hdtv again
Author
Discussion

baskey

Original Poster:

14,291 posts

256 months

Tuesday 8th November 2005
quotequote all
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainm

so if the bbc are considering broadcasting the world cup finals in hdtv on digital does that mean that freeview adapters can receive the signal etc etc..? or that hdtv digital tv's could receive an hdtv digital freeview signal..? confused.com..

dieseljohn

2,114 posts

286 months

Tuesday 8th November 2005
quotequote all
Good question, I have an HDTV with a built in free-view decoder (which I don't use) so I presume it would accept HDTV signals?

blindswelledrat

25,257 posts

262 months

Tuesday 8th November 2005
quotequote all
Just to semi-hijack this does anyone know how I can find out whether my tv is HD ready?

baskey

Original Poster:

14,291 posts

256 months

Tuesday 8th November 2005
quotequote all
blindswelledrat said:
Just to semi-hijack this does anyone know how I can find out whether my tv is HD ready?


google the model number..? not taking the micky but loads of people try and say the panasonic thblahblah50s are hdtv but panasonics site says it's the thblahblah500

allnighter

6,663 posts

252 months

Tuesday 8th November 2005
quotequote all
In order to receive HDTV signal you need to have an HDTV decoder, without it you get zilch.
The fact that your plasma is HDTV ready does not mean you receive the signal automatically.What it means is , the plasma is "connectable" to an HDTV decoder, and capable of dispalying a High Definition picture far superior to that of freeview or DVD .As it stands the PAL system we use is displayed at 625 lines.HDTV will dense up the display to around 1080 lines which will enable you to see the tiniest detail in any displayed film .
Sky is going ahead with HDTV next year which means it would have to supply new decoders to any takers.Those who don't have HDTV ready displays can watch HDTV on a "scaled down" basis from the HDTV decoder output ie : normal scart connection, and in order to watch pure HDTV picture on your plasma you would need a "digital" cable too.

As far as DVD standard for HDTV , nothing has been decided yet on which standard they are going to agree on.
It is a stand off between BLU-RAY (sony) or HD-DVD (Toshiba) which reminds me of VHS v BETAMAX.
Again it would mean new dvd machines , new higher quality BLU-RAY (or) HD-DVD dvds(movies) in order to take advantage of the quality.Whether they will be backward compatible with "standard" dvds god knows!

Technology for you hey!

>> Edited by allnighter on Tuesday 8th November 14:49

mcflurry

9,190 posts

283 months

Tuesday 8th November 2005
quotequote all
Having seen a complete HDTV system in action in Canada, it is awesome

randlemarcus

13,646 posts

261 months

Tuesday 8th November 2005
quotequote all
Not forgetting the cables...

After PC World et al seem to be becoming slightly less ravenously piratical about gouging the uninformed, and we could all start to relax a little, along comes HDTV, and pure digital interfaces. And cables:
www.comet.co.uk/comet/html/cache/391_261246.html

neil.b

6,546 posts

277 months

Tuesday 8th November 2005
quotequote all
I don't know for sure, but I think there's no way on earth that they'd broadcast the football on HD only if there's no going to be some kind of adapters or something. If you look at the US situation, the US government has actually set aside billions of dollars to smooth over the transition, including the purchase of adapters for non-HD TVs (can't remember where I read that). I also read some market predictions before I bought my non-HD plasma; its estimated that HD TVs will achieve the same level of market penetration of ordinary plasmas by 2010. They just would not cut off a massive advertising audience until then.

IMHO, of course.

Mr E

23,079 posts

289 months

Tuesday 8th November 2005
quotequote all
allnighter said:

Again it would mean new dvd machines , new higher quality BLU-RAY (or) HD-DVD dvds(movies) in order to take advantage of the quality.Whether they will be backward compatible with "standard" dvds god knows!


Blu-Ray is tecnically superior. HD-DVD is probably cheaper.

Both should be backward compatable.

allnighter

6,663 posts

252 months

Wednesday 9th November 2005
quotequote all
Mr E said:


Blu-Ray is tecnically superior.

yeah I know , so was Betamax , and look who prevailed! LOL

dilbert

7,741 posts

261 months

Wednesday 9th November 2005
quotequote all
allnighter said:
Mr E said:


Blu-Ray is tecnically superior.

yeah I know , so was Betamax , and look who prevailed! LOL


So was video disk, and look where we are now!

baskey

Original Poster:

14,291 posts

256 months

Wednesday 9th November 2005
quotequote all
i thought about this last night - i reckon they may just be broadcasting hdtv football - via sky's sustem to viewers with the newfangled skybox. perhaps.

randlemarcus

13,646 posts

261 months

Wednesday 9th November 2005
quotequote all
If I read the technical reports correctly, the BBC will be broadcasting a chunk of programming in HDTV, but due to multiplex bandwidth issues on the Digital Terrestrial Freeview stuff, they will be renting space on the Sky satellite to broadcast to anyone with a Sky HD box.
Freeview will not really have enough bandwidth to broadcast HDTV till the analogue switch off in 2012.

The other option of course, is the IPTV option, of TV to a device over broadband ethernet...

baskey

Original Poster:

14,291 posts

256 months

Wednesday 9th November 2005
quotequote all
randlemarcus said:
If I read the technical reports correctly, the BBC will be broadcasting a chunk of programming in HDTV, but due to multiplex bandwidth issues on the Digital Terrestrial Freeview stuff, they will be renting space on the Sky satellite to broadcast to anyone with a Sky HD box.
Freeview will not really have enough bandwidth to broadcast HDTV till the analogue switch off in 2012.

The other option of course, is the IPTV option, of TV to a device over broadband ethernet...



like Homechoice..?
i think that kind of system is the way forward personally (not knowing the technicalities involved) it's a shame they don't serve tht much of the country.