Ok, last question about this infernal turbo s...
Ok, last question about this infernal turbo s...
Author
Discussion

supermono

Original Poster:

7,464 posts

278 months

Friday 16th March 2007
quotequote all
Who has gone from owning an "ordinary" turbo to an X50 or turbo S?

How did they find the trade off between the responsiveness/perkiness of the tt and the higher-end stonk of the X50? I don't mean first impressions from a test drive, I mean proper ownership with time to get accustomed to it?

Cheers
SM

Grant3

3,710 posts

285 months

Friday 16th March 2007
quotequote all
Supermono: I can't help with the direct comparison you are making, only had the TT not the X-50 or S...BUT

Prior to the Turbo I made the move from a 996C2 into the new facelift 996C2, now the new facelift was a better car in all ways, more grunt, better spec etc, but do you know the thing it was just more of the same, after I had got used to the little extra grunt & decent stereo it was like I was still in my old car & I ended up swapping it in within the year.
I hope you know what I am saying,the 996TTS is just like what you already have (according to your profile a standard 996TT) with a little more pep!! I had a sports exhaust on my TT which gave about an extra 20 horses, had a little acceleration test with an S & you know what, nothing in it!

If it isn't costing a boat load of cash to change then fine, a bit more pep is always welcome, but if there is a lot of ££££££ involved I honestly wouldn't bother, after a few weeks you will feel like you are still sitting in your old car again! Having said all this you have my sympathy the 996TT is a very hard car to replace, I had mine for nearly 4 years!!!

Best of luck I can tell this decision is getting under your skin!


Edited by Grant3 on Friday 16th March 09:23

RSJ

579 posts

288 months

Friday 16th March 2007
quotequote all
Andy

Bring the turbo back to us.
You know you want the yellow gt3 !

www.rsjsportscars.co.uk/vehicles/porsche_911_996_gt3_comfort_36_3.htm

Ps.We need 10 more sales by 31st March to get to the annual year end target.


Edited by RSJ on Friday 16th March 16:33

paultje

1,042 posts

269 months

Friday 16th March 2007
quotequote all
Temptress...........Get thee behind me Satan.......idea

blueb8

114 posts

246 months

Friday 16th March 2007
quotequote all
I hired a standard 996tt for a weekend, to help me decide if i wanted one. I ended up buying an x50, and you do notice the extra turbo lag, but then because of the bigger turbos it pulls better at higher revs. So on tight twisty roads the standard car maybe better, but its nice to know you've got that bit extra power. Also peak torque is quite a bit higher (414lb vs 457lb)) although its developed higher up the rev range.

slippydiff

16,449 posts

253 months

Friday 16th March 2007
quotequote all
The larger X50/GT2 turbos need plenty of heat energy in/through them to improve their response.
If you want to improve the lag I find it best to drive the car more like a normally aspirated car and keep the engine "on the boil" rather than surfing the wave of torque and short shifting.

If you let everything get "cold" (or are just plain lazy) the bigger turbos can catch you unaware when you go for a snap overtaking manouvre ( as I found out last weekend when I left the car in fourth whilst attempting an overtake) this having followed a queue of cars for some distance at a snails pace when an overtaking opportunity presented itself.
I buried the throttle and waited, thinking that the boost would arrive shortly............ I then waited some more.............. and some more ...............and some more yikes finally after what seemed like an eternity the old girl came to the boil and off we flew (cue much headlamp flashing from the approaching car rolleyes)

I think if I'm honest, the above was more a case of me being lazy rather than any fault of the larger turbos (and had I changed down into third there wouldn't have been an issue)

I know the X50 TT I drove felt laggy, but having driven my GT2 and got everything nice and hot, the "extra" lag is not an issue IMO. (and as someone said, the wallop up at the top end more than makes up for any deficiency low down hehe )

If you can get a test drive with a passenger who doesn't frighten easily laugh try driving the car hard enough to get some "proper" heat into the turbos and exhaust (not a single thrash up to 120mph as this won't build up any meaningful heat) and you'll be able to see for yourself if the trade off is acceptable.

supermono

Original Poster:

7,464 posts

278 months

Sunday 18th March 2007
quotequote all
Thanks for that. As it goes this particular turbo s wasn't for me but I'm still looking. However, I drove the tt last night to a party across some suffolk roads about 50 miles there and back, returning around midnight.

Dry roads, cool air, 3rd/4th/5th gear stuff, it was completely awesome. With the hard work and heat mentioned, it was totally surging out of corners and along the straights, utterly composed most () of the time and relentless. Actually one of the best drives I've had in it.

Did leave me wondering why I'd want to spend 20k more on pretty much the same thing

SM

supermono

Original Poster:

7,464 posts

278 months

Sunday 18th March 2007
quotequote all
RSJ said:
Andy

Bring the turbo back to us.
You know you want the yellow gt3 !

www.rsjsportscars.co.uk/vehicles/porsche_911_996_gt3_comfort_36_3.htm

Ps.We need 10 more sales by 31st March to get to the annual year end target.


Edited by RSJ on Friday 16th March 16:33


I know what you're saying about that GT3, but I really don't know that I want a GT3 -- on real roads I'd miss the composure and wide power band of the Turbo. However if you get a sniff of a Turbo S especially in Atlas Grey please give me a buzz...

SM

cableguy

2,287 posts

239 months

Sunday 18th March 2007
quotequote all
supermono said:
RSJ said:
Andy

Bring the turbo back to us.
You know you want the yellow gt3 !

www.rsjsportscars.co.uk/vehicles/porsche_911_996_gt3_comfort_36_3.htm

Ps.We need 10 more sales by 31st March to get to the annual year end target.


Edited by RSJ on Friday 16th March 16:33


I know what you're saying about that GT3, but I really don't know that I want a GT3 -- on real roads I'd miss the composure and wide power band of the Turbo. However if you get a sniff of a Turbo S especially in Atlas Grey please give me a buzz...

SM


OPC Cambridge have got an Atlas Grey Turbo S (Manual) in stock, 54 Plate with 40k miles at £64,849

C.

supermono

Original Poster:

7,464 posts

278 months

Sunday 18th March 2007
quotequote all
Indeed. I checked it out yesterday and it's not for me, unfortunately...

SM

wetwipe

3,019 posts

243 months

Sunday 18th March 2007
quotequote all
supermono said:
Indeed. I checked it out yesterday and it's not for me, unfortunately...

SM


what didnt you like about the car?

guyvert1

2,161 posts

272 months

Sunday 18th March 2007
quotequote all
Probably the 10,000 miles extra on the clock for an extra £15k+

wetwipe

3,019 posts

243 months

Sunday 18th March 2007
quotequote all
guyvert1 said:
Probably the 10,000 miles extra on the clock for an extra £15k+


laugh

good ole OPC's you've got to love em

supermono

Original Poster:

7,464 posts

278 months

Sunday 18th March 2007
quotequote all
Well the deal might have worked out after duking it out, but there were things that I weren't comfortable with about that car. If anyone wants to know I'll private them but I won't go into it on a public forum in case it's just me being a bit particular

SM