing.
œ Ulcerated lesions on his scalp and the membrane between his upper lip and gum was torn.

But most horrifically the babyfs back was broken, said Sally OfNeill QC, prosecuting.

'That particular injury requires an extremely forceful hyper-extension of the spine by, for example, forcing a childfs back over your bent knee or over a banister rail.

'The effect of that particular assault would have been to cause paralysis from the level of the injury down.'

Hang the sick fkers, no in fact do unto them what they did to the poor baby.

[Aiten]

mikechandler said:

Hang the sick fkers, no in fact do unto them what they did to the poor baby.

I am glad I am not the only one that thinks this!! I don't understand why we don't do it TBH? Instead, we give them have Nintendo Wii's?

[Pesty]

Aiten said:

mikechandler said:

Hang the sick fkers, no in fact do unto them what they did to the poor baby.

I am glad I am not the only one that thinks this!! I don't understand why we don't do it TBH? Instead, we give them have Nintendo Wii's?

awaits the usual PH guardian readers ' you would just be as bad as them' style posts they need rehabilitating its not their fault etc etc.

Edited by Pesty on Tuesday 9th September 20:50

[Meeja]

I can't read that story.

Got through the first few lines then couldn't go on - too sickening.

I will always struggle to understand how anyone can harm a young child - just reading the first few lines of that story makes me want to go upstairs, wake my five and two year olds up, and give them a huge hug - knowing that they are safe and cared for - and woe betide anyone who ever tried to hurt them......