Speed of light
Discussion
I was listening on the radio yesterday to a program about the LHC and it mentioned that the atomic particles would be travelling at about 20kph less than the speed of light! Why not just speed them up a bit more and have them travelling at the speed of light?
Is it possible for anything to travel at the speed of light? or faster than the speed of light?
Is it possible for anything to travel at the speed of light? or faster than the speed of light?
sadako said:
Tachyons can also at least do c.
Tachyons must do more than c, only massless particles may travel at c. Currently, the only known massless particles are gauge bosons: the photon (carrier of electromagnetism) and the gluon (carrier of the strong force). However, gluons are never observed as free particles, since they are confined within hadrons.Neutrinos were, until recently, thought to be massless; but, because neutrinos change flavour as they travel, they must have mass.
ETA: Tachyons are also entirely theoretical, never having been observed - indeed their observation presents something of an issue even if they do exist.
Edited by Einion Yrth on Tuesday 9th September 06:40
CommanderJameson said:
TimJMS said:
What's the deal with the Universe being between 12 - 20 billion years old, and 90 billion light years across?
A lot of matter has to be traveling considerably faster than light speed.
Where does the 90 billion light years across come from?A lot of matter has to be traveling considerably faster than light speed.

Specifically : ^ Lineweaver, Charles; Tamara M. Davis (2005). "Misconceptions about the Big Bang". Scientific American. Retrieved on 2007-03-05.
Edited by TimJMS on Tuesday 9th September 07:00
TimJMS said:
CommanderJameson said:
TimJMS said:
What's the deal with the Universe being between 12 - 20 billion years old, and 90 billion light years across?
A lot of matter has to be traveling considerably faster than light speed.
Where does the 90 billion light years across come from?A lot of matter has to be traveling considerably faster than light speed.

Specifically : ^ Lineweaver, Charles; Tamara M. Davis (2005). "Misconceptions about the Big Bang". Scientific American. Retrieved on 2007-03-05.
A quick Google for "size of the universe" turns up this link which explains how the universe got so big without having things travel faster than light.
TimJMS said:
What's the deal with the Universe being between 12 - 20 billion years old, and 90 billion light years across?
somthing i have wondered,
once you reach the end of your
edit 156 billion lightyears across

Edited by Drop Test b3nxj on Tuesday 9th September 08:03
Edited by Drop Test b3nxj on Tuesday 9th September 08:05
Drop Test b3nxj said:
TimJMS said:
What's the deal with the Universe being between 12 - 20 billion years old, and 90 billion light years across?
somthing i have wondered,
once you reach the end of your 45million light year journy (thats if you were in the middle of the universe), whats after that???
In answer to the OP - it's impossible to get anything with mass to the speed of light, because the amount of energy required to get it there rises (exponentially?) to infinity.
In order to make a particle travel at the speed of light you need infinite energy - i.e. it's impossible.
EM waves (including Light) can travel at this speed because they have no mass.
In order to make a particle travel at the speed of light you need infinite energy - i.e. it's impossible.
EM waves (including Light) can travel at this speed because they have no mass.
TheCaseAce said:
In answer to the OP - it's impossible to get anything with mass to the speed of light, because the amount of energy required to get it there rises (exponentially?) to infinity.
In order to make a particle travel at the speed of light you need infinite energy - i.e. it's impossible.
EM waves (including Light) can travel at this speed because they have no mass.
So why is speed of light the maximum achievable speed? I understand that absolute zero exists when all electrons etc stop moving and have zero energy, but I just wondered why c (or slightly less) is the maximum speed anything with mass can travel?In order to make a particle travel at the speed of light you need infinite energy - i.e. it's impossible.
EM waves (including Light) can travel at this speed because they have no mass.
Has anyone tried it downhill with a tail wind?....
Drop Test b3nxj said:
TimJMS said:
What's the deal with the Universe being between 12 - 20 billion years old, and 90 billion light years across?
somthing i have wondered,
once you reach the end of your
edit 156 billion lightyears across

There are theories that there exists a number of universes (Multiverse). Perhaps over the wall is one of those?
Personally I'm inclined to believe that the universe is still expanding into nothing.
I love the idea of nothing. Try and explain it to someone. Nothing is exactly that. Nothing. No light, no time, no existence of anything.
The speed of light varies - depends on the material it is passing through. So you can actually exceed the speed of light, hence...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherenkov_radiation
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherenkov_radiation
Drop Test b3nxj said:
TimJMS said:
What's the deal with the Universe being between 12 - 20 billion years old, and 90 billion light years across?
somthing i have wondered,
once you reach the end of your
edit 156 billion lightyears across

JRM said:
TheCaseAce said:
In answer to the OP - it's impossible to get anything with mass to the speed of light, because the amount of energy required to get it there rises (exponentially?) to infinity.
In order to make a particle travel at the speed of light you need infinite energy - i.e. it's impossible.
EM waves (including Light) can travel at this speed because they have no mass.
So why is speed of light the maximum achievable speed? I understand that absolute zero exists when all electrons etc stop moving and have zero energy, but I just wondered why c (or slightly less) is the maximum speed anything with mass can travel?In order to make a particle travel at the speed of light you need infinite energy - i.e. it's impossible.
EM waves (including Light) can travel at this speed because they have no mass.
Has anyone tried it downhill with a tail wind?....

Gassing Station | The Pie & Piston Archive | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



True, I saw a strawberry one change to butterscotch just yesterday.