George Galloway BB petition!
George Galloway BB petition!
Author
Discussion

Bomber Denton

Original Poster:

8,762 posts

298 months

Tyre Smoke

23,018 posts

291 months

Tuesday 10th January 2006
quotequote all
Oi Denton!

Shouldn't you Grauniad readers be getting all excited about voting for your new leader now that Chapagne Charlie is sitting in the bogs with a vomit speckled shirt asking everyone if they've got a fag they can spare?


You're not seriously watching that crap are you?

Yugguy

10,728 posts

265 months

Tuesday 10th January 2006
quotequote all
MPs get 61k???

Jesus H Christ.

That is just WRONG.

Bomber Denton

Original Poster:

8,762 posts

298 months

Tuesday 10th January 2006
quotequote all
No mate - not at all

anonymous-user

84 months

Tuesday 10th January 2006
quotequote all
Yugguy said:
MPs get 61k???

Jesus H Christ.

That is just WRONG.


I agree. It's far too little. Thats why we get such poor quality MP's.

Plotloss

67,280 posts

300 months

Tuesday 10th January 2006
quotequote all
Bearing in mind it was 36K when the marxists got in...

Raffles

1,931 posts

260 months

Tuesday 10th January 2006
quotequote all
unrepentant said:
Yugguy said:
MPs get 61k???

Jesus H Christ.

That is just WRONG.


I agree. It's far too little. Thats why we get such poor quality MP's.



If it was more, the guys who can run a successful company would aspire to be MPs. As it stands, if you have a talent, you can use it in industry to make a huge amount of money.

MPs should be paid more.

ETA: Imagine Dr Peiche (VW guy) running a government!!

>> Edited by Raffles on Tuesday 10th January 11:38

alfaman

6,416 posts

264 months

Tuesday 10th January 2006
quotequote all
Yugguy said:
MPs get 61k???

Jesus H Christ.

That is just WRONG.


indeed its wrong ...... its £61k plus several chunks of £500k in non-exec fees and share options ( that don't get disclosed ) , plus a few £ million in after dinner speech fees and/or memoire royalties ....... none of which they would have earned if they weren't MP's or ministers.

It must be tough surviving on such a meagre salary.

edit : a pre-requisite for being an MP should be some experience working in "real world" businesses or industry (rather than academia , local govt. and politics )

...... that may prevent many of the highly educated but totally inexperienced academic-theorising-diatribing-head-up-their-own-arse but ultimately useless c^nts from running the country.

>> Edited by alfaman on Tuesday 10th January 11:47

Tyre Smoke

23,018 posts

291 months

Tuesday 10th January 2006
quotequote all
Raffles said:
unrepentant said:
Yugguy said:
MPs get 61k???

Jesus H Christ.

That is just WRONG.


I agree. It's far too little. Thats why we get such poor quality MP's.



If it was more, the guys who can run a successful company would aspire to be MPs. As it stands, if you have a talent, you can use it in industry to make a huge amount of money.

MPs should be paid more.

ETA: Imagine Dr Peiche (VW guy) running a government!!

>> Edited by Raffles on Tuesday 10th January 11:38


You are joking, right?

They are all a bunch of prevaricating cnuts who are totally incapable of answering a question with a straight answer, and cannot make a decision without guidance.

They should be paid absolutely nothing. That way you get people who genuinely want to make a difference rather than bloody economics graduates who can't get a job anywhere else.

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

285 months

Tuesday 10th January 2006
quotequote all
Raffles said:


MPs should be paid more.

ETA: Imagine Dr Peiche (VW guy) running a government!!



I think you mean Ministers....

The office of MP includes such useless gobshites as the aforementioned Scottish gentleprat....

zoom_jones

858 posts

289 months

Tuesday 10th January 2006
quotequote all
At least his constituents can watch him sitting on his arse doing nothing instead of just suspecting he does.

MP Watch, webcams in all the MP offices to see how hard they're working. I can see it now...

off_again

13,917 posts

264 months

Tuesday 10th January 2006
quotequote all
alfaman said:
Yugguy said:
MPs get 61k???

Jesus H Christ.

That is just WRONG.


indeed its wrong ...... its £61k plus several chunks of £500k in non-exec fees and share options ( that don't get disclosed ) , plus a few £ million in after dinner speech fees and/or memoire royalties ....... none of which they would have earned if they weren't MP's or ministers.

It must be tough surviving on such a meagre salary.


Yes, thats why they can afford £1m central london homes, 3 holidays a year and just about every other luxury they want. And they say that its all done with fairness and without any conflicts of interest.... which of course is complete bollox as they are all interested in lining their own pockets and creating a pension fund that even the Duke of Westminster would be proud of....

Scumbags the lot of 'em.

anonymous-user

84 months

Tuesday 10th January 2006
quotequote all
alfaman said:
Yugguy said:
MPs get 61k???

Jesus H Christ.

That is just WRONG.


indeed its wrong ...... its £61k plus several chunks of £500k in non-exec fees and share options ( that don't get disclosed ) , plus a few £ million in after dinner speech fees and/or memoire royalties ....... none of which they would have earned if they weren't MP's or ministers.

It must be tough surviving on such a meagre salary.


Nothing like that. Hague was the only one who came close last year, earned about £1 million all up.

Your average MP would struggle to get any non exec directorships and anything more than modest fees for speaking.

I was on the board of a plc. We had an ex tory minister (rather a well known one) who was still an MP on as a non exec. Paid him less than 20k and when he published his autobiog it was a vanity publishing job.

The only ones who can command really big fees and sell books are the heavy hitters like Hague or the awkward squad like the late Tony Banks.

>> Edited by anonymous-user on Tuesday 10th January 11:51

alfaman

6,416 posts

264 months

Tuesday 10th January 2006
quotequote all
off_again said:
alfaman said:
Yugguy said:
MPs get 61k???

Jesus H Christ.

That is just WRONG.


indeed its wrong ...... its £61k plus several chunks of £500k in non-exec fees and share options ( that don't get disclosed ) , plus a few £ million in after dinner speech fees and/or memoire royalties ....... none of which they would have earned if they weren't MP's or ministers.

It must be tough surviving on such a meagre salary.


Yes, thats why they can afford £1m central london homes, 3 holidays a year and just about every other luxury they want. And they say that its all done with fairness and without any conflicts of interest.... which of course is complete bollox as they are all interested in lining their own pockets and creating a pension fund that even the Duke of Westminster would be proud of....

Scumbags the lot of 'em.


and I almost forgot to mention the free London palace or 2 ( ermmm "flat" ) that some of them are provided with , council tax exemption (e.g : Blunkett) , while letting out their other properties .

mybrainhurts

90,809 posts

285 months

Tuesday 10th January 2006
quotequote all
Meanwhile, back at the petition.....

Tell George what you think....

Was going to do that, but it's limited to 500 characters.....bugger

xm5er

5,094 posts

278 months

Tuesday 10th January 2006
quotequote all
Raffles said:

ETA: Imagine Dr Peiche (VW guy) running a government!!



Indeed, imagine the health service, you could give it about 8 different brand names from an excitingly latino brand for young thrusting types to a reliable, if a little staid, eastern european brand for working class family men, all underpinned by exactly the same hospitals, doctors and nurses.

billb

3,198 posts

295 months

Tuesday 10th January 2006
quotequote all
yes lets pay them nothing then they'll have to be as corrupt as the american ones to earn their cash that'll help..

anonymous-user

84 months

Tuesday 10th January 2006
quotequote all
The old system was better. A chap entered the house out of a sense of duty, not for what he could get out of it. A chap had made his money, now it was his turn to put something back, by serving his country.

The these fkin socialists came along and everything changed.

dj111s

30,324 posts

257 months

Tuesday 10th January 2006
quotequote all
mybrainhurts said:
Meanwhile, back at the petition.....

Tell George what you think....

Was going to do that, but it's limited to 500 characters.....bugger


Not all bad. You can get the word in 100 times.

chris watton

22,547 posts

290 months

Tuesday 10th January 2006
quotequote all
unrepentant said:
The old system was better. A chap entered the house out of a sense of duty, not for what he could get out of it. A chap had made his money, now it was his turn to put something back, by serving his country.

The these fkin socialists came along and everything changed.


, and further down the line on the gravy train, we have our Euro MPs, who 'seem' to be accountable to no-one!