Speed of light
Author
Discussion

Steak & Cheese

Original Poster:

68 posts

217 months

Tuesday 9th September 2008
quotequote all
I was listening on the radio yesterday to a program about the LHC and it mentioned that the atomic particles would be travelling at about 20kph less than the speed of light! Why not just speed them up a bit more and have them travelling at the speed of light?

Is it possible for anything to travel at the speed of light? or faster than the speed of light?

parapaul

2,828 posts

228 months

Tuesday 9th September 2008
quotequote all
Yes. Light.

sadako

7,080 posts

268 months

Tuesday 9th September 2008
quotequote all
Tachyons can also at least do c.

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

274 months

Tuesday 9th September 2008
quotequote all
sadako said:
Tachyons can also at least do c.
Tachyons must do more than c, only massless particles may travel at c. Currently, the only known massless particles are gauge bosons: the photon (carrier of electromagnetism) and the gluon (carrier of the strong force). However, gluons are never observed as free particles, since they are confined within hadrons.

Neutrinos were, until recently, thought to be massless; but, because neutrinos change flavour as they travel, they must have mass.

ETA: Tachyons are also entirely theoretical, never having been observed - indeed their observation presents something of an issue even if they do exist.

Edited by Einion Yrth on Tuesday 9th September 06:40

TimJMS

2,584 posts

281 months

Tuesday 9th September 2008
quotequote all
What's the deal with the Universe being between 12 - 20 billion years old, and 90 billion light years across?

A lot of matter has to be traveling considerably faster than light speed.

CommanderJameson

22,096 posts

256 months

Tuesday 9th September 2008
quotequote all
TimJMS said:
What's the deal with the Universe being between 12 - 20 billion years old, and 90 billion light years across?

A lot of matter has to be traveling considerably faster than light speed.
Where does the 90 billion light years across come from?

toastboy

8,414 posts

250 months

Tuesday 9th September 2008
quotequote all
Einion Yrth said:
Neutrinos were, until recently, thought to be massless; but, because neutrinos change flavour as they travel, they must have mass.
yes True, I saw a strawberry one change to butterscotch just yesterday.

TimJMS

2,584 posts

281 months

Tuesday 9th September 2008
quotequote all
CommanderJameson said:
TimJMS said:
What's the deal with the Universe being between 12 - 20 billion years old, and 90 billion light years across?

A lot of matter has to be traveling considerably faster than light speed.
Where does the 90 billion light years across come from?
why that mine of useful accurate information known as Wikipedia of course scratchchin

Specifically : ^ Lineweaver, Charles; Tamara M. Davis (2005). "Misconceptions about the Big Bang". Scientific American. Retrieved on 2007-03-05.

Edited by TimJMS on Tuesday 9th September 07:00

Vipers

33,514 posts

258 months

Tuesday 9th September 2008
quotequote all
[quote=Steak & Cheese]
Is it possible for anything to travel at the speed of light?
[/quote]

Electromagnetic radiation travels at the same speed as light, ie radio waves.

smile

CommanderJameson

22,096 posts

256 months

Tuesday 9th September 2008
quotequote all
TimJMS said:
CommanderJameson said:
TimJMS said:
What's the deal with the Universe being between 12 - 20 billion years old, and 90 billion light years across?

A lot of matter has to be traveling considerably faster than light speed.
Where does the 90 billion light years across come from?
why that mine of useful accurate information known as Wikipedia of course scratchchin

Specifically : ^ Lineweaver, Charles; Tamara M. Davis (2005). "Misconceptions about the Big Bang". Scientific American. Retrieved on 2007-03-05.
I'm out of date, it would seem. I've been wandering around under the misapprehension that the universe was about 15 billion light years across.

A quick Google for "size of the universe" turns up this link which explains how the universe got so big without having things travel faster than light.

