Making a good photo from a crop
Discussion
I would say "What story are you trying to tell?". A photo is like a book. It should tell a story, or emote a feeling. Its not a bad pic, but two things detract from it...your prescence (sorry) in the reflection, and the fact the highlights are bleached out. You could go for a much more severe crop with just the reflection of the seats and the gear numbers.
EmmaP said:
I think the original shot is far superior - better composition, balance and subtle tones.
Cropping can indeed transform a photograph but attention still has to be paid to all the formal elements of composition.
+1 origial looks so much better, 2nd one has lost any interest the first one hadCropping can indeed transform a photograph but attention still has to be paid to all the formal elements of composition.
I like the idea. There are a couple of little bits. Im gonna have a play in PS with it now.. just cause im bored 
The composure isnt bad, although when i see a gearshift with the machined base and no gator, i like to have that as the background. So i would have shot it for birds eye view so to speak... but im common
I think Slight adjustment in curves etc could highlihg the numbers on the ball, and a little bit of cloning to remove you
Nah not really a fan now ive had a play, how about a portrait crop with the shaft and H gate bit.

The composure isnt bad, although when i see a gearshift with the machined base and no gator, i like to have that as the background. So i would have shot it for birds eye view so to speak... but im common

I think Slight adjustment in curves etc could highlihg the numbers on the ball, and a little bit of cloning to remove you

Nah not really a fan now ive had a play, how about a portrait crop with the shaft and H gate bit.
Edited by Goldeeno on Wednesday 25th June 14:58
Flashback time. Back in 1982 the Young Simpo had a 2x teleconverter and a 3x teleconverter. He strapped them both onto his Vivitar 70-210 f3.5 Series One, thereby making a 1260mm fVery.Small. He took a photo of some landscape from his office window and later showed the resulting 6" x 4" print to the resident amateur tog (actually a beekeeper, but that's not important right now). Young Simpo was very proud of his achievement - I mean, how many millimeters can you cram into a 6" x 4" print? - but the tog looked at it and said 'It's not really a photo is it?'. I've never forgotten that, and he was entirely correct.
So, if you wait 26 years, what I just said may make sense
And I don't even keep bees.
So, if you wait 26 years, what I just said may make sense
And I don't even keep bees.Edited by Simpo Two on Wednesday 25th June 22:19
Simpo Two said:
Flashback time. Back in 1982 the Young Simpo had a 2x teleconverter and a 3x teleconverter. He strapped them both onto his Vivitar 70-210 f3.5 Series One, thereby making a 1260mm fVery.Small. He took a photo of some landscape from his office window and later showed the resulting 6" x 4" print to the resident amateur tog (actually a beekeeper, but that's not important right now). Young Simpo was very proud of his achievement - I mean, how many millimeters can you cram into a 6" x 4" print? - but the tog looked at it and said 'It's not really a photo is it?'. I've never forgotten that, and he was entirely correct.
So, if you wait 26 years, what I just said may make sense
And I don't even keep bees.
have you been drinking? So, if you wait 26 years, what I just said may make sense
And I don't even keep bees.Edited by Simpo Two on Wednesday 25th June 22:19

Simpo Two said:
Flashback time. Back in 1982 the Young Simpo had a 2x teleconverter and a 3x teleconverter. He strapped them both onto his Vivitar 70-210 f3.5 Series One, thereby making a 1260mm fVery.Small. He took a photo of some landscape from his office window and later showed the resulting 6" x 4" print to the resident amateur tog (actually a beekeeper, but that's not important right now). Young Simpo was very proud of his achievement - I mean, how many millimeters can you cram into a 6" x 4" print? - but the tog looked at it and said 'It's not really a photo is it?'. I've never forgotten that, and he was entirely correct.
So, if you wait 26 years, what I just said may make sense
And I don't even keep bees.
Great, what am i gonna do for the next 26 years??So, if you wait 26 years, what I just said may make sense
And I don't even keep bees.I do understand that the pic doesn't have much substance or subject but i think i just got excited and caught in the moment because I zoomed in to a pic and saw myself in a gear stick!
curtisl said:
I do understand that the pic doesn't have much substance or subject but i think i just got excited and caught in the moment because I zoomed in to a pic and saw myself in a gear stick!
Yep! No problem with that at all, you're seeing what your kit/pooting skills will do - learn by doing is good. Kittens play with string; then they eat lions. The seagulls follow the tractor etc.Actually I think I'll get some lunch...
Gassing Station | Photography & Video | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff






