Roisson
Author
Discussion

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

83 months

Monday 11th February 2008
quotequote all
A quick scan through the Noble forums and there doesn't seem to be anything about the update from Roisson:

http://www.rossioncars.com/pages/gallery/gallery.h...

Its nearing production apparently. And they've mucked about with the styling and interior...

caccobra

340 posts

265 months

Monday 11th February 2008
quotequote all
You'll probably learn more about it here:

http://www.nobleforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=20

anonymous-user

Original Poster:

83 months

Tuesday 12th February 2008
quotequote all
caccobra said:
You'll probably learn more about it here:

http://www.nobleforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Hahaha. The "its not a noble, its a roisson" argument was fun! Personnally, I think this venture is going to fail as the US is not a good sales base for this kind of car.

caccobra

340 posts

265 months

Tuesday 12th February 2008
quotequote all
fatbutt said:
caccobra said:
You'll probably learn more about it here:

http://www.nobleforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Hahaha. The "its not a noble, its a roisson" argument was fun! Personnally, I think this venture is going to fail as the US is not a good sales base for this kind of car.
Really? What makes you think that?

AMG Merc

11,955 posts

282 months

Tuesday 12th February 2008
quotequote all
BTW, it's "Rossion".

F.C.

3,901 posts

237 months

Tuesday 12th February 2008
quotequote all
fatbutt said:
caccobra said:
You'll probably learn more about it here:

http://www.nobleforums.com/forumdisplay.php?f=20
Hahaha. The "its not a noble, its a roisson" argument was fun! Personnally, I think this venture is going to fail as the US is not a good sales base for this kind of car.
Err, I think you'll find petrol heads are the same the world over and will be falling over themselves to acquire such a fine vehicle even if it does have a rubbish name.

However the Bullshit that comes with it is a little OTT ... (the bit about the sheild logo)

http://www.rossioncars.com/pages/company_info/comp...
Pretentious Moi?hurl
F.C.


Edited by F.C. on Tuesday 12th February 08:55

nigelw

706 posts

230 months

Tuesday 12th February 2008
quotequote all
Am I the only person who actually think that the noble looks better inside and out compared with the Rossion ? I dont really like the look of the Rossion that much especially when it doesnt have a rear wing fitted ..... I'd prefer a new , upgraded M400 if it was being manufactured , TBH ,

F.C.

3,901 posts

237 months

Tuesday 12th February 2008
quotequote all
nigelw said:
Am I the only person who actually think that the noble looks better inside and out compared with the Rossion ? I dont really like the look of the Rossion that much especially when it doesnt have a rear wing fitted ..... I'd prefer a new , upgraded M400 if it was being manufactured , TBH ,
Agreed the car looks un-finished without the wing but it is essentially an up-graded M400
with arguably better aerodynamics and by the sound of it a better engine management set-up.
It won't be too long before someone starts grey importing RHD cars via Europe.
A nice bonus for current M12 owners is that there is now a new point of sale for most chassis components albeit across the pond.
F.C.

nigelw

706 posts

230 months

Tuesday 12th February 2008
quotequote all
Agreed about the parts supply , but the interior looks a bit too much like a ford Mondeo or something bland whereas when you are in a Noble you feel like your are in a Le Mans car or a sports Gt racer . I dont really know how much time either the Noble of the Rossion spent in a wind tunnel but the Rossion looks like they just cosmetically hacked it around ( I am prepared to be corrected about windtunnel work etc ) but if the rossion has had extensive work in a wind tunnel I cant see how it can be properly balanced both with or without a wing that size ? .....once again , it's only my opinion , not having a go at Rossion or anyone who likes it , just interested what the balance of forum members is about the two Marques .

ThatPhilBrettGuy

11,810 posts

269 months

Tuesday 12th February 2008
quotequote all
nigelw said:
I dont really know how much time either the Noble of the Rossion spent in a wind tunnel
I do! Noble = none. Rossion = probably none.

nigelw

706 posts

230 months

Tuesday 12th February 2008
quotequote all
laugh ...whats the fastest that anyones had out of a Noble ? ...was it stable ? ...I'll start with a pathetic 140 mph ...

Edited by nigelw on Tuesday 12th February 10:18

F.C.

3,901 posts

237 months

Tuesday 12th February 2008
quotequote all
nigelw said:
Agreed about the parts supply , but the interior looks a bit too much like a ford Mondeo or something bland whereas when you are in a Noble you feel like your are in a Le Mans car or a sports Gt racer . I dont really know how much time either the Noble of the Rossion spent in a wind tunnel but the Rossion looks like they just cosmetically hacked it around ( I am prepared to be corrected about windtunnel work etc ) but if the rossion has had extensive work in a wind tunnel I cant see how it can be properly balanced both with or without a wing that size ? .....once again , it's only my opinion , not having a go at Rossion or anyone who likes it , just interested what the balance of forum members is about the two Marques .
The rear wing is largely cosmetic and has little effect at anything like normal road speed anyway.
F.C.

ThatPhilBrettGuy

11,810 posts

269 months

Tuesday 12th February 2008
quotequote all
nigelw said:
laugh ...whats the fastest that anyones had out of a Noble ? ...was it stable ? ...I'll start with a pathetic 140 mph ...

Edited by nigelw on Tuesday 12th February 10:18
I've had 180mph on the rev limiter in 6th. I believe AdrianW had 187mph out of him because he raised his rev limit a bit. All on GPS and through the beams at VMAX.

At 180mph the car moves around a bit, but some of that is the surface at Bruntingthorpe. fine under braking at that speed. You can still just stand on them with no problems. The wind noise is epic!

Jenx (V6GTO)

11,579 posts

271 months

Tuesday 12th February 2008
quotequote all
Flat out...169...solid as a rock.

Martin.

nigelw

706 posts

230 months

Tuesday 12th February 2008
quotequote all
Hmmm .probably a winner first go (unless some of our American brethren will have gone quicker , when they wake up in a few hours ) ....gotta slightly disagree about rear wing downforce , it is an aerofoil section and , if you drag something THAT big through the air (with adjustable angle) its GOTTA have a fairly substantial effect ....I know what a small change of angle on the wings of single seaters can do ...I agree that at slow road speeds it probably doesnt have much effect though smile

Edited by nigelw on Tuesday 12th February 10:33

AMG Merc

11,955 posts

282 months

Tuesday 12th February 2008
quotequote all
nigelw said:
Hmmm .probably a winner first go (unless some of our American brethren will have gone quicker , when they wake up in a few hours ) ....gotta slightly disagree about rear wing downforce , it is an aerofoil section and , if you drag something THAT big through the air (with adjustable angle) its GOTTA have a fairly substantial effect ....I know what a small change of angle on the wings of single seaters can do ...I agree that at slow road speeds it probably doesnt have much effect though smile

Edited by nigelw on Tuesday 12th February 10:33
Maybe but remember there's already a large wing at the rear. BTW, the factory always said the wing does nothing under c. 120mph and is most useful on track in bends!

F.C.

3,901 posts

237 months

Tuesday 12th February 2008
quotequote all
nigelw said:
Hmmm .probably a winner first go (unless some of our American brethren will have gone quicker , when they wake up in a few hours ) ....gotta slightly disagree about rear wing downforce , it is an aerofoil section and , if you drag something THAT big through the air (with adjustable angle) its GOTTA have a fairly substantial effect ....I know what a small change of angle on the wings of single seaters can do ...I agree that at slow road speeds it probably doesnt have much effect though smile

Edited by nigelw on Tuesday 12th February 10:33
Unfortunately the roof line of the car efficiently negates all but the very ends of the wing from the airflow.
Others have established this to be the case and is also partly to blame for the lack of air supply to the intercooler.
F.C.

nigelw

706 posts

230 months

Tuesday 12th February 2008
quotequote all
getmecoat

ThatPhilBrettGuy

11,810 posts

269 months

Tuesday 12th February 2008
quotequote all
F.C. said:
Unfortunately the roof line of the car efficiently negates all but the very ends of the wing from the airflow.
Want a bet? Hopefully Racecar Engineering mag will run their article that explains some of what actually happens to the air around the M12 soon.

nigelw

706 posts

230 months

Tuesday 12th February 2008
quotequote all
Its all about angle of attack I would guess . It's true that the ends of the wing in clear air will exert more downforce , and , I would imagine that the roof does , "mask" airflow to the intercooler and , to a lesser degree, the centre of the rear wing . The centre section will see a steeper angle of attack from the airflow as it spills off the roof and this is why a lot of sports / Gt racers have "twisted" rear wings in the centre section , to address this difference in angle of approach of the airflow ....in other words I agree with you ! smile