Drop Test b3nxj

1,091 posts

244 months

Tuesday 9th September 2008
quotequote all
TimJMS said:
What's the deal with the Universe being between 12 - 20 billion years old, and 90 billion light years across?



somthing i have wondered,

once you reach the end of your 45billion78billion light year journy (thats if you were in the middle of the universe), whats after that???


edit 156 billion lightyears acrossyikes

Edited by Drop Test b3nxj on Tuesday 9th September 08:03


Edited by Drop Test b3nxj on Tuesday 9th September 08:05

groucho

12,134 posts

276 months

Tuesday 9th September 2008
quotequote all
Drop Test b3nxj said:
TimJMS said:
What's the deal with the Universe being between 12 - 20 billion years old, and 90 billion light years across?



somthing i have wondered,

once you reach the end of your 45million light year journy (thats if you were in the middle of the universe), whats after that???
Room 101

TheCaseAce

700 posts

241 months

Tuesday 9th September 2008
quotequote all
In answer to the OP - it's impossible to get anything with mass to the speed of light, because the amount of energy required to get it there rises (exponentially?) to infinity.

In order to make a particle travel at the speed of light you need infinite energy - i.e. it's impossible.

EM waves (including Light) can travel at this speed because they have no mass.

JRM

2,065 posts

262 months

Tuesday 9th September 2008
quotequote all
TheCaseAce said:
In answer to the OP - it's impossible to get anything with mass to the speed of light, because the amount of energy required to get it there rises (exponentially?) to infinity.

In order to make a particle travel at the speed of light you need infinite energy - i.e. it's impossible.

EM waves (including Light) can travel at this speed because they have no mass.
So why is speed of light the maximum achievable speed? I understand that absolute zero exists when all electrons etc stop moving and have zero energy, but I just wondered why c (or slightly less) is the maximum speed anything with mass can travel?
Has anyone tried it downhill with a tail wind?....

dougc

8,241 posts

295 months

Tuesday 9th September 2008
quotequote all
Drop Test b3nxj said:
TimJMS said:
What's the deal with the Universe being between 12 - 20 billion years old, and 90 billion light years across?



somthing i have wondered,

once you reach the end of your 45billion78billion light year journy (thats if you were in the middle of the universe), whats after that???


edit 156 billion lightyears acrossyikes
Do you mean, what is the 'other side' of the edge of the universe? What would you see if you looked over the wall?

There are theories that there exists a number of universes (Multiverse). Perhaps over the wall is one of those?

Personally I'm inclined to believe that the universe is still expanding into nothing.

I love the idea of nothing. Try and explain it to someone. Nothing is exactly that. Nothing. No light, no time, no existence of anything.

Alex

9,978 posts

314 months

Tuesday 9th September 2008
quotequote all
Light is so fast, it's a wonder we ever see it at all.


rhinochopig

17,932 posts

228 months

Tuesday 9th September 2008
quotequote all
The speed of light varies - depends on the material it is passing through. So you can actually exceed the speed of light, hence...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherenkov_radiation


FourWheelDrift

92,356 posts

314 months

Tuesday 9th September 2008
quotequote all
Drop Test b3nxj said:
TimJMS said:
What's the deal with the Universe being between 12 - 20 billion years old, and 90 billion light years across?



somthing i have wondered,

once you reach the end of your 45billion78billion light year journy (thats if you were in the middle of the universe), whats after that???


edit 156 billion lightyears acrossyikes
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcTHBOjnUss

Dr John

555 posts

246 months

Tuesday 9th September 2008
quotequote all
Drop Test b3nxj said:
once you reach the end of your 78billion light year journy , whats after that???
Travelling at greater than the speed of light you will be travelling back in time and will eventuelly come to The Big Bang and the start of time itself.

Einion Yrth

19,575 posts

274 months

Tuesday 9th September 2008
quotequote all
JRM said:
TheCaseAce said:
In answer to the OP - it's impossible to get anything with mass to the speed of light, because the amount of energy required to get it there rises (exponentially?) to infinity.

In order to make a particle travel at the speed of light you need infinite energy - i.e. it's impossible.

EM waves (including Light) can travel at this speed because they have no mass.
So why is speed of light the maximum achievable speed? I understand that absolute zero exists when all electrons etc stop moving and have zero energy, but I just wondered why c (or slightly less) is the maximum speed anything with mass can travel?
Has anyone tried it downhill with a tail wind?....
This is why, but you're not going to like it. wink