Use an old FD lens?
Author
Discussion

DIW35

Original Poster:

4,205 posts

230 months

Monday 4th August 2008
quotequote all
Anyone think it worthwhile to carry on using an old 24mm FD lens that I found in my cupboard yesterday? Only advantage it gives me over the kit lens on my 40D is a max aperture of f/2.8 instead of f/4.0-5.6.

Quick shot I took today with it at max aperture.


Tycho

12,285 posts

303 months

Monday 4th August 2008
quotequote all
I like that pic. Why would you want to bin/ebay an old lens if it gives you a capability that you don't have with any other bit of kit?

CivicMan

2,211 posts

231 months

Monday 4th August 2008
quotequote all
Bah gum lad, thar's quality like yur no gonna get from thut plastic roobish lens thems chook out these days......

tog

4,964 posts

258 months

Monday 4th August 2008
quotequote all
What FD-EF adaptor did you use?

DIW35

Original Poster:

4,205 posts

230 months

Monday 4th August 2008
quotequote all
Looks like it's going to be a keeper then. Tog I can't remember the make, I got it from a guy that trades on Ebay.

beanbag

7,346 posts

271 months

Thursday 7th August 2008
quotequote all
That looks stunning. Very nice. thumbup

A quick scan of eBay shows stacks of these lenses up for grabs. Just put a bid for one here in Vienna for just €20. I guess I need to then buy an FD to EF adapter which can't be expensive....

I take it when you use one of these lenses, you have to set the aperture on both the camera and lens at the same time?

DIW35

Original Poster:

4,205 posts

230 months

Friday 8th August 2008
quotequote all
The camera doesn't recognise the aperture set on the lens, as there is no electrical connection between the two.

Setting the aperture on both the camera and lens doesn't work because under normal conditions the camera will meter with the lens fully open. Leaving the FD lens fully open for metering won't work either because the camera needs to know what the maximum aperture of the lens is; this information isn't available to it from the FD lens due to the lack of electrical contact.

The best you can do is what used to be called 'stopped down' metering. Because the camera can't read/set the aperture, it just measures the amount of light hitting the sensor, and sets a shutter speed as necessary for a correct exposure.

What I have found with mine is that this doesn't work consistently across the aperture range. It exposes correctly at f/4.0, underexposes by 1/3 of a stop at f/2.8 and overexposes by 1/3 stop for each stop up to f/22.0, by which time it's overexposing by 1 2/3s of a stop.

Haven't quite worked out why it would be doing that at the moment.




RobDickinson

31,343 posts

284 months

Friday 8th August 2008
quotequote all
Rose is nice and sharp but thats hella nasty Bokeh.