Armourfend - Pros & Cons
Armourfend - Pros & Cons
Author
Discussion

pbsaxman

Original Poster:

977 posts

254 months

Monday 16th October 2006
quotequote all
The obvious con is the line across the bonnet and the pro, presumably, less stone chips. Do I get it or not??

Discuss

Ta, Peter

obes

3,298 posts

273 months

Monday 16th October 2006
quotequote all
About the same price as a respray.......

AMG Merc

11,955 posts

282 months

Monday 16th October 2006
quotequote all
I wouldn't bother - 'Law of Sod' says the biggest stone will miss the film all together or if it hits will go right through! Selective resprays will cost you less in the end, IMHO.

EpsomJames

790 posts

275 months

Monday 16th October 2006
quotequote all
I had armourfend on my last car, a Lotus Elise (again fibreglass). To be honest, unless you can armourfend the entire front all the way up to the windscreen it's not worth it. You just end up getting stonechips on the parts that are not covered, and then it's costly to remove, respray and re-armourfend.

Just put the money aside for a respray at a later date.

alex_123_fra

355 posts

265 months

Monday 16th October 2006
quotequote all
Mine had armourfend when I bought it. It has protected the front clam very well. After the line where it stops at the bottom of the front clam, there were quite a few small chips. Instead of a complete respray, all I had to get done was the very small area below the armourfend line. Much cheaper and looks good. When I have it taken off eventually, the theory is that the paintwork below should be as it was when new.

Edited by alex_123_fra on Monday 16th October 20:41

pbsaxman

Original Poster:

977 posts

254 months

Tuesday 17th October 2006
quotequote all
Thanks guys. One pro and three cons seems to suggest I don't bother.
I must admit I do hate the line it leaves across the middle of the front clam but I also hate a pockmarked view of stonechips as well. How often do those of you without have to get the front clam resprayed to hide the unsightly chips and how much does that cost?

Have to see how much it costs to fit and more importantly how much of an added delay it puts on me getting the car

Peter

AMG Merc

11,955 posts

282 months

Tuesday 17th October 2006
quotequote all
pbsaxman said:
How often do those of you without have to get the front clam resprayed to hide the unsightly chips and how much does that cost?
Peter


Actually not a simple answer as some paint jobs came out of SA very thin/watery meaning they were more prone to chipping than others so it depends on the individual car. Mine seems very solid, after 12,000 miles with many high-speed (but within the law!) roadruns and a few track days nothing excessive just a nasty stone-chip above where the Armorfend line WOULD have been if I';d have had it fitted!

chillidog

1,021 posts

264 months

Tuesday 17th October 2006
quotequote all
Peter, if you hate stone chips then get something to protect the rear wheel arches - I'm sure someone on here will remind us of price and availability. This area gets the biggest hammering - see [pic]www.nobletv.co.uk/Pictures/Owner's%20Albums/Chillidog/slides/PICT0097.JPG[/pic] .. note the white area!

If you want to see what the 3M Smartguard stuff looks on the front it's in some of the pictures here: www.nobletv.co.uk/Pictures/Owner's%20Albums/Chillidog/index.html and after a lot of trackdays and a foray into a gravel trap the front end still looks pretty good.
--
Richard

pbsaxman

Original Poster:

977 posts

254 months

Tuesday 17th October 2006
quotequote all
chillidog said:
Peter, if you hate stone chips then get something to protect the rear wheel arches - I'm sure someone on here will remind us of price and availability. This area gets the biggest hammering - see [pic]www.nobletv.co.uk/Pictures/Owner's%20Albums/Chillidog/slides/PICT0097.JPG[/pic] .. note the white area!

If you want to see what the 3M Smartguard stuff looks on the front it's in some of the pictures here: www.nobletv.co.uk/Pictures/Owner's%20Albums/Chillidog/index.html and after a lot of trackdays and a foray into a gravel trap the front end still looks pretty good.
--
Richard


Richard, for some reason the link comes up site not found???
Decisions, decisions. I'm supposed to be retired and not doing decision making any more jester
If these pics do arrive I'll have a good look and see what I think.

Cheers guys

Peter

worty

2,202 posts

254 months

Tuesday 17th October 2006
quotequote all
Peter
The link doesn't work properly because its not picking up the whole of the address. Just copy the who of the address ( including those bits not coloured blue)into the address bar of explorer and you'll see the pics
HTH
worty

chillidog

1,021 posts

264 months

Tuesday 17th October 2006
quotequote all
pbsaxman said:
Richard, for some reason the link comes up site not found???


Just select the whole of the URL (not just the underlined bit) and copy and paste into your browser window.

Ah ... worty beat me to it.
--
Richard

Edited by chillidog on Tuesday 17th October 12:55

pbsaxman

Original Poster:

977 posts

254 months

Tuesday 17th October 2006
quotequote all
Cheers guys will give that a try. Old git me, not so very computer literate!!