Getting a ps3, is it worth the bother..
Getting a ps3, is it worth the bother..
Author
Discussion

MrTom

Original Poster:

868 posts

232 months

Sunday 13th July 2008
quotequote all
if I already have a 360. They share alot of games, only a few exclusives each console, more so for the ps3 recently.
I do fancy a ps3 as its a nicer design and spec is better.Xbl has pissed me off no end with its charges for everything and the fact i can add a credit card in 1 min on the console, but have to ring a call center and 30 days to remove it.
Opinions from owners of both welcome.

Maxf

8,443 posts

270 months

Sunday 13th July 2008
quotequote all
I've got both (PS3 only very recently) - hopefully the fanboys wont be too upsetwink

The PS3 is much quieter and seems more polished (especially the settings/menu screen). The games are virtually identical, graphically. Xbox live seems to be much more active and there are more PHers on it. PS3 has bluray, which seems to have won the HD 'war' (and disc prices seem to be coming down *slightly*.

In summary - get both!

MrTom

Original Poster:

868 posts

232 months

Sunday 13th July 2008
quotequote all
The penny pinching yorkshireman within says I cant have both.

thehawk

9,335 posts

236 months

Sunday 13th July 2008
quotequote all
As a purely gaming machine it would have to be the 360.

As for design, they are both ugly IMO. 360 has better controllers and much better menu and online experience.

skylinecrazy

13,986 posts

223 months

Sunday 13th July 2008
quotequote all
thehawk said:
As a purely gaming machine it would have to be the 360.

As for design, they are both ugly IMO. 360 has better controllers and much better menu and online experience.
Aye, battery powered controllers are brilliant. How does the 360 have a better menu by the way?
Yes, the online is brilliant, you even have to pay.

PS3 IMO

Edited by skylinecrazy on Sunday 13th July 14:25

Kuroblack350

1,388 posts

229 months

Sunday 13th July 2008
quotequote all
I'm a tight-fisted yorkshireman too - and for me it was always going to be the PS3. Purely as it's the better option long-term...

As has been stated already, it's simply a more polished experience, the blu-ray is fantastic, the gaming great, and the 'experience' as a whole is more rewarding. I can't imagine having to pay to go online, simply not cricket smile

Also, if you have other Sony bits (PSP, Camera, Phone etc) you'll appreciate the thinking that has gone into making these accessories interact seamlessly.

It really is that good!

But as I say, it's the better option long term, 12 months ago the 360/PS3 debate was a fairly full-on affair, now with the arrival of more and more quality games, and the demise of HD-DVD, the argument is becoming more obvious.

King of d sofa

446 posts

221 months

Sunday 13th July 2008
quotequote all
All of this is IMO obviously but:

Design: nothing in it the PS3 looks gorgeous and sleek

Controller: Shape wise the 360 is better but the battery life and built in play and charge are brilliant on the PS3

Games: to be fair my xbox passed away a while ago and i couldn't be bothered sending it off, so i dont know whats come out for 360 lately, however with games like uncharted, motorstorm, haze, killzone exclusive that takes some beating and Halo is the 360's crown jewel that isnt very good IMO.


Online: 360 is very very good, however the PS3 is catching up very quickly and by the end of the year it will be impossible to seperate the two

Usability: PS3 for reasons like, sync up your card and getting stuff off the store is childs play, and the stuff on the store is better.

IF you have a HDTV then watching Blu-ray movies is much better then anything the 360 can do, and upscaling normal DVD's it does so much better.

Obviously for me it would be a PS3 and considering all my mates have 360's and im lonely on the PS3 is testament to how much more i enjoy the PS3

Polarbert

17,936 posts

260 months

Sunday 13th July 2008
quotequote all
I thought Haze was supposed to be ste?

franv8

2,212 posts

267 months

Sunday 13th July 2008
quotequote all
skylinecrazy said:
thehawk said:
As a purely gaming machine it would have to be the 360.

As for design, they are both ugly IMO. 360 has better controllers and much better menu and online experience.
Aye, battery powered controllers are brilliant. How does the 360 have a better menu by the way?
Yes, the online is brilliant, you even have to pay.

PS3 IMO

Edited by skylinecrazy on Sunday 13th July 14:25
I'm just coming up for changing my first set of batteries in my controller - after 6 months use. I'm not too upset. If I was I'd get the rechargeable controller batteries.

Still addicted to Halo 3 and Forza 2 - the latter which seems to have an online system that works, and they had the decency to release the completed game, not some half finished attempt to remind people the series still existed.

..and I've got a pc to plug my cameras and phone into.

skylinecrazy

13,986 posts

223 months

Sunday 13th July 2008
quotequote all
Polarbert said:
I thought Haze was supposed to be ste?
It is

Thudd

3,100 posts

236 months

Sunday 13th July 2008
quotequote all
I've got both.

PS3 is great for Blu Ray, and dualshock3 really helps, but the X360 is more fun somehow and has a better controller.
PS3 menu system seems a bit more polished compared to the 360 blades, but the online play is crap/ nonexistent and forget downloads - they're sparse and the download site is badly presented and difficult to navigate.

thehawk

9,335 posts

236 months

Sunday 13th July 2008
quotequote all
King of d sofa said:
Games: to be fair my xbox passed away a while ago and i couldn't be bothered sending it off, so i dont know whats come out for 360 lately, however with games like uncharted, motorstorm, haze, killzone exclusive that takes some beating and Halo is the 360's crown jewel that isnt very good IMO.
IMO and many others, Motorstorm and Haze are not very good. Uncharted was very easy and short, while Killzone will not be out until next year.

PS3 has absolutely nothing that comes close to Bioshock, Mass Effect, Gears of War, Forza 2, Halo 3 (OK, depends on your opinion) plus a solid collection of others such as PGR3/4.

There is certainly nothing in existence that would suggest a significantly better console for either of them in terms of game graphics


skylinecrazy

13,986 posts

223 months

Sunday 13th July 2008
quotequote all
thehawk said:
King of d sofa said:
Games: to be fair my xbox passed away a while ago and i couldn't be bothered sending it off, so i dont know whats come out for 360 lately, however with games like uncharted, motorstorm, haze, killzone exclusive that takes some beating and Halo is the 360's crown jewel that isnt very good IMO.
IMO and many others, Motorstorm and Haze are not very good. Uncharted was very easy and short, while Killzone will not be out until next year.PS3 has absolutely nothing that comes close to Bioshock, Mass Effect, Gears of War, Forza 2, Halo 3 (OK, depends on your opinion) plus a solid collection of others such as PGR3/4.There is certainly nothing in existence that would suggest a significantly better console for either of them in terms of game graphics
Bioshock is coming to PS3, we also have metal gear. Plus, who on here doesn't want the full GT5?

DucatiGary

7,765 posts

254 months

Sunday 13th July 2008
quotequote all
have owned every console for the past, erm, cant remember how long. . . . . . . . but

for online "jump in" to a game the xbox kills the ps3, the awards system and user interface makes sony look like noobs.

for blue ray playback and metal gear games the ps3 edges the eggsbocks.

i only bought the ps3 for mgs and blue ray playback

grid is good though and everybodys golf is also worth a purchase even though most havent really got onto it.

the controller on the ps3 feels flimsy and light, no rumble, the xbox controller feels solid and the add ons availible for it are quality, ps3 bluetooth headset option means you just use the one from your phone thats the only good point ive found so far. . . . . . . .

you can dual boot ps3 though and make it into a decent media centre, although i wouldnt recommend it unless you want geek headaches for a few weeks.

franv8

2,212 posts

267 months

Sunday 13th July 2008
quotequote all
skylinecrazy said:
[Bioshock is coming to PS3, we also have metal gear. Plus, who on here doesn't want the full GT5?
I thiink we'll all be drawing our pensions before they release full GT5.

And we'll be on the XBox 720 Gazillion by then, with sony undoubtedly in the middle of delaying the PS4 again.

skylinecrazy

13,986 posts

223 months

Monday 14th July 2008
quotequote all
franv8 said:
skylinecrazy said:
[Bioshock is coming to PS3, we also have metal gear. Plus, who on here doesn't want the full GT5?
I thiink we'll all be drawing our pensions before they release full GT5.

And we'll be on the XBox 720 Gazillion by then, with sony undoubtedly in the middle of delaying the PS4 again.
You do exaggerate a bit i must say hehe

RobDickinson

31,343 posts

283 months

Monday 14th July 2008
quotequote all
King of d sofa said:
Controller: Shape wise the 360 is better but the battery life and built in play and charge are brilliant on the PS3
lol Mainly because they forgot to put rumble into the controller so it does less..

I use rechargable AA's, same asa lot of stuff around the house, 2 second swap with some in the charger and off I go again. And it nicely pauses the game when the battery goes etc. The 360 handles this better than the PS3 did anyway.

Forza 3 will be out before GT5.

And possibly the 720 too ! biggrin I expect a new MS console mid 2010 to early 2011. I doubt sony are planning one untill 2012 on.

Question is are there enough worthy exclusives on the PS3, considering a lot of the cross platform games are poorer?

Tycho

12,270 posts

302 months

Monday 14th July 2008
quotequote all
RobDickinson said:
King of d sofa said:
Controller: Shape wise the 360 is better but the battery life and built in play and charge are brilliant on the PS3
lol Mainly because they forgot to put rumble into the controller so it does less..I use rechargable AA's, same asa lot of stuff around the house, 2 second swap with some in the charger and off I go again. And it nicely pauses the game when the battery goes etc. The 360 handles this better than the PS3 did anyway.Forza 3 will be out before GT5.And possibly the 720 too ! biggrin I expect a new MS console mid 2010 to early 2011. I doubt sony are planning one untill 2012 on.Question is are there enough worthy exclusives on the PS3, considering a lot of the cross platform games are poorer?
I found that COD4 is exactly the same on both although Live is still so much better.Apparently Sony recon that the console is good for 10 years so don't think it'l be 2012.Posted from my PS3....

Lurking Lawyer

4,535 posts

254 months

Monday 14th July 2008
quotequote all
What's web browsing on the PS3 like?

My 360 lives upstairs in the office-gamesroom but I've just ordered a nice new 42" Panasonic plasma TV for the living room and have been idly considering a PS3, mainly for the Bluray player but also as a second console (not that I get much gaming time thesedays, with a 10 week old daughter!).

'Er Indoors would find it much easier to greenlight the £300-ish expense if I could persuade her that the PS3 could effectively replace the FUBAR-ed laptop for downstairs surfing and photo viewing.

I'm assuming you need to plug a keyboard in to make browsing tolerable on the PS3? I know text input on the 360 via the controller is a complete PITA....

Thudd

3,100 posts

236 months

Monday 14th July 2008
quotequote all
Browsing on the PS3 is rubbish.

The dualshock3 controllers with rumble are OK, but not a patch on the X360. You have to import them as well.

GRID is ace, I bought it on PS3 mostly to have a game to play on it, but it's not an exclusive title. X360 version would be good for online play - there's no split screen racing.