Discussion
adamjt7 said:
As we have a good full moon at the moment i deciced to post a pic before the cloud moves in.
http://i219.photobucket.com/albums/cc232/adamjt7/m...
Lucky you...just attached the telephoto lens onto the 10D ready to snap away and was greated with nothing more than fog http://i219.photobucket.com/albums/cc232/adamjt7/m...

Zipster said:
DIW, can I get some technical information from you on this? What kind of shutter speed are you using? I've tried photographing the moon, but the end result always is kinda blurry due to a long exposure, and of course the moon is moving.
Or is it the earth that's moving? I forget!
If the exif is preserved correctly, download the shot, right click and select proporties and all should be revealed (shot on an EOS 40D at 1/60 on ISO-100, not sure on the aperture as it's listed as 0!)Or is it the earth that's moving? I forget!
slinky
The reason the aperture is showing as 0 is because I am using an old Tamron lens that needs to be fitted to the 40D with an adapter. The lens itself is a mirror 500mm which is fixed at f/8.0. The adapter soaks up some of the available light, as does the 2x converter I was using. I think the equivalent f stop was somewhere in the region of f/13.
For anyone who is interested in taking shots of the moon, but aren't sure what settings to start with to put them in the ballpark for a correct exposure, try this link. http://www.shaystephens.com/moon_calc.php
It tells you what shutter speed to use for any given aperture and ISO, dependent on the phase of the moon.
HTH
For anyone who is interested in taking shots of the moon, but aren't sure what settings to start with to put them in the ballpark for a correct exposure, try this link. http://www.shaystephens.com/moon_calc.php
It tells you what shutter speed to use for any given aperture and ISO, dependent on the phase of the moon.
HTH
Edited by DIW35 on Tuesday 19th February 22:49
Great shot. Must try harder with mine. Get caught up with the scope. Last attempt with the camera and lens ended in overexposure.
Scope shot.

Edited to include pic
Scope shot.

Edited to include pic
Edited by jmorgan on Tuesday 19th February 23:05
Edited by jmorgan on Wednesday 20th February 00:14
Edited by jmorgan on Wednesday 20th February 00:15
I've tried through a scope, but haven't been able to eliminate problems with vibration that ends up in an unsharp image. Scope I had access to also suffers from chromatic aberration.
Love that series of the eclipse. Unfortunately I didn't own a DSLR when that last happened, and my little point and shoot just wasn't up to the task.
Love that series of the eclipse. Unfortunately I didn't own a DSLR when that last happened, and my little point and shoot just wasn't up to the task.
Edited by DIW35 on Tuesday 19th February 23:14
DIW35 said:
I've tried through a scope, but haven't been able to eliminate problems with vibration that ends up in an unsharp image. Scope I had access to also suffers from chromatic aberration.
Love that series of the eclipse. Unfortunately I didn't own a DSLR when that last happened, and my little point and shoot just wasn't up to the task.
Ah! My issues until recently. Bought a remote lead and used the shutter lockup function. I was surprised how much the shutter would shake the think until I thought about it.Love that series of the eclipse. Unfortunately I didn't own a DSLR when that last happened, and my little point and shoot just wasn't up to the task.
Edited by DIW35 on Tuesday 19th February 23:14
So, I set the camera to the "bulb" option. Shutter lock up and give it a few seconds then take the shot. That is the result in my reply above.
DIW35 said:
The only other way I could think of to avoid it was to take a leaf out of the old time photographer's book. Put the camera on bulb, with a piece of black card held in front of the telescope. Wait for everything to settle down, move the card to expose and then replace it.
No shutter lockup? It really threw me for a while until I twigged and read the camera manual. The pressing with the finger was bad enough.Think my settings were 1/160 and iso 1600. If its digital, what is to lose apart from time

jmorgan said:
DIW35 said:
The only other way I could think of to avoid it was to take a leaf out of the old time photographer's book. Put the camera on bulb, with a piece of black card held in front of the telescope. Wait for everything to settle down, move the card to expose and then replace it.
No shutter lockup? It really threw me for a while until I twigged and read the camera manual. The pressing with the finger was bad enough.Think my settings were 1/160 and iso 1600. If its digital, what is to lose apart from time

1/1000 / f4.5 / iso100 / mirror lockup / Image Stabiliser off / manual focus / cable release or remote / sturdy tripod
^ that's my recommendations ^
Here's my most recent moon shot (21st jan 2008), taken with Canon 40D and Canon 100-400mm

sorry for the large version..
^ that's my recommendations ^
Here's my most recent moon shot (21st jan 2008), taken with Canon 40D and Canon 100-400mm

sorry for the large version..
Edited by hawkaye on Wednesday 20th February 00:06
Gassing Station | Photography & Video | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff








