Bilstein PSS9 or Manthey KW Suspension
Bilstein PSS9 or Manthey KW Suspension
Author
Discussion

jon luik

Original Poster:

79 posts

258 months

Tuesday 22nd August 2006
quotequote all
Hi Guys

I'm looking at changing my suspension, the Bilstein PSS9 or Manthey KW seem to be the choice.

Looking for road and track use.

Any suggestions ?

996tt_stevo

4,078 posts

258 months

Tuesday 22nd August 2006
quotequote all
KW all the way, don't get me wrong the Bilstein is good but the KW is another level, I have just been looking into this recently!

steve rance

5,453 posts

261 months

Tuesday 22nd August 2006
quotequote all
jon luik said:
Hi Guys

I'm looking at changing my suspension, the Bilstein PSS9 or Manthey KW seem to be the choice.

Looking for road and track use.

Any suggestions ?


Also look at JRZ. It's a very good product

granville

18,764 posts

291 months

Tuesday 22nd August 2006
quotequote all
I think I've got this KW stuff recently fitted and it seems to make precisely no difference to the outgoing PSS9 setup.

However, I'm reliably informed it's cunning stuff but I doubt very much it will diminish in any way whatsoever, the likelihood of me pirouetting orf in time honoured fashion at Silverstone this Thursday.


Schnell, schnell!

Rolter Whirl (das Nord635schleife.) rotate

anonymous-user

84 months

Tuesday 22nd August 2006
quotequote all
derestrictor said:
Silverstone this Thursday.

Schnell, schnell!




bounce

jon luik

Original Poster:

79 posts

258 months

Tuesday 22nd August 2006
quotequote all
derestrictor said:
I think I've got this KW stuff recently fitted and it seems to make precisely no difference to the outgoing PSS9 setup.




Can I ask why you decided to replace the PSS9 set up with Manthey KW ?

Also where is the best place to get it fitted in the SE ?

Cheers

gt3rs

402 posts

268 months

Tuesday 22nd August 2006
quotequote all
JZ Machtec 01923269788 ask for Steve

granville

18,764 posts

291 months

Tuesday 22nd August 2006
quotequote all
John,

A well known GT2 hoonist (993 elitist) uses it and according to our mutual fettlman, is worth a punt: not as pricey as Eibach but no worse than PSS9s and a change is as good as a rest and all that so why not?

Frank Bucholz (above, sometime bass player with German heavy rock pioneers 'Das Scorpions' during their 'Virgin Killer' tour of 1977, now serial corporate raider, junk bond addict and all round playboy) can probably shed immensely more light than I.

I just get in, plant my foot and trust to luck.

Btw, I've heard a vicious rumour that are the badgers no more about the hedgerows of Copse?

993rsr

3,673 posts

279 months

Wednesday 13th September 2006
quotequote all
Jon

Got the KW suspension on my 993GT2 and it's superb. Had a few teathing problems with fitment but after this it's been great. Looks very well made and has transformed the GT2.

BTW if your Dad's name is Ted your ears must be burning!

John

imom

262 posts

276 months

Wednesday 13th September 2006
quotequote all
Hey JC HOW,S THAT GINGER (KETTLE) OH SORRY 996 GT3, STILL CAN'T BE BELIEVE YOU'VE JUMPED SHIP STILL MATCHES WHATS LEFT OF YOUR HAIR.

993rsr

3,673 posts

279 months

Wednesday 13th September 2006
quotequote all
Now come on Gentley, for someone who's barnet exudes a somewhat copper hue that's a bit of the pot calling the kettle black - or should that be ginger?

imom

262 posts

276 months

Wednesday 13th September 2006
quotequote all
COM ON CAPT'N GINGER I AM WAITING YOUR REPLY

993rsr

3,673 posts

279 months

Wednesday 13th September 2006
quotequote all
Look above SHOUTING BOY

aasc

358 posts

263 months

Wednesday 13th September 2006
quotequote all
Is the Manthey KW setup specifically road/Nurburgring focussed in that it's fit & forget & your car would monster the NS if you have the ability. Compared to PSS9's which have adjustability but no specific "named tuner" setting.

The KW's should still be adjustable - in a similar fashion to PSS9's - KW's also have s/steel which means (allegedly) less grief when re-adjusting ride heights etc.

Raven Flyer

1,645 posts

254 months

Wednesday 13th September 2006
quotequote all
I suspect that both are a bit more track orientated than the OE stuff and by far the biggest improvement will come from the geometry dialed into the installation.

At the end of the day, race cars use suspension that would make a road car totally unusable on the road (had one of them), so what's good for the track is useless for the road.

All suspension will have a compromise somewhere, you just have to decide (or hope) that an aftermarket suspension kit has its compromise somewhere you are happy for it to be.

If a good compromise is installed badly, it will be substantially worse than road or race suspension, in all conditions. Research the bump and rebound rates, the spring rates and the amount of travel available. Ask for graphs of the dyno runs and compare these with the other options. Look for smooth ovals and look for un-fading consistency. Heavy springs will put a huge load on the dampers and may have them fading badly after 20 minutes. Fine for a race where the track is flat and smooth, disastrous for a typical UK A/B road. How do the spring rates compare? Are they in pro-rata to the original rates? If not, how will the different rates change the car's balance? Will they lead to snap oversteer? Terminal understeer unless always trail braking? How will the car handle in the wet?

My big observation is that most people who have taken the plunge will tell everyone how much better it is. Few will actually say that they wish they had left it alone, or will say they have wasted their money. People are like this as they do not wish to be seen as a fool who was parted with his money. There is a notable exception, above.

Decide at which point across the scale you want your suspension to be optimal and then find a manufacturer and installer that can supply what you want. But look at the specs and the rates to see if the salesman is telling the truth.

I have a bit of 'previous' in suspension design.