blue peter lens
Discussion
As I go into day 45 without an internet connection at home (thankyou very much Sky Broadband) I find that when I'm working lates my boredom levels hit a record high.
So I decide I'll fashion myself a super macro lens, following on from my earlier attempts with stacked lenses
10 minutes later and I've got one big pile of kitchen roll, and one of these:
It's a 50mm f/1.8 reversed onto a Kitchen roll tube, I call it the Niiikooon 350mm f/1.8 Soopermicro.
Moving swiftly on, first results were crap, hand holding it is a non-starter, so I rigged up an elaborate balancing act, and draped a black t-shirt over the lot to stop any stray light getting in, since the connection between cardboard tube and camera body was hardly high-tech.
At these levels of magnification stuff starts to look quite different...
Grooves on a record:
Some speaker wire
A bit of my hair
Some nylon string
Grains of sugar
Obligatory lens cap shot
My fingerprint
The edge of a door key:
The lion on the back of a 10 pence piece
I'd say about 3 or 4mm of subject fills the entire frame, so I guess this makes the magnification level about 5:1
So I decide I'll fashion myself a super macro lens, following on from my earlier attempts with stacked lenses
10 minutes later and I've got one big pile of kitchen roll, and one of these:
It's a 50mm f/1.8 reversed onto a Kitchen roll tube, I call it the Niiikooon 350mm f/1.8 Soopermicro.
Moving swiftly on, first results were crap, hand holding it is a non-starter, so I rigged up an elaborate balancing act, and draped a black t-shirt over the lot to stop any stray light getting in, since the connection between cardboard tube and camera body was hardly high-tech.
At these levels of magnification stuff starts to look quite different...
Grooves on a record:
Some speaker wire
A bit of my hair
Some nylon string
Grains of sugar
Obligatory lens cap shot
My fingerprint
The edge of a door key:
The lion on the back of a 10 pence piece
I'd say about 3 or 4mm of subject fills the entire frame, so I guess this makes the magnification level about 5:1
Nice photos there, they look good. Instead of just holding the tube to the camera, you can buy the machined adapters off eBay for about £11, if you could somehow attach one of them to the tube then it might be a bit less likely to allow light in.
Impressed though, even if it is only Niiikoon
Impressed though, even if it is only Niiikoon
Graham - yes it's the carboard end that goes up against the body. I tried fixing it in place but it didn't work out.
Just found these camera bellows for £20 so you'd basically have to be a bit silly to make one yourself.
Bob, these are all uncropped except for the grooves in the record which is about a 30% crop.
Just found these camera bellows for £20 so you'd basically have to be a bit silly to make one yourself.
Bob, these are all uncropped except for the grooves in the record which is about a 30% crop.
Edited by _dobbo_ on Thursday 23 November 20:17
RobDickinson said:
No vinigareting?
I assume then thre all shot at f.18 wide open..
I assume then thre all shot at f.18 wide open..

Nope, at f/1.8 the DOF is probably about 0.01mm, and totally unmanageable. These are shot at about f/5.6 if I remember. Anything more than that and there is insufficient light to see the subject.
Still required an SB600 set on remote mode with a sto-fen diffuser fitted to light them, otherwise long shutter speeds are required.
I was surprised that there was no vignetting, but I suppose these are just a very poor man's extension tube, so vignetting shouldn't happen at all.
The camera reads f/0 when you run it without a lens!
I'm really keen to re-visit the grooves on the record one, it was a nightmare to light it correctly, so this one didn't come out at all as I hoped. I think a 100% crop could look mad...
Edited by _dobbo_ on Thursday 23 November 20:19
Gassing Station | Photography & Video | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff



Nice one. 