Chimaera or Griffith? Advice needed!
Chimaera or Griffith? Advice needed!
Author
Discussion

Ollyd

Original Poster:

1,872 posts

248 months

Monday 23rd January 2006
quotequote all
I have finally decided to take the plunge and buy myself a TVR. Having looked at this discussion board for a while I reckon this might be the place to get the advice I need.

I had made my mind up to go for a lowish mileage, 1999 or later Chimaera 450 or 500 BUT a few folks have said that the Griffith is also worth a look. I like the look of both but to be honest I am not that familiar with the differences between the two. I plan to use the car a fair bit so am looking for some degree of practicality and comfort (which I hope both can provide) and I also really want something that handles well - is there a major difference between the two in this respect? Reliability is also important as I don't live close to a TVR garage. Any thoughts or advice out there? Thanks in advance.

2 sMoKiN bArReLs

32,007 posts

264 months

Monday 23rd January 2006
quotequote all
1) A lot more Chimaeras than Griffs about
2) I found the Griff far more twitchy & unforgiving of uneven surfaces
3) Roof off operation more of a fandango in Griff, but I'm sure there's a knack
4) Buy price/resale higher in a Griff

2 sMoKiN bArReLs

32,007 posts

264 months

Monday 23rd January 2006
quotequote all
Reliability: get it checked, but you pays yer money & you takes yer chance! They are different to the mainstream, but basically sound. You will get weirdness, and your love for your car needs to be significant! (But that's not usually a problem)

Trellis

590 posts

268 months

Monday 23rd January 2006
quotequote all
No inherent difference in reliability.

No difference in handling IMO (tho some may differ!)

The real difference (aside from the obvious) is practicality - I found the Griff much harder to live with if you want to take weekends away or go on camping/touring trips. The boot is bigger on the Chim - which also makes stowing the roof panel easier - and the interior has a bit more space too.

Having owned 400 and 450 Chims and a 500HC Griff - I have to say I find the 450 the best to drive - it can keep up with a 5 litre but I find it less 'full on' when I just want to take it easy.

Ultimately its horses for courses and you'll only know once you've tested a few. All these cars are quick enough to be great fun!! (and/or dangerous in the wrong hands!)

hope this helps.

Trellis

590 posts

268 months

Monday 23rd January 2006
quotequote all
No inherent difference in reliability.

No difference in handling IMO (tho some may differ!)

The real difference (aside from the obvious) is practicality - I found the Griff much harder to live with if you want to take weekends away or go on camping/touring trips. The boot is bigger on the Chim - which also makes stowing the roof panel easier - and the interior has a bit more space too.

Having owned 400 and 450 Chims and a 500HC Griff - I have to say I find the 450 the best to drive - it can keep up with a 5 litre but I find it less 'full on' when I just want to take it easy.

Ultimately its horses for courses and you'll only know once you've tested a few. All these cars are quick enough to be great fun!! (and/or dangerous in the wrong hands!)

hope this helps.

bjwoods

5,018 posts

313 months

Monday 23rd January 2006
quotequote all
boot space is of course relative,

as in a griff, you have approximately TWO - THREE time the space as an MX5, roof up... the only issue is the roof is a bit of a kanck to get in the boot, BUT if, as most people do, leave the space safer at home (NOT even supplied with later griffs?) it still leaves a lot of space...

Ie BOTH griff and CHIM CAN get 2 full sets of golf clubs bags in, butthe griff will only take one lightweight troilley, to the chims 2 lightweight trolleys. AS an understandable comparison...

Take a look, A well sorted griff 500, comapred to a well sorted chim 500, should all intents and purposes, handle/drive thesame, have the same performance, and have the same running costs.

So just choose the sahpe you prefer.. As far as i'm aware, these running costs would be no different, if you had a 4.5 chim of a similar vintage.

B

deeen

6,403 posts

274 months

Monday 23rd January 2006
quotequote all
They're the same, under the skin - you could lift the fibreglass off a Griffith and bolt it straight on to a Chimaera rolling spaceframe chassis, and vice-versa.

So, which do you like the look of?

srebbe64

13,021 posts

266 months

Monday 23rd January 2006
quotequote all
As above they're both pretty similar. The only reason I chose a Griff was because I preferred the shape and I found a really low mileage car in imaculate condition.

cdt

537 posts

311 months

Monday 23rd January 2006
quotequote all
Two side by side if it helps, new and old:



You could buy a wedge instead ...

>> Edited by cdt on Monday 23 January 23:56

Ollyd

Original Poster:

1,872 posts

248 months

Monday 23rd January 2006
quotequote all
Thanks everyone,

Sounds like the Chim 450 is going to be the one for me. Now all I have to do is pick a good'un!

If I want someting really tidy, for say £17K, what sort of year / mileage should I be looking for?

barreti

6,689 posts

266 months

Tuesday 24th January 2006
quotequote all
Ollyd said:
Thanks everyone,

Sounds like the Chim 450 is going to be the one for me. Now all I have to do is pick a good'un!

If I want someting really tidy, for say £17K, what sort of year / mileage should I be looking for?

Bah humbug ...

vixpy1

42,699 posts

293 months

Tuesday 24th January 2006
quotequote all
Do you play golf(Chim) or wear a chestwig(Griff)

JonRB

80,038 posts

301 months

Tuesday 24th January 2006
quotequote all
vixpy1 said:
Do you play golf (Chim) or wear a chestwig (Griff)
Yes, there is a running gag on PistonHeads about those two stereotypes, but as others have already pointed out they are exactly the same car underneath (although if you go back enough they were different - I forget at what point the cars became the same underneath). So, given that, pick the car that you prefer the look of.

>> Edited by JonRB on Tuesday 24th January 08:58

cu57ard

60 posts

257 months

Tuesday 24th January 2006
quotequote all
I'm not liked much on here at the moment but i spent a good 6 months searching for the right one, if you want a reliable motor get one that is as new as possible, there are a lot of older cars with low milage that hardly ever get serviced. after looking at alot of 98 models (the biggest production year) and none of them really doing it for me, griffs or chims.. i found a 2000 model it had a few more miles but being younger had a better interior, body, chassis and had been serviced often.. grifs do hold there value better but i decided i wanted a car to drive and live with not an investment.. and the boot on a chim is huge, it'll take 70 kg and easily fit a lap dancer or two! my 450 averaging 19mpg and it only takes optimax(98 ocatne) i tried some lesser 97 octane fuel think it was bp ultimate and she wouldn't start... just some things to think about. better than a boxster regardless of what topgear say check ther group test.. i drive mine every day no hicups and i get very angry when corsa owners preach about reliability and build quality , vauxhall honestly!

Tripps

5,814 posts

301 months

Tuesday 24th January 2006
quotequote all
Go with your heart and pick the one that does it for you.

Then find a local dealer or indy and do back to back test drive of the various engines, depending on your past exerience you may be more than happy with a 4.0L - failing that go to a local meet and people will be glad do give you some demo drives.

Once you done that, look at as many cars as you can decide upon your preferred interior and exterior colours, preference for leather, shiny bits etc. and start looking at PH, TVRCC, AutoTrader for what you want, or call one of the various brokers who will look on your behalf.

Condition is everything on these, you'll find some 80k mile example that look stunning, have everything replaced or polished and a fantastic history - on the flip side you have newer cars with full TVR dealer history that aren't always that good, everyone is different with these cars, you just need to find one thats been loved.

Don't let the smaller boot "issue" on the Griff sway you too much BTW, it still big enough for trips away (some have been for weeks, not just weekends) or camping at Le Mans etc.

cu57ard

60 posts

257 months

Tuesday 24th January 2006
quotequote all
i hear what you saying tripps and i agree its gotta be loved... when icalled the chap about mine he was still cleaning it.. nice touch that... did test drive some shitters though

cu57ard

60 posts

257 months

Tuesday 24th January 2006
quotequote all
gotta agree with that

TeGriffic

1,598 posts

280 months

Tuesday 24th January 2006
quotequote all
JonRB said:
vixpy1 said:
Do you play golf (Chim) or wear a chestwig (Griff)
Yes, there is a running gag on PistonHeads about those two stereotypes

www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?t=237744&f=8&h=0

jellison

12,803 posts

306 months

Wednesday 25th January 2006
quotequote all
Get a 500 - you will want one after a while - easier to hot up if the bug really gets to you.

Chim / Griff - exacly the same underneath - chim a bit longer rea overhanger hence brilliant boot - a use it to the full - could not live with the small Griff one and the "getting the hood intosucha small space issue". But like the look of both - both have great visuals some bits better on each - you take you pic.

Do it. Drive it regularly and it will be reliable - well "ish".

rev-erend

21,619 posts

313 months

Wednesday 25th January 2006
quotequote all
Some of the comments about same underneath are not strictly true.

They had different chassis / suspension set's up's prior
on 1997.

1997 on - chassis the same !

The suspension was softer and more forgiving on the Chim - all years but could be specified with the harder 'Griff' setup.

Totally agree with Jellison - go for the 500 as it has power to spare and will save you wanting to upgrade later.